Generalizations from an interpretive study: the case of a South African community-based health information system

This paper explores the making of generalizations from interpretive research by examining the process of developing a community-based information system (IS) in a rural area in South Africa. Lee and Baskerville’s [1] framework of four categories, and Walsham’s four types, of generalizations form a framework that is used in this case study. Using the concept of the Ideal Speech Situation two empirical to theoretical generalizations are made: the reconceptualization of participation and the need to generate common ground in which free and open dialogue between those who use, and those who are affected by the IS, is made possible. The main argument of this paper, using the generalizations made from this single case study, is that generalizations from interpretive research can be made and that much valuable contribution in the IS field is lost because IS researchers fail to make these generalizations.

[1]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[2]  Shivraj Kanungo,et al.  On the emancipatory role of rural information systems , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[3]  M. Turshen Development as Freedom , 2001 .

[4]  Tamar Frankel [The theory and the practice...]. , 2001, Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde.

[5]  M. D. Myers,et al.  A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project , 1994 .

[6]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  Stacey Cone Endless Propaganda: The Advertising of Public Goods , 2002 .

[8]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[9]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[10]  Jørn Braa,et al.  Networks of Action: Sustainable Health Information Systems Across Developing Countries , 2004, MIS Q..

[11]  Max Elden,et al.  Cogenerative Learning: Bringing Participation into Action Research , 1991 .

[12]  R. Dusewicz,et al.  Final Evaluation Report , 1992 .

[13]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[14]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Distinctions Among Different Types of Generalizing in Information Systems Research , 1999, New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes.

[15]  Elaine Byrne,et al.  Contextuality of participation in IS design: a developing country perspective , 2004, PDC 04.

[16]  Marc Berg,et al.  The contextual nature of medical information , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[19]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Habermas and the Public Sphere. , 1993 .

[20]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Information Systems Development as an Activity , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Nicholas Garnham,et al.  Habermas and the public sphere , 2007 .

[22]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[23]  Richard Baskerville Deferring Generalizability: Four Classes of Generalization in Social Enquir , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  A. L. Thornton Does the internet create democracy? , 2001 .

[25]  Allen S. Lee Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[26]  P. Pettit The Possibility of Naturalism. , 1981 .

[27]  N. wenyama,et al.  WHAT DOES COMPUTER SUPPORT FOR COOPERATIVE WORK MEAN ? A STRUCTURATIONAL ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK , 2001 .

[28]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..