A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts.

Cell mechanical functions such as locomotion, contraction, and division are controlled by the cytoskeleton, a dynamic biopolymer network whose mechanical properties remain poorly understood. We perform single-cell uniaxial stretching experiments on 3T3 fibroblasts. By superimposing small amplitude oscillations on a mechanically prestressed cell, we find a transition from linear viscoelastic behavior to power law stress stiffening. Data from different cells over several stress decades can be uniquely scaled to obtain a master relation between the viscoelastic moduli and the average force. Remarkably, this relation holds independently of deformation history, adhesion biochemistry, and intensity of active contraction. In particular, it is irrelevant whether force is actively generated by the cell or externally imposed by stretching. We propose that the master relation reflects the mechanical behavior of the force-bearing actin cytoskeleton, in agreement with stress stiffening known from semiflexible filament networks.

[1]  D. Smith,et al.  Active fluidization of polymer networks through molecular motors , 2002, Nature.

[2]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Integrins in Mechanotransduction* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Marie-France Carlier,et al.  Forces generated during actin-based propulsion: a direct measurement by micromanipulation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C F Dewey,et al.  Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[5]  J. Molloy,et al.  Contractility of single human dermal myofibroblasts and fibroblasts. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[6]  J. Howard,et al.  Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton , 2001 .

[7]  P. Janmey,et al.  Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[8]  D. Taylor,et al.  The role of solation-contraction coupling in regulating stress fiber dynamics in nonmuscle cells , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Macromolecular Architecture in Eukaryotic Cells Visualized by Cryoelectron Tomography , 2002, Science.

[10]  C. Verdier.  Review Article: Rheological Properties of Living Materials. From Cells to Tissues , 2003 .

[11]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[12]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Effect of 2,3-butanedione monoxime on myosin and myofibrillar ATPases. An example of an uncompetitive inhibitor. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[13]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[14]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[15]  D. Navajas,et al.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[16]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  The cytomechanics of axonal elongation and retraction , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  H. Green,et al.  Antigenic and cultural properties of cells doubly transformed by polyoma virus and SV40. , 1965, Virology.

[18]  H. Green,et al.  QUANTITATIVE STUDIES OF THE GROWTH OF MOUSE EMBRYO CELLS IN CULTURE AND THEIR DEVELOPMENT INTO ESTABLISHED LINES , 1963, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  J. Trempe.  Molecular biology of the cell, 3rd edition Bruce Alberts, Dennis Bray, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts and James D. Watson, Garland Publishing, 1994, 559.95 (xiii + 1294 pages), ISBN 0-815-31619-4 , 1995, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[20]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[21]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Slow filament dynamics and viscoelasticity in entangled and active actin networks , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[22]  F. Jülicher,et al.  On the ‘listeria’ propulsion mechanism , 1999 .

[23]  Y. Fung.  Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. , 1967, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[25]  I. Spector,et al.  Latrunculins: novel marine toxins that disrupt microfilament organization in cultured cells. , 1983, Science.

[26]  D. Bray,et al.  The actin content of fibroblasts. , 1975, The Biochemical journal.

[27]  H. Hidaka,et al.  Selective inhibition of catalytic activity of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  D. Navajas,et al.  Viscoelasticity of human alveolar epithelial cells subjected to stretch. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[29]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[30]  T van Dillen,et al.  Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[31]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Time scale and other invariants of integrative mechanical behavior in living cells. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[33]  G I Zahalak,et al.  Cell mechanics studied by a reconstituted model tissue. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[34]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Molecular theory of strain hardening of a polymer gel: Application to gelatin , 1996 .

[35]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Deformation of cross-linked semiflexible polymer networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[36]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Strain Hardening of Actin Filament Networks , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[38]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[39]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Resemblance of actin-binding protein/actin gels to covalently crosslinked networks , 1990, Nature.

[40]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  M. De Brabander,et al.  The effects of methyl (5-(2-thienylcarbonyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate, (R 17934; NSC 238159), a new synthetic antitumoral drug interfering with microtubules, on mammalian cells cultured in vitro. , 1976, Cancer research.

[42]  A. Huxley,et al.  The relation between stiffness and filament overlap in stimulated frog muscle fibres. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  G. M.,et al.  A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity , 1906, Nature.

[44]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Measurement of the persistence length of polymerized actin using fluorescence microscopy. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.