An Approximate Approach for Area Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract In Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), coverage is a critical issue that has a major bearing on the quality of sensing over the target region. In this paper, we study the coverage of a region P with a transparent boundary and transparent obstacles. A transparent obstacle is an area in which a sensor cannot be deployed but through which sensing signals can pass. For cost-effectiveness, our problem is to deploy the minimum number of sensors to cover P excluding the obstacles. This problem is challenging mainly due to the fact that the target region is continuous. A straight-forward idea is to sample a finite set of crucial coverage points in P, thus making the coverage space discrete. Most existing approaches, however, tend to either require too many sampled points, which leads to increased running time, or have an inferior coverage of the region. We propose a discretization approach which converts the area coverage problem into the problem of Minimum Geometric Disk Cover with Candidate Positions (MGDCCP) which is proved to be strongly NP-hard. We present a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) based on the shifting strategy for the MGDCCP problem. Specifically, our approach guarantees covering a (1−ɛ) fraction of the region with probability no less than (1−(ɛ/h)) using at most (1−(1/l)2)h sensors, where h is the theoretical minimal number of sensors needed to cover the region P, l is a positive integer parameter in the shifting strategy, and ɛ (0, 1) is the covering tolerance. Furthermore, we show that our proposed approach is output-sensitive with time complexity that is polynomial in the input size and the optimal solution size. Therefore, for any fixed parameter l and ɛ, the coverage accuracy, the running time, the approximation ratio and the success probability are all bounded.

[1]  Pankaj K. Agarwal,et al.  Efficient Sensor Placement for Surveillance Problems , 2009, DCOSS.

[2]  Yi Wang,et al.  Barrier coverage in camera sensor networks , 2011, MobiHoc '11.

[3]  Krishnendu Chakrabarty,et al.  Sensor deployment and target localization based on virtual forces , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[4]  R. Kershner The Number of Circles Covering a Set , 1939 .

[5]  David Haussler,et al.  Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension , 1989, JACM.

[6]  Wolfgang Maass,et al.  Approximation schemes for covering and packing problems in image processing and VLSI , 1985, JACM.

[7]  Francis C. M. Lau,et al.  Arbitrary Obstacles Constrained Full Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, WASA.

[8]  Jiming Chen,et al.  Cost-effective barrier coverage by mobile sensor networks , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[9]  Sampath Kannan,et al.  Sampling based sensor-network deployment , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[10]  Weijia Jia,et al.  Complete optimal deployment patterns for full-coverage and k-connectivity (k≤6) wireless sensor networks , 2008, MobiHoc '08.

[11]  Yang Liu,et al.  Minimum-energy connected coverage in wireless sensor networks with omni-directional and directional features , 2012, MobiHoc '12.

[12]  Jie Wu Handbook on Theoretical and Algorithmic Aspects of Sensor, Ad Hoc Wireless, and Peer-to-Peer Networks , 2005 .

[13]  Bang Wang,et al.  Coverage problems in sensor networks: A survey , 2011, CSUR.

[14]  David Haussler,et al.  Epsilon-nets and simplex range queries , 1986, SCG '86.

[15]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  Efficient Placement and Dispatch of Sensors in a Wireless Sensor Network , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[16]  Yeh-Ching Chung,et al.  A Delaunay Triangulation based method for wireless sensor network deployment , 2007, Comput. Commun..