Genetic Evaluation using Unsymmetric Single Step Genomic Methodology with Large Number of Genotypes

The single step genomic methodology provides a unified framework to integrate phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information in the prediction of breeding values. Minimal modifications of current softwares are necessary in order to incorporate extra relationship matrices, however computing such matrices has a cubic cost. Recently, a system of equations relaxing the computing cost of creating the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix was presented, which creates an unsymmetric system of equations. Bi Conjugate Gradient Stabilized solvers (BiCGSTAB) were proposed to solve unsymmetric system of equations and also can be used with iteration on data programs, resulting in a good choice for solving large-scale genetic evaluations. Here we describe the implementation of a large genetic evaluation using unsymmetric solvers within the iteration on data framework. Comparison with the regular single-step methodology is presented and the effects of different preconditioners and data structures on the convergence pattern were studied. A large scale genetic evaluation was feasible, however required more rounds to get convergence compared with the regular single-step. More sophisticated preconditioners are necessary to improve the convergence for solving unsymmetric single-step genomic evaluations.

[1]  Jean-Jacques Colleau,et al.  An indirect approach to the extensive calculation of relationship coefficients , 2002, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[2]  Ignacy Misztal,et al.  BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90) , 2002 .

[3]  M. Lund,et al.  Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  A Legarra,et al.  Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  I Misztal,et al.  Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  W. Muir,et al.  Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes. , 2012, Genetics research.

[8]  M. Lund,et al.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[9]  Michael Coffey,et al.  The use of GPUs in genomic data analysis , 2011 .

[10]  I Misztal,et al.  Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  Henk A. van der Vorst,et al.  Bi-CGSTAB: A Fast and Smoothly Converging Variant of Bi-CG for the Solution of Nonsymmetric Linear Systems , 1992, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  I Misztal,et al.  Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation. , 2011, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[13]  D. R. Fokkema,et al.  BICGSTAB( L ) FOR LINEAR EQUATIONS INVOLVING UNSYMMETRIC MATRICES WITH COMPLEX , 1993 .

[14]  I Misztal,et al.  Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. , 2011, Genetics research.

[15]  I. Misztal,et al.  Use of the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm as a generic solver for mixed-model equations in animal breeding applications. , 2001, Journal of animal science.