Under pressure: evolutionary engineering of yeast strains for improved performance in fuels and chemicals production.

Evolutionary engineering, which uses laboratory evolution to select for industrially relevant traits, is a popular strategy in the development of high-performing yeast strains for industrial production of fuels and chemicals. By integrating whole-genome sequencing, bioinformatics, classical genetics and genome-editing techniques, evolutionary engineering has also become a powerful approach for identification and reverse engineering of molecular mechanisms that underlie industrially relevant traits. New techniques enable acceleration of in vivo mutation rates, both across yeast genomes and at specific loci. Recent studies indicate that phenotypic trade-offs, which are often observed after evolution under constant conditions, can be mitigated by using dynamic cultivation regimes. Advances in research on synthetic regulatory circuits offer exciting possibilities to extend the applicability of evolutionary engineering to products of yeasts whose synthesis requires a net input of cellular energy.

[1]  Dai Lin,et al.  Antidiabetic Micro-/Nanoaggregates from Ge-Gen-Qin-Lian-Tang Decoction Increase Absorption of Baicalin and Cellular Antioxidant Activity In Vitro , 2017, BioMed research international.

[2]  Daniel J. Kvitek,et al.  PHENOTYPIC AND GENOTYPIC CONVERGENCES ARE INFLUENCED BY HISTORICAL CONTINGENCY AND ENVIRONMENT IN YEAST , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  Genetic Variation and the Fate of Beneficial Mutations in Asexual Populations , 2011, Genetics.

[4]  Jack T. Pronk,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation , 2017, FEMS yeast research.

[5]  Mette Kristensen,et al.  Functional mining of transporters using synthetic selections. , 2016, Nature chemical biology.

[6]  J. Thevelein,et al.  Rapid Evolution of Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Xylose Fermentation through Formation of Extra-chromosomal Circular DNA , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[7]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Industrial Systems Biology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Enables Novel Succinic Acid Cell Factory , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Fuzhong Zhang,et al.  Biosensors and their applications in microbial metabolic engineering. , 2011, Trends in microbiology.

[9]  Jianhui Gong,et al.  SCRaMbLE generates designed combinatorial stochastic diversity in synthetic chromosomes , 2016, Genome research.

[10]  Vratislav Stovicek,et al.  CRISPR/Cas system for yeast genome engineering: advances and applications , 2017, FEMS yeast research.

[11]  Jack T Pronk,et al.  Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. , 2005, FEMS yeast research.

[12]  J. Pronk,et al.  Prolonged selection in aerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes a partial loss of glycolytic capacity. , 2005, Microbiology.

[13]  David Botstein,et al.  Extrachromosomal circular DNA is common in yeast , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Yu Shen,et al.  Coutilization of D-Glucose, D-Xylose, and L-Arabinose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Coexpressing the Metabolic Pathways and Evolutionary Engineering , 2017, BioMed research international.

[15]  H. Westerhoff,et al.  Super life – how and why ‘cell selection’ leads to the fastest‐growing eukaryote , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[16]  J. Keasling,et al.  Recent applications of synthetic biology tools for yeast metabolic engineering. , 2014, FEMS yeast research.

[17]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Xylose isomerase overexpression along with engineering of the pentose phosphate pathway and evolutionary engineering enable rapid xylose utilization and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2012, Metabolic engineering.

[18]  A. Driessen,et al.  Engineering of an endogenous hexose transporter into a specific D-xylose transporter facilitates glucose-xylose co-consumption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2014, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[19]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Advances in metabolic engineering of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of chemicals , 2014, Biotechnology journal.

[20]  Avlant Nilsson,et al.  Metabolic Trade-offs in Yeast are Caused by F1F0-ATP synthase , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  J. Pronk,et al.  Mutations in PMR1 stimulate xylose isomerase activity and anaerobic growth on xylose of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae by influencing manganese homeostasis , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Jean-Marc Daran,et al.  The genome sequence of the popular hexose-transport-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain EBY.VW4000 reveals LoxP/Cre-induced translocations and gene loss. , 2015, FEMS yeast research.

[23]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Thermotolerant Yeast Strains Adapted by Laboratory Evolution Show Trade-Off at Ancestral Temperatures and Preadaptation to Other Stresses , 2015, mBio.

[24]  Jianhui Gong,et al.  Deep functional analysis of synII, a 770-kilobase synthetic yeast chromosome , 2017, Science.

[25]  Amir Feizi,et al.  Altered sterol composition renders yeast thermotolerant , 2014, Science.

[26]  Hal S Alper,et al.  In vivo continuous evolution of genes and pathways in yeast , 2016, Nature Communications.

[27]  H. Alper,et al.  An evolutionary metabolic engineering approach for enhancing lipogenesis in Yarrowia lipolytica. , 2015, Metabolic engineering.

[28]  Narendra Maheshri,et al.  Harnessing mutagenic homologous recombination for targeted mutagenesis in vivo by TaGTEAM , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  M. C. Hammond,et al.  Engineering and In Vivo Applications of Riboswitches. , 2017, Annual review of biochemistry.

[30]  C. Jubin,et al.  Mutational landscape of yeast mutator strains , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  K. Verstrepen,et al.  Adaptation to High Ethanol Reveals Complex Evolutionary Pathways , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[32]  Dick de Ridder,et al.  Genome duplication and mutations in ACE2 cause multicellular, fast-sedimenting phenotypes in evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Jan Marienhagen,et al.  Miniaturized and automated adaptive laboratory evolution: Evolving Corynebacterium glutamicum towards an improved d-xylose utilization. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[34]  J. Pronk,et al.  Laboratory Evolution of a Biotin-Requiring Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain for Full Biotin Prototrophy and Identification of Causal Mutations , 2017, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[35]  J. Pronk,et al.  Novel Evolutionary Engineering Approach for Accelerated Utilization of Glucose, Xylose, and Arabinose Mixtures by Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  Stefan Bruder,et al.  Engineering of yeast hexose transporters to transport d-xylose without inhibition by d-glucose , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Matthieu Legendre,et al.  Variable tandem repeats accelerate evolution of coding and regulatory sequences. , 2010, Annual review of genetics.

[38]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Batch and continuous culture-based selection strategies for acetic acid tolerance in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2011, FEMS yeast research.

[39]  Hal S Alper,et al.  Enabling tools for high-throughput detection of metabolites: Metabolic engineering and directed evolution applications. , 2017, Biotechnology advances.

[40]  I. Paulsen,et al.  Synthetic Evolution of Metabolic Productivity Using Biosensors. , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[41]  Johann F Görgens,et al.  Simultaneously improving xylose fermentation and tolerance to lignocellulosic inhibitors through evolutionary engineering of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbouring xylose isomerase , 2014, BMC Biotechnology.

[42]  J. Pronk,et al.  Minimal metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: a proof of principle. , 2004, FEMS yeast research.

[43]  D. Button Nutrient-limited microbial growth kinetics: overview and recent advances , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[44]  Yue Shen,et al.  3D organization of synthetic and scrambled chromosomes , 2017, Science.

[45]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Thermotolerant yeasts selected by adaptive evolution express heat stress response at 30 °C , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[46]  Pooja K. Strope,et al.  Structures of Naturally Evolved CUP1 Tandem Arrays in Yeast Indicate That These Arrays Are Generated by Unequal Nonhomologous Recombination , 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[47]  U. Sauer Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes. , 2001, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[48]  J. Pronk,et al.  Industrial Relevance of Chromosomal Copy Number Variation in Saccharomyces Yeasts , 2017, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[49]  Verena Siewers,et al.  From flavors and pharmaceuticals to advanced biofuels: production of isoprenoids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2013, Biotechnology journal.

[50]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[51]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  Pervasive Genetic Hitchhiking and Clonal Interference in 40 Evolving Yeast Populations , 2013, Nature.

[52]  Martin Dragosits,et al.  Adaptive laboratory evolution – principles and applications for biotechnology , 2013, Microbial Cell Factories.

[53]  Nikolaus Sonnenschein,et al.  Evolution reveals a glutathione-dependent mechanism of 3-hydroxypropionic acid tolerance. , 2014, Metabolic engineering.

[54]  J. Pronk,et al.  A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations , 2016, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[55]  Stanley Fields,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing of a laboratory-evolved yeast strain , 2010, BMC genomics.

[56]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Laboratory Evolution to Alternating Substrate Environments Yields Distinct Phenotypic and Genetic Adaptive Strategies , 2017, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[57]  Hal S Alper,et al.  Biosensor‐Enabled Directed Evolution to Improve Muconic Acid Production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2017, Biotechnology journal.

[58]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Experimental Evolution Reveals Favored Adaptive Routes to Cell Aggregation in Yeast , 2016, Genetics.

[59]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Analyzing the genomic variation of microbial cell factories in the era of “New Biotechnology” , 2012, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[60]  H. Alper,et al.  Enabling glucose/xylose co-transport in yeast through the directed evolution of a sugar transporter , 2016, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[61]  Johannes H. de Winde,et al.  Prolonged Maltose-Limited Cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Selects for Cells with Improved Maltose Affinity and Hypersensitivity , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[62]  J. Pronk,et al.  Engineering topology and kinetics of sucrose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol yield. , 2011, Metabolic engineering.

[63]  F. Bruggeman,et al.  How Biochemical Constraints of Cellular Growth Shape Evolutionary Adaptations in Metabolism , 2013, Genetics.

[64]  Jack T. Pronk,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9: a molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2015, FEMS yeast research.

[65]  Jing Li,et al.  De novo yeast genome assemblies from MinION, PacBio and MiSeq platforms , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[66]  Jorge Duitama,et al.  The sole introduction of two single-point mutations establishes glycerol utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK derivatives , 2017, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[67]  Hans C. Bernstein,et al.  Microbial Consortia Engineering for Cellular Factories: in vitro to in silico systems , 2012, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[68]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Discovery and engineering of a 1-butanol biosensor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[69]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  Metabolic Engineering of Glycerol Production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[70]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Turbidostat culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303-1A under selective pressure elicited by ethanol selects for mutations in SSD1 and UTH1. , 2012, FEMS yeast research.

[71]  A. Kondo,et al.  Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems , 2016, Science.

[72]  J. Pronk,et al.  Evolutionary Engineering in Chemostat Cultures for Improved Maltotriose Fermentation Kinetics in Saccharomyces pastorianus Lager Brewing Yeast , 2017, Front. Microbiol..

[73]  Luis H. Reyes,et al.  Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced tolerance to hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass , 2013, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[74]  Thomas Abeel,et al.  Nanopore sequencing enables near-complete de novo assembly of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reference strain CEN.PK113-7D , 2017, bioRxiv.

[75]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Evolution of E. coli on [U-13C]Glucose Reveals a Negligible Isotopic Influence on Metabolism and Physiology , 2016, PloS one.

[76]  J. Pronk,et al.  Genome-wide analytical approaches for reverse metabolic engineering of industrially relevant phenotypes in yeast , 2012, FEMS yeast research.

[77]  J. Pronk,et al.  Genome-scale analyses of butanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveal an essential role of protein degradation , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[78]  Luis H. Reyes,et al.  Improving carotenoids production in yeast via adaptive laboratory evolution. , 2014, Metabolic engineering.

[79]  Lisbeth Olsson,et al.  Evolutionary engineering strategies to enhance tolerance of xylose utilizing recombinant yeast to inhibitors derived from spruce biomass , 2012, Biotechnology for Biofuels.