Directionality principles in thermodynamics and evolution.

Directionality in populations of replicating organisms can be parametrized in terms of a statistical concept: evolutionary entropy. This parameter, a measure of the variability in the age of reproducing individuals in a population, is isometric with the macroscopic variable body size. Evolutionary trends in entropy due to mutation and natural selection fall into patterns modulated by ecological and demographic constraints, which are delineated as follows: (i) density-dependent conditions (a unidirectional increase in evolutionary entropy), and (ii) density-independent conditions, (a) slow exponential growth (an increase in entropy); (b) rapid exponential growth, low degree of iteroparity (a decrease in entropy); and (c) rapid exponential growth, high degree of iteroparity (random, nondirectional change in entropy). Directionality in aggregates of inanimate matter can be parametrized in terms of the statistical concept, thermodynamic entropy, a measure of disorder. Directional trends in entropy in aggregates of matter fall into patterns determined by the nature of the adiabatic constraints, which are characterized as follows: (i) irreversible processes (an increase in thermodynamic entropy) and (ii) reversible processes (a constant value for entropy). This article analyzes the relation between the concepts that underlie the directionality principles in evolutionary biology and physical systems. For models of cellular populations, an analytic relation is derived between generation time, the average length of the cell cycle, and temperature. This correspondence between generation time, an evolutionary parameter, and temperature, a thermodynamic variable, is exploited to show that the increase in evolutionary entropy that characterizes population processes under density-dependent conditions represents a nonequilibrium analogue of the second law of thermodynamics.

[1]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  Evolution as entropy: Toward a unified theory of biology , 1987 .

[2]  Michael J. Reiss,et al.  The allometry of growth and reproduction , 1989 .

[3]  J H Gillespie,et al.  Nautural selection for within-generation variance in offspring number. , 1974, Genetics.

[4]  L. Arnold,et al.  Evolutionary Formalism for Products of Positive Random Matrices , 1994 .

[5]  S. Karlin R. A. Fisher and Evolutionary Theory , 1992 .

[6]  I. Good,et al.  Ergodic theory and information , 1966 .

[7]  L. Demetrius,et al.  The measurement of Darwinian fitness in human populations , 1984, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  J. Kingman,et al.  Mathematics of genetic diversity , 1982 .

[9]  W. Calder Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[10]  Lloyd Demetrius,et al.  Growth rate, population entropy, and evolutionary dynamics , 1992 .

[11]  L. Demetrius,et al.  Demographic parameters and natural selection. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[13]  P. Kitcher,et al.  The Dialectical Biologist. , 1989 .

[14]  S. Karlin,et al.  Temporal fluctuations in selection intensities: Case of small population size , 1974 .

[15]  W. Ewens Mathematical Population Genetics , 1980 .

[16]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[17]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Why use population entropy? It determines the rate of convergence , 1982 .

[18]  The units of selection and measures of fitness , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[19]  L. Demetrius The thermodynamics of evolution , 1992 .

[20]  Jeffrey S. Wicken,et al.  Evolution, thermodynamics and information , 1987 .

[21]  Motoo Kimura,et al.  Diffusion models in population genetics , 1964, Journal of Applied Probability.

[22]  Agnessa Babloyantz,et al.  Thermodynamics of evolution , 1972 .

[23]  Lloyd Demetrius,et al.  Statistical mechanics and population biology , 1983 .