Heedful Interrelating in three modes: Reliability versus Performance in French Fighter Pilot Squadrons

In this paper we explore the way that the cognitive and behavioural resources of heedfully interrelating agents are distributed across the competing claims for attention from, respectively reliability and performance, both under collaborative and adversarial conditions, and in circumstances in which the scope for sense making varies with the complexity and uncertainty of the environment. Such resources are deployed with varying degrees of embodiment. At one extreme, agent knowledge is embodied to the point that, while it may be expressed, it cannot be articulated. At the other, such knowledge can be readily externalized in an abstract symbolic form. In between we have knowledge that can be verbalized although with limited possibilities for being expressed in an abstract-symbolic way. We illustrate the nature of the trade off between reliability and performance by comparing the behaviours of two French fighter pilot squadrons, one concerned with air display and one with air combat.

[1]  Max Boisot,et al.  Explorations in Information Space: Knowledge, Agents, and Organization , 2007 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[3]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[4]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[5]  Gerald P. O'Driscoll,et al.  The economics of time and ignorance , 1987 .

[6]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[7]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[8]  K. Weick The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[9]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[10]  M. Boisot,et al.  Speeding Up Strategic Foresight in a Dangerous and Complex World: A Complexity Approach , 2006 .

[11]  K. Weick The Vulnerable System: An Analysis of the Tenerife Air Disaster , 1990 .

[12]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[13]  I. Janis Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[14]  N. Wiley,et al.  The Micro-Macro Problem in Social Theory , 1988 .

[15]  N. Chater,et al.  Concepts and Similarity , 1997 .

[16]  John Tyler Bonner,et al.  First Signals: The Evolution of Multicellular Development , 2000 .

[17]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[18]  Yossi Sheffi,et al.  The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[19]  John Child,et al.  Organizations As Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: the Case of China , 1999 .

[20]  A. Clark,et al.  Supersizing The Mind Embodiment Action And Cognitive Extension Andy Clark , 2016 .

[21]  W. James,et al.  Pragmatism and Other Writings , 2000 .

[22]  S. Toulmin Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity , 1990 .

[23]  P. Thagard,et al.  Coherence in Thought and Action , 2000 .

[24]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[25]  C. Perrow Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1970 .

[26]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[27]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[28]  M. Bougon Cognition in Organizations: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. , 1977 .

[29]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[30]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[31]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI , 1999 .

[33]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .