Reversing the Tyranny of Distance Education: Using Research About Threshold Concepts in Online Teaching to Humanize Online Course Design

In today’s higher education environment, online education has become a rich and nuanced medium characterized by a dynamic and progressive use of technology. These technological advancements require research-informed guidelines and practices to facilitate understanding of how they can be used to foster positive outcomes in distance education contexts. By employing a mixed-methods multiphase design case study at Avondale College of Higher Education, the authors examine the challenges, selfconfidence and threshold concepts, or transformative, conceptual understandings that academic faculty staff experience while engaging in distance education course design. The authors examine how these threshold concepts, attitudes and skills can be used to inform the design of professional development programs for academic staff who teach in online contexts. The results and associated recommendations of the six-year investigation are presented to inform professional development programs that aim to improve the quality of online teaching, course design and learning experiences of students. Reversing the Tyranny of Distance Education: Using Research About Threshold Concepts in Online Teaching to Humanize Online Course Design

[1]  Hilda Borko,et al.  Facilitating Video-Based Professional Development: Planning and Orchestrating Productive Discussions , 2014 .

[2]  Arlene Johnson.  A Nursing Faculty's TRANSITION to Teaching Online , 2008, Nursing education perspectives.

[3]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Authentic learning on the web: Guidelines for course design , 2007 .

[4]  UnidosUS.  Blended Learning Toolkit , 2017 .

[5]  Daniel Reynaud,et al.  Navigating Learning Journeys of Online Teachers: Threshold Concepts and Self-efficacy , 2015 .

[6]  Karen Kear,et al.  Social presence in online learning communities: the role of personal profiles , 2014 .

[7]  B. Rienties,et al.  The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers' beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology , 2013 .

[8]  Steve Drew,et al.  The literature landscape of blended learning in higher education: the need for better understanding of academic blended practice , 2013 .

[9]  Lisa Bloom,et al.  Online Course Design: A Case Study , 2008 .

[10]  J. Creswell,et al.  Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods , 2007 .

[11]  Janet Macdonald,et al.  Designing the professional development of staff for teaching online: an OU (UK) case study , 2011 .

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .

[13]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Nancy Chism.  Using a Framework to Engage Faculty in Instructional Technologies , 2004 .

[15]  K. Yoon,et al.  What Works in Professional Development? , 2009 .

[16]  Z. Berge,et al.  Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study , 2005 .

[17]  R. Land.  Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (1): linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines , 2003 .

[18]  Patricia Kearney,et al.  Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator , 1996 .

[19]  Robyn Benson,et al.  Addressing the context of e‐learning: using transactional distance theory to inform design , 2009 .

[20]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[21]  B. Fox,et al.  Blended Learning Innovations: Leadership and Change in One Australian Institution. , 2015 .

[22]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning , 2005 .

[23]  Lee Chye Seng,et al.  Humanizing e-learning , 2003, Proceedings. 2003 International Conference on Cyberworlds.

[24]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis , 2005 .

[25]  Athanassios Jimoyiannis,et al.  Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Loneliness and social uses of the Internet , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[28]  David Kember,et al.  Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning , 1993 .

[29]  Mary L. Anderson,et al.  Online teaching efficacy of nurse faculty. , 2010, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[30]  Peter Leong.  Role of social presence and cognitive absorption in online learning environments , 2011 .

[31]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Competences for online teaching: A special report , 2001 .

[32]  Janet E. Dyment,et al.  Teacher Educators' Readiness, Preparation, and Perceptions of Preparing Preservice Teachers in a Fully Online Environment: An Exploratory Study , 2013 .

[33]  D. Garrison,et al.  The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. , 2008 .

[34]  Ann D. Thompson,et al.  Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers , 2011 .

[35]  Guglielmo Trentin.  Metaphor: the educational mediator , 2000 .

[36]  A. Espasa,et al.  University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: a theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices , 2009 .

[37]  Spencer Benson,et al.  Learning with Invisible Others: Perceptions of Online Presence and their Relationship to Cognitive and Affective Learning , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[38]  S. Ellis,et al.  Looking out and looking in: Exploring a case of faculty perceptions during e-learning staff development , 2013 .

[39]  Casey Frechette,et al.  New Model, New Strategies: Instructional design for building online wisdom communities , 2006 .

[40]  Sue Walker,et al.  Blackboard as an online learning environment : what do teacher education students and staff think? , 2011 .

[41]  Yurui Zhen,et al.  Investigating the Factors Affecting Faculty Members' Decision to Teach or Not to Teach Online in Higher Education , 2008 .

[42]  L.S. Tesdell,et al.  Instructor Time and Effort in Online and Face-to-Face Teaching: Lessons Learned , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[43]  M. Glogowska,et al.  How 'blended' is blended learning?: students' perceptions of issues around the integration of online and face-to-face learning in a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) health care context. , 2011, Nurse education today.

[44]  Lydia Mbati,et al.  Online Social Media Applications for Constructivism and Observational Learning. , 2013 .

[45]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[46]  S. Volet,et al.  ‘I don’t think I could, you know, just teach without any emotion’: exploring the nature and origin of university teachers’ emotions , 2014 .