Anatomical Models: a Digital Revolution

The use of three-dimensional (3D) anatomical models is ubiquitous in medical education. Medical educators rely on models to depict anatomical structures in a more efficient format than the cadaver; to move away from the clutter, discomfort, and complexity of a cadaveric dissection; and to clarify characteristics or functions of an anatomical structure that are not readily apparent in situ. Here, we review the use of physical anatomical models in teaching anatomical sciences in medical education. In addition, we examine the production of digital 3D models for interactive media and the production of physical models of anatomical structures using additive manufacturing (3D printing) methods. Finally, we examine methods of implementation of these visual and tactile resources in medical curricula. This review is intended as a primer for educators contemplating on the use of these learning objects in medical education.

[1]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Computer visualizations: Factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[2]  Justin W. Adams,et al.  The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology , 2014, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  Sarah B. Williams,et al.  “Let's Get Physical”: Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[4]  David A Cook,et al.  Computer animations in medical education: a critical literature review , 2009, Medical education.

[5]  Kevin Fung,et al.  Evaluation of a three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction. , 2010, Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale.

[6]  P. Azimi,et al.  Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers , 2013 .

[7]  A. Khurana,et al.  The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[8]  A. Valdecasas,et al.  Understanding complex systems: lessons from Auzoux’s and von Hagens’s anatomical models , 2009, Journal of Biosciences.

[9]  Liang Hou,et al.  Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review , 2013 .

[10]  B. Wainman,et al.  The relative effectiveness of computer‐based and traditional resources for education in anatomy , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[11]  Theo van der Meer,et al.  Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. & Biomed. Sci. , 2008 .

[12]  R. Mayer.  Applying the science of learning to medical education , 2010, Medical education.

[13]  R. Moreno.  Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods , 2007 .

[14]  F. Paas,et al.  Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective , 2007 .

[15]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Automated segmentation of pulmonary structures in thoracic computed tomography scans: a review , 2013 .

[16]  Friedrich Paulsen,et al.  The dissection course - necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. , 2008, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[17]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Is There Any Real Virtue of Virtual Reality?: The Minor Role of Multiple Orientations in Learning Anatomy from Computers , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  N. Hopwood.  Embryos in Wax: Models from the Ziegler Studio , 2002 .

[19]  K. Fung,et al.  Role of a computer-generated three-dimensional laryngeal model in anatomy teaching for advanced learners , 2011, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[20]  M. A. Casberg.  The art of medicine. , 1952, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[21]  Patricia S O'Sullivan,et al.  Comparison of traditional methods with 3D computer models in the instruction of hepatobiliary anatomy , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[22]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Three‐dimensional visualisation improves understanding of surgical liver anatomy , 2010, Medical education.

[23]  Jorge G Ruiz,et al.  Learning objects in medical education , 2006, Medical teacher.

[24]  M. Shapi,et al.  Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of some potential toxicants amongst volatile compounds emitted during large-scale thermal degradation of poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) plastic. , 1991, Journal of chromatography.

[25]  Timothy D Wilson,et al.  Explorable three‐dimensional digital model of the female pelvis, pelvic contents, and perineum for anatomical education , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[26]  Claudia B. Douglass,et al.  Plastination: Preservation Technology Enhances Biology Teaching , 2003 .

[27]  Zarina Samsudin,et al.  Tangible Multimedia: A Case Study for Bringing Tangibility into Multimedia Learning , 2012 .

[28]  Cristiano Quintini,et al.  Three‐dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation , 2013, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[29]  Kaida Xiao,et al.  Developing a 3D colour image reproduction system for additive manufacturing of facial prostheses , 2014 .

[30]  Bernd W. Becker,et al.  Digital Learning Object Repositories , 2010 .

[31]  Frederik L. Giesel,et al.  3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[32]  R. Ballestriero,et al.  Anatomical models and wax Venuses: art masterpieces or scientific craft works? , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[33]  Yoshihiko Maehara,et al.  Transplantation: 3D printing of the liver in living donor liver transplantation , 2013, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[34]  Anna Maerker.  Florentine anatomical models and the challenge of medical authority in late-eighteenth-century Vienna. , 2012, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[35]  M. Schaper,et al.  Respiratory responses of mice exposed to thermal decomposition products from polymers heated at and above workplace processing temperatures. , 1994, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal.

[36]  Nicholas W. Farha.  An exploratory study into the efficacy of learning objects , 2009 .

[37]  Cory Hughart,et al.  Human Development: Development of the Face and Palate , 2011 .

[38]  John A McNulty,et al.  Evaluation of computer‐aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six‐year study , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[39]  Jan A. Witkowski,et al.  Embryos in Wax. Models from the Ziegler Studio , 2002 .

[40]  Katerina V. Thompson,et al.  Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions. , 2014, Advances in physiology education.

[41]  Linda Murray,et al.  Let's get physical. , 2008, International journal of mental health nursing.

[42]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Tangibles for learning: a representational analysis of physical manipulation , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[43]  K F Russell,et al.  Ivory anatomical manikins. , 1972, Medical History.

[44]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[45]  Matthias Ketzel,et al.  Association between short-term exposure to ultrafine particles and hospital admissions for stroke in Copenhagen, Denmark. , 2010, European heart journal.

[46]  Xiahai Zhuang,et al.  Challenges and methodologies of fully automatic whole heart segmentation: a review. , 2013, Journal of healthcare engineering.

[47]  L Dacome,et al.  Review of Nick Hopwood, Embryos in wax: models from the Ziegler studio (Cambridge and Bern: Whipple Museum for the History of Science, University of Cambridge and Institute of the History of Medicine, University of Bern, 2002) , 2004 .

[48]  Eric Kerfoot,et al.  Share and enjoy: anatomical models database—generating and sharing cardiovascular model data using web services , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[49]  Garry Falloon,et al.  Digital Learning Objects: A Need for Educational Leadership , 2009 .

[50]  R. L. Guyer.  Metamorphosis: Beautiful Education to Smarmy Edutainment , 2007, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[51]  Anna Maerker,et al.  Anatomizing the Trade: Designing and Marketing Anatomical Models as Medical Technologies, ca. 1700-1900 , 2013 .

[52]  Jodie Jenkinson,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Educational Technology: What Are We Attempting to Measure?. , 2009 .

[53]  Alessandro Riva,et al.  The evolution of anatomical illustration and wax modelling in Italy from the 16th to early 19th centuries , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[54]  Wojciech Pawlina,et al.  Anatomical models: Don't banish them from the anatomy laboratory yet , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[55]  Z. Tehrani,et al.  3D additive manufacture of oral and maxillofacial surgical models for preoperative planning , 2014 .

[56]  S. Lozanoff.  Re‐inventing anatomy: The impact of plastination on how we see the human body , 2002, Clinical anatomy.

[57]  H. Schulz,et al.  Dosimetry and toxicology of inhaled ultrafine particles , 2009, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[58]  Mika Salmi,et al.  Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing). , 2013, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[59]  Marek Hatala,et al.  The Evolution of Learning Object Repository Technologies: Portals for On-line Objects for Learning , 2002 .

[60]  A. Peters,et al.  Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[61]  Robert John Winder,et al.  Three-Dimensional Micro-Imaging (μCT) Based Physical Anatomic Teaching Models: Implementation of a New Learning Aid for Routine Use in Anatomy Lectures , 2012, MMVR.

[62]  G. Hagens.  Impregnation of soft biological specimens with thermosetting resins and elastomers , 1979, The Anatomical record.

[63]  Adir Cohen,et al.  Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[64]  U. Kodavanti,et al.  Manufactured and airborne nanoparticle cardiopulmonary interactions: a review of mechanisms and the possible contribution of mast cells , 2012, Inhalation toxicology.

[65]  D. J. Lowrie,et al.  Medical student retention of embryonic development: Impact of the dimensions added by multimedia tutorials , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[66]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[67]  Sara Kim,et al.  Applying the cognitive theory of multimedia learning: an analysis of medical animations , 2013, Medical education.

[68]  Peter Angelos,et al.  The ethical challenges of surgical innovation for patient care , 2010, The Lancet.

[69]  R. Latorre,et al.  How useful is plastination in learning anatomy? , 2007, Journal of veterinary medical education.