Girls and Computers - Yes We Can!: A Case Study on Improving Female Computer Confidence and Decreasing Gender Inequity in Computer Science with an Informal, Female Learning Community

This research was designed to increase the awareness of female students with regard to Computer Science (CS) as both a major and a career field. Five female students from a high school in a northeastern state were voluntarily recruited for a weekly, after-school computer club curriculum for one academic year. Over the project period, participants ventured through tasks relating to various technologies, thereby increasing their computer confidence. Collaboration preferences increased only when faced with both technical and content knowledge. Participants’ understanding of CS changed from abstract and superficial to more concrete, but disinterest in the major persisted. Finally, while the participants’ perceptions of gender differences changed, some of the self-reflections did not match their responses to structured questions. While the project impacted only a small sample, increased knowledge of the field of CS prevailed. If females are educated earlier, this may cause a noticeable shift in gender inequity amongst CS majors. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-456-7.ch5.4

[1]  Lori Carter Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science , 2006, SIGCSE '06.

[2]  Alexander Baumeister,et al.  Activity Driven Budgeting of Software Projects , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof..

[3]  Ibrahim Esan Olaosun,et al.  Visualization of Communication in Some Mobile Phone Directory and Call Log Icons , 2012 .

[4]  Maria M. Klawe,et al.  Women in computing---take 2 , 2009, CACM.

[5]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[6]  Amar Almasude,et al.  E-Education Applications: Human Factors and Innovative Approaches , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Teens, privacy and online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace , 2007 .

[8]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Motivation and nonmajors in computer science: identifying discrete audiences for introductory courses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[9]  Maria Kordaki,et al.  Critical factors influencing secondary school pupil’s decisions to study computing in tertiary education: Gender differences , 2007, Education and Information Technologies.

[10]  A. Christie How Adolescent Boys and Girls View Today's Computer Culture , 2005 .

[11]  Marc J. Natale The effect of a male-oriented computer gaming culture on careers in the computer industry , 2002, CSOC.

[12]  William Aspray,et al.  A Critical Review of the Research on Women's Participation in Postsecondary Computing Education , 2008 .

[13]  Robert G. Fuller,et al.  Fostering Meaningful Interaction in Health Education Online Courses: Matching Pedagogy to Course Types , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[14]  Michael S. Teitelbaum Why Do We Neglect Workforce Demand? , 2006 .

[15]  Roli Varma,et al.  Women in Information Technology: A Case Study of Undergraduate Students in a Minority-Serving Institution , 2002 .

[16]  Rachael Knight,et al.  Encyclopedia of Distance Learning , 2005 .

[17]  Festus Prosper Olise ICTs and Indigenous Languages as Agents for the Actualization of Millennium Development Goals in Nigeria , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[18]  Marina Papastergiou,et al.  Gender issues in Internet access and favourite Internet activities among Greek high school pupils inside and outside school , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[19]  J. Cooper,et al.  The digital divide: the special case of gender , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Han Reichgelt,et al.  Women in computing programs: does the incredible shrinking pipeline apply to all computing programs? , 2003, SGCS.

[21]  J. Schofield Computers and classroom culture , 1995 .

[22]  Sandra Katz,et al.  Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program , 2006, DATB.

[23]  Teri Perl,et al.  Priming the pipeline , 2002, SGCS.

[24]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  What is computing?: bridging the gap between teenagers' perceptions and graduate students' experiences , 2007, ICER '07.

[25]  Brian Dorn,et al.  A statistical analysis of student performance in online computer science courses , 2004 .

[26]  Deirdre Lee,et al.  Context-Aware Pervasive Services for Smart Cities , 2011 .

[27]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Computers for communication, not calculation: media as a motivation and context for learning , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[28]  C. Steele,et al.  Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  A. Colley,et al.  Age and gender differences in computer use and attitudes among secondary school students: what has changed? , 2003 .

[30]  S. E. Kruck,et al.  Technology Majors: Why are Women Absent? , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  'Because it's boring, irrelevant and I don't like computers': Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[33]  Allan Chen,et al.  A new collaborative software package: TeamSpace at Stanford University , 2005, SIGUCCS '05.

[34]  Lawrence A. Tomei ICTs for Modern Educational and Instructional Advancement: New Approaches to Teaching , 2009 .

[35]  Lisa M. Olivieri,et al.  High school environments and girls' interest in computer science , 2005, SGCS.

[36]  Roli Varma,et al.  Importance of gender homophily in the computer science classroom , 2007, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[37]  International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education , 2022 .

[38]  Heinrich Theodor Vierhaus,et al.  Design and Test Technology for Dependable Systems-on-Chip , 2010 .

[39]  Jeffrey A. Stone,et al.  Gender, perceptions, and reality: technological literacy among first-year students , 2007, SIGCSE '07.

[40]  Liliana Favre Model Driven Architecture for Reverse Engineering Technologies: Strategic Directions and System Evolution , 2010 .

[41]  C. Candace Chou,et al.  Collaboration and the importance for novices in learning java computer programming , 2007, ITiCSE.

[42]  Basabi Chakraborty,et al.  Kansei Engineering and Soft Computing: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[43]  Pat Byrne,et al.  The effect of student attributes on success in programming , 2001 .

[44]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  The current crisis in computing: what are the real issues? , 2007, SIGCSE '07.

[45]  Lori Pollock,et al.  Increasing high school girls' self confidence and awareness of CS through a positive summer experience , 2004 .

[46]  Yasmin A. Rios-Solis,et al.  Piece-Mold-Machine Manufacturing Planning , 2010 .

[47]  Paul H. White,et al.  Investigating a Measure of Computer Technology Domain Identification: A Tool for Understanding Gender Differences and Stereotypes , 2005 .

[48]  Joy Teague,et al.  Women in computing: what brings them to it, what keeps them in it? , 2002, SGCS.

[49]  Kenji Sugawara,et al.  Analyzing Coordinate Relations in Handwriting Activity: Tacit Skill and Individuality , 2011 .

[50]  Doris L. Carver,et al.  Shortchanging the future of information technology: the untapped resource , 2002, SGCS.

[51]  Joanna Goode,et al.  Lost in Translation: Gender and High School Computer Science , 2006 .

[52]  Lucia A. Gilbert,et al.  Sex of faculty role model and students' self-perceptions of competency , 1983 .

[53]  J. Jenson,et al.  Girl talk: gender, equity, and identity discourses in a school-based computer culture , 2003 .

[54]  Heinrich Theodor Vierhaus,et al.  Self-Repair Technology for Global Interconnects on SoCs , 2011 .

[55]  Ellen Spertus,et al.  Developing a hardware and programming curriculum for middle school girls , 2002, SGCS.

[56]  Raymond R. Panko,et al.  IT employment prospects: beyond the dotcom bubble , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Qing Li,et al.  Towards a Personalized E-Learning System , 2005 .

[58]  Marjolein Drent,et al.  Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  P. Doerschuk,et al.  A research and mentoring program for undergraduate women in computer science , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[60]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  A CS1 course designed to address interests of women , 2004 .

[61]  Elizabeth Johnson,et al.  Still a stranger here: attitudes among secondary school students towards computer science , 2003 .

[62]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  Pair dynamics in team collaboration , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[63]  Sylvia Beyer,et al.  Changes in CS students' sttitudes towards CS over time: an examination of gender differences , 2005 .

[64]  Henry MacKay Walker CURRICULAR SYNCOPATIONSThe role of programming in introductory computing courses , 2010, INROADS.

[65]  Juan Contreras-Castillo,et al.  Supporting Informal Interaction in Online Courses , 2004 .

[66]  Ned Kock,et al.  Media Naturalness Reduction and Compensatory Channel Expansion: A Study of Online and Face-to-Face Sections of the Same Course , 2011, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[67]  David A. Stuart,et al.  Broadening participation in computing: issues and challenges , 2007, ITiCSE.

[68]  Paul Roe,et al.  Archiving nature's heartbeat using smartphones , 2010 .