Combating VR sickness through subtle dynamic field-of-view modification

Virtual Reality (VR) sickness can cause intense discomfort, shorten the duration of a VR experience, and create an aversion to further use of VR. High-quality tracking systems can minimize the mismatch between a user's visual perception of the virtual environment (VE) and the response of their vestibular system, diminishing VR sickness for moving users. However, this does not help users who do not or cannot move physically the way they move virtually, because of preference or physical limitations such as a disability. It has been noted that decreasing field of view (FOV) tends to decrease VR sickness, though at the expense of sense of presence. To address this tradeoff, we explore the effect of dynamically, yet subtly, changing a physically stationary person's FOV in response to visually perceived motion as they virtually traverse a VE. We report the results of a two-session, multi-day study with 30 participants. Each participant was seated in a stationary chair, wearing a stereoscopic head-worn display, and used control and FOV-modifying conditions in the same VE. Our data suggests that by strategically and automatically manipulating FOV during a VR session, we can reduce the degree of VR sickness perceived by participants and help them adapt to VR, without decreasing their subjective level of presence, and minimizing their awareness of the intervention.

[1]  Michael Venturino,et al.  Performance and head movements using a helmet-mounted display with different sized fields-of-view , 1990 .

[2]  R S Kennedy,et al.  Use of a motion sickness history questionnaire for prediction of simulator sickness. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments , 2000, CHI.

[4]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments , 2000, SGCH.

[5]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems , 2008, Displays.

[6]  Randy F. Pausch,et al.  A Literature Survey for Virtual Environments: Military Flight Simulator Visual Systems and Simulator Sickness , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Ferran Argelaguet Adaptive navigation for virtual environments , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[8]  M L Cook,et al.  Simulator Sickness Scores According to Symptom Susceptibility, Age, and Gender for an Older Driver Assessment Study , 2006 .

[9]  James R. Lackner,et al.  Circumventing Side Effects of Immersive Virtual Environments , 1997, HCI.

[10]  Charles B. Owen,et al.  Individual variation in susceptibility to cybersickness , 2014, UIST.

[11]  D. Simons,et al.  Change Blindness in the Absence of a Visual Disruption , 2000, Perception.

[12]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Perception of Self-motion and Presence in Auditory Virtual Environments , 2004 .

[13]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence , 2016 .

[14]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[15]  Julie M. Drexler,et al.  Cybersickness is Not Simulator Sickness , 1997 .

[16]  Zachary Wartell,et al.  Leveraging change blindness for redirection in virtual environments , 2011, 2011 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[17]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[18]  D. Simons,et al.  CHAPTER 13 – Change Blindness , 2005 .

[19]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Duration and Exposure to Virtual Environments: Sickness Curves During and Across Sessions , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[20]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  The psychometrics of cybersickness , 1997, CACM.

[21]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Simulator sickness and presence in a high FOV virtual environment , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001.

[22]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[23]  Christine Youngblut What a Decade of Experiments Reveals about Factors that Influence the Sense of Presence: Latest Findings , 2006 .

[24]  Kwang Suk Park,et al.  The Application of Biosignal Feedback for Reducing Cybersickness from Exposure to a Virtual Environment , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[25]  Eugenia M. Kolasinski,et al.  Simulator Sickness in Virtual Environments. , 1995 .

[26]  Michael E. McCauley,et al.  Cybersickness: Perception of Self-Motion in Virtual Environments , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[27]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  Redirected Walking , 2001, Eurographics.