Ecological biogeography of North American mammals: species density and ecological structure in relation to environmental gradients

Aim  To evaluate the relationship of climate and physiography to species density and ecological diversity of North American mammals. Location  North America, including Mexico and Central America. Methods  Species density, size structure and trophic structure of mammalian faunas and nine environmental variables were documented for quadrats covering the entire continent. Spatial autocorrelation of species density and the environmental variables illustrated differences in their spatial structure at the continental scale. We used principal component analysis to reduce the dimensionality of the climatic variables, linear multiple regression to determine which environmental variables best predict species density for the continent and several regions of the continent, and canonical ordination to evaluate how well the environmental variables predict ecological structure of mammalian faunas over North America. Results  In the best regression model, five environmental variables, representing seasonal extremes of temperature, annual energy and moisture, and elevation, predicted 88% of the variation in species density for the whole continent. Among different regions of North America, the environmental variables that predicted species density vary. Changes in the size and trophic structure of mammalian faunas accompany changes in species density. Redundancy analysis demonstrated that environmental variables representing winter temperature, frostfree period, potential and actual evapotranspiration, and elevation account for 77% of the variation in ecological structure. Main conclusions  The latitudinal gradient in mammalian species density is strong, but most of it is explained by variation in the environmental variables. Each ecological category peaks in species richness under particular environmental conditions. The changes of greatest magnitude involve the smallest size categories (< 10 g, 11–100 g), aerial insectivores and frugivores. Species in these categories, mostly bats, increase along a gradient of decreasing winter temperature and increasing annual moisture and frostfree period, trends correlated with latitude. At the opposite end of this gradient, species in the largest size category (101–1000 kg) increase in frequency. Species in size categories 3 (101–1000 g), 5 (11–100 kg) and 6 (101–1000 kg), herbivores, and granivores increase along a longitudinal gradient of increasing annual potential evapotranspiration and elevation. Much of the spatial pattern is consistent with ecological sorting of species ranges along environmental gradients, but differential rates of speciation and extinction also may have shaped the ecological diversity of extant North American mammals.

[1]  D. Janzen,et al.  Neotropical Anachronisms: The Fruits the Gomphotheres Ate , 1982, Science.

[2]  Peter Andrews,et al.  Climate, vegetation, and predictable gradients in mammal species richness in southern Africa , 2000 .

[3]  M. C. F. Proctor,et al.  Biogeography: an Ecological and Evolutionary Approach. , 1974 .

[4]  L. Hamilton 217-249 inRegression with Graphics: A Second Course in Applied Statistics , 1991 .

[5]  Peter D. Moore,et al.  Biogeography: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach , 1974 .

[6]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  The Mammalian Radiations: An Analysis of Trends in Evolution, Adaptation, and Behavior , 1981 .

[7]  D. Currie Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[8]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[9]  R. Graham,et al.  Environmental fluctuations and evolution of mammalian faunas during the last deglaciation in North America , 1987 .

[10]  R. Manville,et al.  The Mammals of North America , 1959 .

[11]  D. Grayson Late Pleistocene mammalian extinctions in North America: Taxonomy, chronology, and explanations , 1991 .

[12]  M. Rosenzweig Species Diversity Gradients: We Know More and Less Than We Thought , 1992 .

[13]  J. Cracraft Biological diversification and its causes , 1985 .

[14]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Species diversity in ecological communities: edited by Robert E. Ricklefs and Dolph Schluter University of Chicago Press, 1993. $105.00 hbk, $35.00 pbk (414 pages) ISBN 0 226 71822 0/0 226 71823 9 , 1994 .

[15]  H. Gregory McDonald,et al.  Spatial Response of Mammals to Late Quaternary Environmental Fluctuations , 1996, Science.

[16]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  Species Density of North American Recent Mammals , 1964 .

[17]  Jeremy T. Kerr,et al.  Habitat heterogeneity as a determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions , 1997, Nature.

[18]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Applied Linear Regression (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[19]  R. Nowak,et al.  Walker's mammals of the world , 1968 .

[20]  David J. Currie,et al.  Large-scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of trees , 1987, Nature.

[21]  C. Stults,et al.  A Numerical Analysis of the Distributional Patterns of North American Mammals , 1964 .

[22]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[23]  E. C. Pielou A naturalist's guide to the Arctic , 1994 .

[24]  N. W. PIRIE,et al.  Biological Diversity , 1964 .

[25]  J. Betancourt,et al.  Vegetation history of the deserts of southwestern North America: the nature and timing of the late W , 1987 .

[26]  R. Sokal,et al.  Applications of Spatial Autocorrelation in Ecology , 1987 .

[27]  M. Rosenzweig Net Primary Productivity of Terrestrial Communities: Prediction from Climatological Data , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[28]  J. Brian Gray,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2002, Technometrics.

[29]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time. , 1996 .

[30]  L. Robbins,et al.  Recent range expansion and distributional limits of the nine‐banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) in the United States , 1996 .

[31]  R. Sokal,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 1. Methodology , 1978 .

[32]  E. Birney,et al.  Handbook of Mammals of the North-Central States , 1988 .

[33]  R. Stucky Evolution of land mammal diversity in North America during the Cenozoic , 1990 .

[34]  S. Legendre Les communautés de mammifères du paléogène (éocène supérieur et oligocène) d'Europe occidentale : structures, milieux et évolution , 1988 .

[35]  R. Blackwelder Species Density of North American Recent Mammals , 1964 .