Why do they become potential cyber-plagiarizers? Exploring the alternative thinking of copy-and-paste youth in Taiwan

With the expansion of digital content, academic integrity has been facing the growing threat of cyber-plagiarism. In the present research, we address young Taiwanese students' perceptions of cyber-plagiarism. Our research included two related studies: in study 1, we collected data through a national survey on a probability sample of 41,911 (4th-12th graders) and analyzed the prevalence and alternative thinking about cyber plagiarism among these students; in study 2, we collected 113 young students' anonymous questionnaires inquiring into the reasoning that the students applied to their own use of online resources for homework. The results of our research show that the prevalence of frequent copy-and-paste students was less than 3% of the surveyed 4th-12th graders in Taiwan. Moreover, we have found that copy-and-paste practices were more prevalent among the 10th and 12th graders than among students in the other grades, and that more male students than female students engaged in copy-and-paste behavior. We have also found that these students' concept and their ways of using Internet information properly seem incorrect. We suggest that educators implement copy-and-paste prevention curriculum throughout elementary, junior high, and high schools. We offer teaching advice for the prevention of cyber plagiarism, encouraging educators to teach students appropriate ways to resolve copy-and-paste problems. The prevalence of frequent copy-and-paste(c&p) students was less than 3% in Taiwan.C&p were more prevalent among the 10th and 12th graders, and male students.Frequent c&p students were engage in alternative-thinking.The alternative-thinking are "Copying online materials is a type of learning" and so on.

[1]  Julianne East,et al.  Judging plagiarism: a problem of morality and convention , 2010 .

[2]  Sandra Turner,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Digital Cheating and Plagiarism Among Middle School Students , 2007 .

[3]  Paul Stapleton,et al.  Writing in an electronic age: A case study of L2 composing processes , 2010 .

[4]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Promoting reading comprehension with the use of technology , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[5]  D. Sisti,et al.  How Do High School Students Justify Internet Plagiarism? , 2007 .

[6]  Sue Clegg,et al.  More heat than light: plagiarism in its appearing , 2006 .

[7]  Daniel Owunwanne,et al.  Students Perceptions Of Cheating And Plagiarism In Higher Institutions , 2010 .

[8]  Shifra Baruchson-Arbib,et al.  Printed Versus Internet Plagiarism: A Study of Students' Perception , 2004 .

[9]  A. Lathrop,et al.  Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era: A Wake-Up Call , 2000 .

[10]  Chien Chou,et al.  College students' misunderstandings about copyright laws for digital library resources , 2010, Electron. Libr..

[11]  Greg Wheeler,et al.  Plagiarism in the Japanese universities: Truly a cultural matter? , 2009 .

[12]  Guofang Wan,et al.  Digital Cheating and Plagiarism in Schools , 2008 .

[13]  Diane Pecorari,et al.  Plagiarism in second-language writing , 2014, Language Teaching.

[14]  Yu-Chih Sun,et al.  Using a two-tier test in examining Taiwan graduate students’ perspectives on paraphrasing strategies , 2009 .

[15]  Angela L. Walker.  Preventing unintentional plagiarism: a method for strengthening paraphrasing skills , 2008 .

[16]  Charles Sturt,et al.  Staff and Student Perceptions of Plagiarism and Cheating , 2009 .

[17]  John Walker,et al.  Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do , 2010 .

[18]  Nicholas Ferriman.  The impact of blended e-learning on undergraduate academic essay writing in English (L2) , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[19]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[20]  T. Kwong,et al.  Students' and faculty's perception of academic integrity in Hong Kong , 2010 .

[21]  Murat Pasa Uysal.  Interviews With College Students: Evaluating Computer Programming Environments For Introductory Courses , 2014 .

[22]  Yongyan Li,et al.  Two first-year students’ strategies for writing from sources: Patchwriting or plagiarism? , 2012 .

[23]  Eric M. Beasley.  Students Reported for Cheating Explain What They Think Would Have Stopped Them , 2014 .

[24]  Jean Liddell,et al.  A Comprehensive Definition of Plagiarism , 2003 .

[25]  John Flowerdew,et al.  PLAGIARISM AND SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING IN AN ELECTRONIC AGE , 2007, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[26]  L. Gourlay,et al.  Loss, responsibility, blame? Staff discourses of student plagiarism , 2012 .

[27]  G. Tyson,et al.  Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group study , 2010 .

[28]  Javier Gil-Flores,et al.  The role of online reader experience in explaining students' performance in digital reading , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Jun Lei,et al.  Investigating Chinese University Students' Knowledge of and Attitudes toward Plagiarism from an Integrated Perspective. , 2012 .

[30]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[31]  Yongyan Li,et al.  “I have no time to find out where the sentences came from; I just rebuild them”: A biochemistry professor eliminating novices’ textual borrowing , 2012 .

[32]  Wilfred W. F. Lau,et al.  Internet ethics of adolescents: Understanding demographic differences , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Scott I. Simon,et al.  Five Simple Rules to Avoid Plagiarism , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[35]  Barbara Graves,et al.  Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors , 2008 .