Resolving Fine-Scale Surface Features on Polar Sea Ice: A First Assessment of UAS Photogrammetry Without Ground Control

Mapping landfast sea ice at a fine spatial scale is not only meaningful for geophysical study, but is also of benefit for providing information about human activities upon it. The combination of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) with structure from motion (SfM) methods have already revolutionized the current close-range Earth observation paradigm. To test their feasibility in characterizing the properties and dynamics of fast ice, three flights were carried out in the 2016–2017 austral summer during the 33rd Chinese National Antarctic Expedition (CHINARE), focusing on the area of the Prydz Bay in East Antarctica. Three-dimensional models and orthomosaics from three sorties were constructed from a total of 205 photos using Agisoft PhotoScan software. Logistical challenges presented by the terrain precluded the deployment of a dedicated ground control network; however, it was still possible to indirectly assess the performance of the photogrammetric products through an analysis of the statistics of the matching network, bundle adjustment, and Monte-Carlo simulation. Our results show that the matching networks are quite strong, given a sufficient number of feature points (mostly > 20,000) or valid matches (mostly > 1000). The largest contribution to the total error using our direct georeferencing approach is attributed to inaccuracies in the onboard position and orientation system (POS) records, especially in the vehicle height and yaw angle. On one hand, the 3D precision map reveals that planimetric precision is usually about one-third of the vertical estimate (typically 20 cm in the network centre). On the other hand, shape-only errors account for less than 5% for the X and Y dimensions and 20% for the Z dimension. To further illustrate the UAS’s capability, six representative surface features are selected and interpreted by sea ice experts. Finally, we offer pragmatic suggestions and guidelines for planning future UAS-SfM surveys without the use of ground control. The work represents a pioneering attempt to comprehensively assess UAS-SfM survey capability in fast ice environments, and could serve as a reference for future improvements.

[1]  Ben Grayson,et al.  GPS precise point positioning for UAV photogrammetry , 2018 .

[2]  Yan Liu,et al.  Semi-Automatic Mapping of Tidal Cracks in the Fast Ice Region near Zhongshan Station in East Antarctica Using Landsat-8 OLI Imagery , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Tomasz Goetzendorf-Grabowski,et al.  Design of UAV for photogrammetric mission in Antarctic area , 2017 .

[4]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[5]  Lin Zhang,et al.  Satellite-Based Sea Ice Navigation for Prydz Bay, East Antarctica , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[6]  M. Dąbski,et al.  Application of UAV BVLOS remote sensing data for multi-faceted analysis of Antarctic ecosystem , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[7]  Stephen F. Ackley,et al.  Object-based detection of Arctic sea ice and melt ponds using high spatial resolution aerial photographs , 2015 .

[8]  Jan Skaloud,et al.  Bundle adjustment with raw inertial observations in UAV applications , 2017 .

[9]  Xiao Cheng,et al.  Xuelong Navigation in Fast Ice Near the Zhongshan Station, Antarctica , 2014 .

[10]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera , 2012, Sensors.

[11]  Patrice E. Carbonneau,et al.  Cost‐effective non‐metric photogrammetry from consumer‐grade sUAS: implications for direct georeferencing of structure from motion photogrammetry , 2017 .

[12]  Walter B. Tucker,et al.  Aerial observations of the evolution of ice surface conditions during summer , 2002 .

[13]  Petra Heil,et al.  Semi-automated feature-tracking of East Antarctic sea ice from Envisat ASAR imagery , 2011 .

[14]  M. Funaki,et al.  Outline of a small unmanned aerial vehicle (Ant-Plane) designed for Antarctic research , 2008 .

[15]  Franz J. Meyer,et al.  Evaluating landfast sea ice stress and fracture in support of operations on sea ice using SAR interferometry , 2018 .

[16]  A. Stoffel,et al.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of homogenous snow surfaces in alpine terrain applying near-infrared UAS imagery , 2017 .

[17]  Franz J. Meyer,et al.  Traversing Sea Ice—Linking Surface Roughness and Ice Trafficability Through SAR Polarimetry and Interferometry , 2018, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Chris Polashenski,et al.  Open-source algorithm for detecting sea ice surface features in high-resolution optical imagery , 2017 .

[19]  Dustin Isleifson,et al.  Parameterization of Centimeter-Scale Sea Ice Surface Roughness Using Terrestrial LiDAR , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Pedro Elosegui,et al.  Small-scale deformation of an Arctic sea ice floe detected by GPS and satellite imagery , 2015 .

[21]  Christophe Delacourt,et al.  Suggestions to Limit Geometric Distortions in the Reconstruction of Linear Coastal Landforms by SfM Photogrammetry with PhotoScan® and MicMac® for UAV Surveys with Restricted GCPs Pattern , 2018, Drones.

[22]  M. Silber,et al.  Simple Rules Govern the Patterns of Arctic Sea Ice Melt Ponds. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[23]  M. Gupta.  Various remote sensing approaches to understanding roughness in the marginal ice zone , 2015 .

[24]  Paul McGill,et al.  Aerial surveys and tagging of free-drifting icebergs using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) , 2011 .

[25]  Guy Williams,et al.  Application of Low-Cost UASs and Digital Photogrammetry for High-Resolution Snow Depth Mapping in the Arctic , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Laurence C. Smith,et al.  Derivation of High Spatial Resolution Albedo from UAV Digital Imagery: Application over the Greenland Ice Sheet , 2017, Front. Earth Sci..

[27]  C. Barbraud,et al.  Fast ice distribution in Adélie Land, East Antarctica: interannual variability and implications for emperor penguins Aptenodytes forsteri , 2009 .

[28]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[29]  K. Sanderson.  Unmanned craft chart the Antarctic winter , 2008 .

[30]  F. Meyer,et al.  Landfast sea ice stability – mapping pan-Arctic ice regimes with implications for ice use, subsea permafrost and marine habitats , 2018 .

[31]  W. Xiaoyu,et al.  Determination of Arctic melt pond fraction and sea ice roughness from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery , 2018 .

[32]  R. Kwok,et al.  Sea-ice deformation in a coupled ocean–sea-ice model and in satellite remote sensing data , 2016 .

[33]  Franz J. Meyer,et al.  Assessing Sea Ice Trafficability in a Changing Arctic , 2018 .

[34]  Bin Cheng,et al.  Annual cycle of landfast sea ice in Prydz Bay, east Antarctica , 2010 .

[35]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  Applying ASPRS Accuracy Standards to Surveys from Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) , 2015 .

[36]  S. M. Jong,et al.  High-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2014 .

[37]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Produced via Multi-View Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[38]  S. Robson,et al.  Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application , 2012 .

[39]  Bin Cheng,et al.  Sea ice surface features in Arctic summer 2008: Aerial observations , 2010 .

[40]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[41]  P. Heil,et al.  Seasonal and interannual variations of the oceanic heat flux under a landfast Antarctic sea ice cover , 1996 .

[42]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[43]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[44]  R. Massom,et al.  Fast-ice distribution in East Antarctica during 1997 and 1999 determined using RADARSAT data , 2008 .

[45]  John Woodward,et al.  Sedimentological characterization of Antarctic moraines using UAVs and Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[46]  Franz J. Meyer,et al.  Assessing small-scale deformation and stability of landfast sea ice on seasonal timescales through L-band SAR interferometry and inverse modeling , 2016 .

[47]  David G. Barber,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Terrestrial LiDAR for Parameterizing Centimeter-Scale Sea Ice Surface Roughness , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[48]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[49]  S. Gerland,et al.  An Antarctic monitoring initiative for fast ice and comparison with the Arctic , 2011 .

[50]  Anne W. Nolin,et al.  Arctic Sea Ice Surface Roughness Estimated from Multi-Angular Reflectance Satellite Imagery , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[51]  Hajo Eicken,et al.  Toward an integrated coastal sea-ice observatory: System components and a case study at Barrow, Alaska , 2009 .

[52]  Stephen F. Ackley,et al.  Object-Based Arctic Sea Ice Ridge Detection From High-Spatial-Resolution Imagery , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[53]  Jaan Praks,et al.  A Study of Landfast Ice with Sentinel-1 Repeat-Pass Interferometry over the Baltic Sea , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[54]  A. Fraser,et al.  Generation of high-resolution East Antarctic landfast sea-ice maps from cloud-free MODIS satellite composite imagery , 2010 .

[55]  David Leary,et al.  Drones on ice: an assessment of the legal implications of the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in scientific research and by the tourist industry in Antarctica , 2017, Polar Record.

[56]  Gonzalo Pajares,et al.  Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) , 2015 .

[57]  Anshuman Bhardwaj,et al.  UAVs as remote sensing platform in glaciology: Present applications and future prospects , 2016 .

[58]  S. Robson,et al.  3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys , 2017 .

[59]  Konrad Schindler,et al.  Mathematical Foundations of Photogrammetry , 2014 .

[60]  C. Haas,et al.  Combined Airborne Profiling over Fram Strait Sea Ice: Fractional Sea-Ice Types, Albedo and Thickness Measurements , 2009 .

[61]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Testing Accuracy and Repeatability of UAV Blocks Oriented with GNSS-Supported Aerial Triangulation , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[62]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .