Predicting User Engagement with Direct Displays Using Mouse Cursor Information

Predicting user engagement with direct displays (DD) is of paramount importance to commercial search engines, as well as to search performance evaluation. However, understanding within-content engagement on a web page is not a trivial task mainly because of two reasons: (1) engagement is subjective and different users may exhibit different behavioural patterns; (2) existing proxies of user engagement (e.g., clicks, dwell time) suffer from certain caveats, such as the well-known position bias, and are not as effective in discriminating between useful and non-useful components. In this paper, we conduct a crowdsourcing study and examine how users engage with a prominent web search engine component such as the knowledge module (KM) display. To this end, we collect and analyse more than 115k mouse cursor positions from 300 users, who perform a series of search tasks. Furthermore, we engineer a large number of meta-features which we use to predict different proxies of user engagement, including attention and usefulness. In our experiments, we demonstrate that our approach is able to predict more accurately different levels of user engagement and outperform existing baselines.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Discovering common motifs in cursor movement data for improving web search , 2014, WSDM.

[3]  B. Pompe,et al.  Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[4]  Wei Chu,et al.  Learning to Recommend Related Entities to Search Users , 2015, WSDM.

[5]  Roi Blanco,et al.  Entity Recommendations in Web Search , 2013, SEMWEB.

[6]  Ryen W. White,et al.  No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search , 2011, CHI.

[7]  George Valkanas,et al.  Understanding Within-Content Engagement through Pattern Analysis of Mouse Gestures , 2014, CIKM.

[8]  Ernesto Arroyo,et al.  CarCoach: a polite and effective driving coach , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[9]  Luis A. Leiva,et al.  Building a better mousetrap: Compressing mouse cursor activity for web analytics , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Ready to buy or just browsing?: detecting web searcher goals from interaction data , 2010, SIGIR.

[11]  Luis A. Leiva,et al.  Web browsing behavior analysis and interactive hypervideo , 2013, TWEB.

[12]  Praveen Paritosh,et al.  Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge , 2008, SIGMOD Conference.

[13]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Mouse tracking: measuring and predicting users' experience of web-based content , 2012, CHI.

[14]  Badong Chen,et al.  Weighted-permutation entropy: a complexity measure for time series incorporating amplitude information. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Beyond dwell time: estimating document relevance from cursor movements and other post-click searcher behavior , 2012, WWW.

[16]  Gerhard Weikum,et al.  YAGO2: A Spatially and Temporally Enhanced Knowledge Base from Wikipedia: Extended Abstract , 2013, IJCAI.

[17]  Dmitry Lagun,et al.  Improving Relevance Prediction by Addressing Biases and Sparsity in Web Search Click Data , 2012 .

[18]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[19]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Improving searcher models using mouse cursor activity , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[22]  Roi Blanco,et al.  From "Selena Gomez" to "Marlon Brando": Understanding Explorative Entity Search , 2015, WWW.

[23]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Leaving so soon?: understanding and predicting web search abandonment rationales , 2012, CIKM.

[24]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[25]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  User engagement in online News: Under the scope of sentiment, interest, affect, and gaze , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  James Allan,et al.  Predicting searcher frustration , 2010, SIGIR.

[27]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Different Users, Different Opinions: Predicting Search Satisfaction with Mouse Movement Information , 2015, SIGIR.

[28]  Bracha Shapira,et al.  Study of the usefulness of known and new implicit indicators and their optimal combination for accurate inference of users interests , 2006, SAC.

[29]  Berkant Barla Cambazoglu,et al.  Know Your Onions: Understanding the User Experience with the Knowledge Module in Web Search , 2015, CIKM.

[30]  Luis A. Leiva,et al.  Assessing users' interactions for clustering web documents: a pragmatic approach , 2010, HT '10.

[31]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Exploring mouse movements for inferring query intent , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[32]  Jude W. Shavlik,et al.  Learning users' interests by unobtrusively observing their normal behavior , 2000, IUI '00.

[33]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  An Exploration of Cursor tracking Data , 2015, ArXiv.

[34]  Gerhard Weikum,et al.  WWW 2007 / Track: Semantic Web Session: Ontologies ABSTRACT YAGO: A Core of Semantic Knowledge , 2022 .

[35]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Knowing the User's Every Move – User Activity Tracking for Website Usability Evaluation and Implicit Interaction , 2006 .

[36]  Seetha Hari,et al.  Learning From Imbalanced Data , 2019, Advances in Computer and Electrical Engineering.

[37]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[38]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Predicting web search success with fine-grained interaction data , 2012, CIKM.

[39]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion , 2014, KDD.

[40]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Luis A. Leiva Restyling website design via touch-based interactions , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[42]  Martin Gaedke,et al.  TellMyRelevance!: predicting the relevance of web search results from cursor interactions , 2013, CIKM.