Interpretability evaluation of annual mosaic image of MTB model for land cover changes analysis

To verify whether the annual mosaic image of MTB model is acceptable for further digital analysis, it is necessary to evaluate the visual interpretability. The MTB model is an effort to integrate multi-scene and multi-temporal data, to obtain a minimum cloud cover mosaic image in locations that are often covered by clouds and haze. This study is to evaluate the interpretability of the annual mosaic image for analysis of the land cover changes. The data used are the images of 2015, 2016, and 2017 covers a part of central Sumatra. Visual interpretations with a series of steps are used, starting with identification of the objects using interpretation keys, followed by spectral band correlations, scattergram analysis, and ended by consistency assessment. The consistency assessment step is performed to determine the level of clearness and easiness of the object recognition in the annual mosaic images. The results showed that the most optimal spectral bands used for RGB combinations for visual interpretation were Band SWIR-1, Band NIR, and Band Red. Based on the evaluation results, the annual mosaic image of MTB model performed the consistent results of the clearness objects and the easiness of the object recognition. Thus the annual mosaic image of MTB model of 0.02x0.02 degree tile is acceptable for further digital processing as well as digital land cover analysis.

[1]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[2]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation: Time-Series Analysis of Multi-Resolution Optical Imagery for Quantifying Forest Cover Loss in Sumatra and Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2011 .

[3]  Arief Wijaya,et al.  Assessment of Large Scale Land Cover Change Classifications and Drivers of Deforestation in Indonesia , 2015 .

[4]  Suparn Pathak New Change Detection Techniques to monitor land cover dynamics in mine environment , 2014 .

[5]  Budiharto,et al.  Indonesia’s Forest Resource Monitoring , 2016 .

[6]  Belinda A. Margono,et al.  Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012 , 2014 .

[7]  Kustiyo DEVELOPMENT OF ANNUAL LANDSAT 8 COMPOSITE OVER CENTRAL KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA USING AUTOMATIC ALGORITHM TO MINIMIZE CLOUD , 2017 .

[8]  Jeremy F. Wallace,et al.  Annual Forest Monitoring as part of Indonesia's National Carbon Accounting System , 2015 .

[9]  Projo Danoedoro,et al.  A Minimum Cloud Cover Mosaic Image Model of the Operational Land Imager Landsat-8 Multitemporal Data using Tile based , 2018 .

[10]  Mihai Datcu,et al.  Interactive Spectral Band Discovery for Exploratory Visual Analysis of Satellite Images , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[11]  D. Roy,et al.  A method for integrating MODIS and Landsat data for systematic monitoring of forest cover and change in the Congo Basin , 2008 .

[12]  Dongmei Chen,et al.  Change detection from remotely sensed images: From pixel-based to object-based approaches , 2013 .

[13]  Steven E. Franklin,et al.  Multi-scale object-based image analysis and feature selection of multi-sensor earth observation imagery using random forests , 2012 .

[14]  Hankui K. Zhang,et al.  A general method to normalize Landsat reflectance data to nadir BRDF adjusted reflectance , 2016 .

[15]  J. P. Gastellu Etcregorry monthly probabilities for acquiring remote sensed data of indonesia with cloud cover less than 10 , 20 and 30 percent , 1988 .

[16]  F. Achard,et al.  Tropical forest cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Bin Chen,et al.  Spatially and Temporally Weighted Regression: A Novel Method to Produce Continuous Cloud-Free Landsat Imagery , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  D. Lu,et al.  Change detection techniques , 2004 .