Differential effects of parental involvement on cognitive and behavioral outcomes by socioeconomic status

Abstract Parental involvement is a much investigated area of research. Unfortunately, there are many conflicting findings. In some cases, researchers claim parental involvement positively affects academic achievement, while others claim parental involvement negatively affects academic achievement. Finally, a third grouping of studies find parental involvement has no significant relationship to academic achievement. A parallel body of research investigating the forces affecting dropping out has also been developed. Unfortunately, little research has actually attempted to link the various dimensions of parental involvement to dropping out or other at-risk behavioral outcomes, such as truancy (one exception being Astone and McLanahan 1991). Using the concepts of cultural and social capital, I provide a theoretical framework for why there would exist differential effects of parental involvement across cognitive (e.g., science achievement) and behavioral (e.g., truancy and dropping out) outcomes. I further investigate the variable relationships between involvement and each outcome by socioeconomic status. Findings indicate that parental involvement is generally a salient factor in explaining behavioral but not cognitive outcomes, with greatest support for parent-child discussion and involvement in Parent-Teacher organizations. Findings also indicate that specific dimensions of involvement have greater effects for upper SES students. These findings can be considered preliminary support for the contention of Bourdieu (1977) and Lareau (1989) that the greater levels of cultural capital possessed by the members of the upper class magnifies parental involvement’s effect for advantaged students.

[1]  C. McGuire,et al.  Office of Educational Research and Improvement , 1999 .

[2]  Annette Lareau,et al.  Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education. , 1991 .

[3]  R. Mare,et al.  Secondary School Tracking and Educational Inequality: Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality? , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  J. Epstein,et al.  School and Family Partnerships. , 1992 .

[5]  N. Astone,et al.  Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. , 1991 .

[6]  J. Willms,et al.  Effects of Parental Involvement on Eighth-Grade Achievement. , 1996 .

[7]  Adam Gamoran,et al.  The Stratification of High School Learning Opportunities. , 1987 .

[8]  J. Epstein Homework Practices, Achievements, and Behaviors of Elementary School Students. Report No. 26. , 1988 .

[9]  T. Good,et al.  Student Passivity: A Study of Question Asking in K-12 Classrooms. , 1987 .

[10]  T. Keith Parent involvement and achievement in high school. , 1991 .

[11]  Alan L. Ginsburg,et al.  Single Parents, Working Mothers, and the Educational Achievement of School Children. , 1986 .

[12]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Parent Involvement: A Survey of Teacher Practices , 1982, The Elementary School Journal.

[13]  R. J. Griffore,et al.  Limits and Possibilities of Family and School as Educators , 1986 .

[14]  James S. Coleman,et al.  Families and Schools , 1987 .

[15]  M. Garet,et al.  Students, Courses, and Stratification. , 1988 .

[16]  Bonnie Steinbock,et al.  Commentaries on the issue: A policy perspective , 1995 .

[17]  J. Epstein Effects on student achievement of teachers' practices of parent involvement. , 1991 .

[18]  Annette Lareau SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN FAMILY-SCHOOL RELATIONSHIPS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CULTURAL CAPITAL , 1987 .

[19]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.