Set-Up Analysis and Optimization of CFD Simulations for Radial Turbines

Abstract This paper proposes a CFD method for simulating radial turbocharger turbine flows. A review is presented of the computational model in terms of meshing, mesh movement strategy, and computational algorithm in turbomachinery CFD simulations. A novel local mesh independence analysis is developed for this purpose. This procedure is aimed at distributing the cells more efficiently by selecting suitable cell sizes for the different regions of the domain to optimize the use of the available computational resources. Pressure- and density-based solvers are compared. The influence of the moving-mesh strategy was analyzed, and small differences were observed in the region near the maximum efficiency point, while these differences increased when off-design conditions were considered. Finally, a comparison of the results with data from an experimental test bench shows that the proposed computational methodology can be used to characterize radial turbomachinery. The objective of the analysis and the optimization of the case configuration was to establish some general guidelines for CFD turbomachinery simulations.

[1]  D. Wilcox Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , 1988 .

[2]  J. Luján,et al.  Test Bench for Turbocharger Groups Characterization , 2002 .

[3]  Antonio J. Torregrosa,et al.  Development of Non-Reflecting Boundary Condition for Application in 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes , 2012 .

[4]  A. M. Tousi,et al.  Comparison of turbulence methods in CFD analysis of compressible flows in radial turbomachines , 2008 .

[5]  Nicholas C. Baines Fundamentals of Turbocharging , 2005 .

[6]  Jeroen A. S. Witteveen,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for laminar-turbulent transition prediction in RANS turbomachinery applications , 2011 .

[7]  Carlos Guardiola,et al.  Surge limit definition in a specific test bench for the characterization of automotive turbochargers , 2006 .

[8]  E. G. Sheikin,et al.  39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit , 2001 .

[9]  Geoffrey McCullough,et al.  A direct performance comparison of vaned and vaneless stators for radial turbines , 2007 .

[10]  F. R. Menter,et al.  Influence of freestream values on k-omega turbulence model predictions , 1992 .

[11]  S. Wittig,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Study of Unsteady Flow Field and Vibration in Radial Inflow Turbines , 1999 .

[12]  Peter Prenninger,et al.  Charging the Internal Combustion Engine , 2007 .

[13]  Hongmin Li Fluid Flow Analysis of a Single-Stage Centrifugal Fan with a Ported Diffuser , 2009 .

[14]  Thomas Scanlon,et al.  NUMERICAL FLOW SIMULATION IN A CENTRIFUGAL PUMP WITH IMPELLER - VOLUTE INTERACTION , 2000 .

[15]  Srithar Rajoo,et al.  Variable Geometry Mixed Flow Turbine for Turbochargers: An Experimental Study , 2008 .

[16]  Fred Mendonça,et al.  Automotive Turbocharger Compressor CFD and Extension Towards Incorporating Installation Effects , 2011 .

[17]  Luis Miguel García-Cuevas,et al.  Characterization of a radial turbocharger turbine in pulsating flow by means of CFD and its application to engine modeling , 2013 .

[18]  Hideaki Tamaki,et al.  Comparison of Internal Flow Field between Experiment and Computation in a Radial Turbine Impeller , 2004 .

[19]  Fredrik Hellström,et al.  Numerical computations of the unsteady flow in turbochargers , 2010 .

[20]  M. Strelets Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows , 2001 .

[21]  David Japikse,et al.  Introduction to Turbomachinery , 1994 .

[22]  Alister Simpson,et al.  A Comparison of the Flow Structures and Losses Within Vaned and Vaneless Stators for Radial Turbines , 2009 .

[23]  J. Smagorinsky,et al.  GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS , 1963 .

[24]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[25]  Ricardo Martinez-Botas,et al.  The Pulsating Flow Field in a Mixed Flow Turbocharger Turbine: An Experimental and Computational Study , 2005 .

[26]  Edward S. Taylor,et al.  The internal combustion engine , 1961 .

[27]  F. Maroteaux,et al.  Simulation of the Performance of a Variable Geometry Turbocharger for Diesel Engine Road Propulsion , 2002 .

[28]  Yue Zhao,et al.  Assessment of Les Performance in Simulating Complex 3D Flows in Turbo-Machines , 2012 .

[29]  Z. Liu,et al.  Issues Surrounding Multiple Frames of Reference Models for Turbo Compressor Applications , 2000 .

[30]  A. Thakker,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics analysis of a 0.6m, 0.6 hub-to-tip ratio impulse turbine with fixed guide vanes , 2005 .

[31]  Thomas Esch,et al.  Heat transfer predictions based on two-equation turbulence models with advanced wall treatment , 2003 .

[32]  Gavin Tabor,et al.  Inlet conditions for large eddy simulation: A review , 2010 .

[33]  Tomoki Kawakubo,et al.  Unsteady Rotor-Stator Interaction of a Radial-Inflow Turbine With Variable Nozzle Vanes , 2010 .

[34]  Laszlo Fuchs,et al.  Numerical Computation of the Pulsatile Flow in a Turbocharger With Realistic Inflow Conditions From an Exhaust Manifold , 2009 .

[35]  Michael Tritthart,et al.  Three-Dimensional Simulation of Free-Surface Flows Using Polyhedral Finite Volumes , 2007 .

[36]  José Galindo,et al.  Coupling methodology of 1D finite difference and 3D finite volume CFD codes based on the Method of Characteristics , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[37]  Laszlo Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Inlet Conditions on the Turbine Performance of a Radial Turbine , 2008 .

[38]  Koen Hillewaert,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Impeller–Volute Interaction in Centrifugal Compressors , 1998 .