A pilot study to evaluate the use of virtual lectures for undergraduate radiology teaching.

PURPOSE To demonstrate that virtual lectures can substitute conventional lectures in radiology education for medical students. METHODS AND MATERIALS During the course 2005-2006, 89 out from 191 (46.6%) third year students of a subject entitled "General Radiology", participated voluntarily in a pilot study including 22 virtual lectures (Flash presentations translated from the same PowerPoint presentations of conventional lectures, adding recorded narration and navigation tools). Participants (P) studied by means of virtual lectures, while non-participants (NP) assisted to conventional lectures. The results of the final oral exam classified from 0 to 3, and a 60-questions evaluation on image interpretation were used to compare both groups after training. Finally, 34 students from the group P (38.2%) fulfilled a 10-points scale quality survey about the project. RESULTS Final exam qualifications were significantly higher for P than for NP (2.11 ± 0.85 versus 1.73 ± 1.04) as well as the number of correct answers of the evaluation on image interpretation (24.2 ± 6.2 versus 21.2 ± 5.4), but differences could obey to different attitudes between both groups. The usefulness of virtual lectures to learn General Radiology obtained the highest global scoring (8.82 ± 1.00). Contents were generally better evaluated than the design of the presentations. CONCLUSION Virtual lectures can substitute conventional lectures in radiology education for medical students with no detriment to students' learning. Their potential advantage is that magisterial lectures can be used to discuss contents with students in a more participative way if virtual lectures are provided before.

[1]  R. Armstrong.  Interactive computer programs. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[2]  J. Blickman,et al.  The virtual course: delivery of live and recorded continuing medical education material over the Internet. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Gerard S Letterie,et al.  Medical education as a science: the quality of evidence for computer-assisted instruction. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  P J Lynch,et al.  Computer-aided instruction for radiologic education. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  J. Collins.  Education techniques for lifelong learning: making a PowerPoint presentation. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  Roberto Lagalla,et al.  Initial experiences in radiology e-learning. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  M. Valcke,et al.  The perceived long-term impact of the radiological curriculum innovation in the medical doctors training at Ghent University. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[8]  T. Vincent,et al.  Blending online techniques with traditional face to face teaching methods to deliver final year undergraduate radiology learning content. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[9]  Adam E Flanders,et al.  What is the future of electronic learning in radiology? , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  B S Kuszyk,et al.  An interactive computer-based tool for teaching the segmental anatomy of the liver: usefulness in the education of residents and fellows. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Ronald E. Fraley,et al.  Instructional technology and radiologic education. , 2001, Radiology.

[12]  C. Björkelund,et al.  Impact of medical students' descriptive evaluations on long-term course development , 2006, BMC medical education.

[13]  Peter A. Cohen,et al.  Computer-Based Instruction and Health Professions Education , 1992 .

[14]  F. Sendra-Portero,et al.  Medical students' skills in image interpretation before and after training: a comparison between 3rd-year and 6th-year students from two different medical curricula. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[15]  E P Tamm,et al.  The virtual lecture: delivery of live and recorded presentations over the Internet. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  R. Leipzig,et al.  The impact of E-learning in medical education. , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[17]  G R Norman,et al.  The inadequacy of recent research on computer‐assisted instruction , 1991, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  F. S. Portero,et al.  Herramientas de formación on-line en radiología , 2011 .

[19]  C P Friedman,et al.  The research we should be doing , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  An analysis of the use of virtual delivery of undergraduate lectures , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[21]  F. Sendra Portero,et al.  [Online training tools in radiology]. , 2011, Radiologia.

[22]  R. Dussault,et al.  The radiographic signs of arthritis: a computer teaching module. , 1995, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.