Determination and evaluation of the operation characteristics for two configurations of combined heat and power systems depending on the heating plant parameters in low-temperature geothermal applications

This paper analyzes impact of the required heating plant parameters on the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) power plant and the total plant behavior for two connections of CHP systems; they are the parallel plant and CHP integration according to Glewe-plant, Germany. And also, degree of utilizing the geothermal heat source will be discussed, and all CHP systems presented in the literature will be compared under the same conditions. R134a as working fluid in power plant will be employed. Exergy efficiency, net output power of ORC, irreversibility especially with exhausted geothermal water and the total heat exchange areas will be evaluated. From the calculations, it could be concluded that when operating the power plant in the both aforementioned CHP connections, its performances will be destructed at high heating plant parameters. So the compromised values of the low return temperatures and the heat exchange areas will enhance the power production and the performance of the total CHP systems at unchanged heat demand and supply temperature. The supply temperature does not have any effects on the power generation in case of the parallel connection, while the high values of this temperature affect negatively the other integration. The analysis also proved that the increasing heat demand will reduce the ORC productivity, but it will enhance the heat source utilization. The comparison between the CHP plants showed that the parallel connection is more economical and the series connection is energetically more efficient, while the integration according to Glewe-plant does not provide significant optimization. Finally, it could be noticed that the maximal optimized mechanical power in all present CHP configurations is so restricted, where it does not surpass 50% of the maximal power produced by stand-alone ORC plant.

[1]  P. J. Lienau,et al.  Geo-heat center , 1983 .

[2]  Kyoung Hoon Kim,et al.  A Thermodynamic Analysis of Cogeneration System in Parallel Circuit Based on Organic Rankine Cycle , 2012 .

[3]  Marco Badami,et al.  Exergetic analysis of an innovative small scale combined cycle cogeneration system , 2010 .

[4]  D. Brüggemann,et al.  Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle for combined heat and power generation , 2010 .

[5]  Jialing Zhu,et al.  Comparative analysis of series and parallel geothermal systems combined power, heat and oil recovery in oilfield , 2013 .

[6]  Kyoung Hoon Kim,et al.  Analysis of Cogeneration System in Series Circuit Based on Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle , 2012 .

[7]  S. Köhler Analysis of the Combined Heat and Power Plant Neustadt-Glewe , 2005 .

[8]  N. Lai,et al.  Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles , 2007 .

[9]  Peter von Böckh,et al.  Wrmebertragung: Grundlagen und Praxis , 2009 .

[10]  Silke Köhler Geothermisch angetriebene Dampfkraftprozesse : Analyse und Prozessvergleich binärer Kraftwerke , 2005 .

[11]  B. Younglove,et al.  Thermophysical properties of fluids , 1982 .

[12]  Mingtian Xu,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of waste heat power generation system , 2010 .

[13]  Mikhail Sorin,et al.  Comparison of combined heat and power systems using an organic Rankine cycle and a low-temperature heat source , 2013 .

[14]  Markus Preißinger,et al.  Thermoeconomic Evaluation of Combined Heat and Power Generation for Geothermal Applications , 2011 .

[15]  Tzu-Chen Hung,et al.  A study of organic working fluids on system efficiency of an ORC using low-grade energy sources , 2010 .

[16]  Tao Guo,et al.  Fluids and parameters optimization for a novel cogeneration system driven by low-temperature geother , 2011 .

[17]  Daniele Fiaschi,et al.  Thermo-economic assessment of a micro CHP system fuelled by geothermal and solar energy , 2013 .

[18]  H. D. Baehr,et al.  Thermodynamik : Grundlagen und technische Anwendungen , 1986 .