Mirror, mirror on the wall: an international update on the comparative performance of American health care

Despite having the most costly health system in the world, the United States consistently underperforms on most dimensions of performance, relative to other countries. Compared with five other nations - Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, the United Kingdom - the U.S. health care system ranks last or next-to-last on five dimensions of a high performance health system: quality, access, efficiency, equity, and healthy lives. The U.S. is the only country in the study without universal health insurance coverage, partly accounting for its poor performance on access, equity, and health outcomes. The inclusion of physician survey data also shows the U.S. lagging in adoption of information technology and use of nurses to improve care coordination for the chronically ill.

[1]  K. Davis.  Uninsured in America: problems and possible solutions , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Karen Davis,et al.  Learning from High Performance Health Systems Around the Globe , 2007 .

[3]  C. Schoen,et al.  On the front lines of care: primary care doctors' office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. , 2006, Health affairs.

[4]  Karen Davis,et al.  U.S. health system performance: a national scorecard. , 2006, Health affairs.

[5]  N. Halfon,et al.  Rethinking Well-Child Care in the United States: An International Comparison , 2006, Pediatrics.

[6]  D. McInnes,et al.  General practitioners’ use of computers for prescribing and electronic health records: results from a national survey , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  U. Reinhardt,et al.  Health care spending and use of information technology in OECD countries. , 2006, Health affairs.

[8]  The U.S. Health Care Divide: Disparities in Primary Care Experiences by Income , 2006 .

[9]  K. Davis,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: An Update on the Quality of American Health Care Through the Patient's Lens , 2006 .

[10]  C. Mitton,et al.  Centralized drug review processes in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United kingdom. , 2006, Health affairs.

[11]  Karen Davis,et al.  Taking the pulse of health care systems: experiences of patients with health problems in six countries. , 2005, Health affairs.

[12]  K. Davis,et al.  Primary care and health system performance: adults' experiences in five countries. , 2004, Health affairs.

[13]  K. Davis,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Looking at the Quality of American Health Care through the Patient's Lens , 2004 .

[14]  Martin McKee,et al.  Measuring the health of nations: analysis of mortality amenable to health care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  D. Berwick,et al.  Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. , 2003, JAMA.

[16]  Eric Schneider,et al.  Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Karen Davis,et al.  Room for Improvement: Patients Report on the Quality of Their Health Care , 2002 .

[18]  B. Starfield,et al.  World Health Report 2000: how it removes equity from the agenda for public health monitoring and policy. , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  D B Evans,et al.  Comparative efficiency of national health systems: cross national econometric analysis , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Malcolm Segall,et al.  Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000 , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  C. Murray,et al.  People's experience versus people's expectations. , 2001, Health affairs.

[22]  R. Blendon,et al.  The public versus the World Health Organization on health system performance. , 2001, Health affairs.

[23]  V. Tangcharoensathien,et al.  Health-system performance , 2000, The Lancet.

[24]  J Appleby,et al.  Measuring the performance of health systems , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  B. Funderburk,et al.  Mirror, Mirror... , 2004 .

[26]  R R Winton.  MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA , 1977, The Lancet.