Interactive Mathematical Visualisations: Frameworks, Tools and Studies

This chapter discusses issues pertaining to the design of interactive mathematical visualizations in the context of performing epistemic activities. To this end, this chapter presents the following. It explains what mathematical visualizations are and their role in performing epistemic activities. It discusses the general benefits of making mathematical visualizations interactive. It emphasizes the need for having and using frameworks in order to describe, analyze, design, and evaluate the interactive features of mathematical visualization tools. It presents three such frameworks: micro-level interaction, micro-level interactivity, and macro-level interaction. It uses some of the elements of these frameworks to characterize and discuss five sample interactive mathematical visualization tools and to interpret the results of three usability studies. Finally, it offers some suggestions for future lines of research in this area.

[1]  Wayne D. Gray.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2001 .

[2]  S. Payne,et al.  Thinking by Doing? Epistemic Actions in the Tower of Hanoi , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[3]  Rachelle S. Heller,et al.  Using a theoretical multimedia taxonomy framework , 2001, JERC.

[4]  Hai-Ning Liang,et al.  Application of Information Visualization Techniques to the Design of a Mathematical Mindtool: A Usability Study , 2003, Inf. Vis..

[5]  Jim Dorward,et al.  190 Ready-to-Use Activities That Make Math Fun! (Book) , 2004 .

[6]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[7]  Hai-Ning Liang,et al.  Learner-Information Interaction: A Macro-Level Framework Characterizing Visual Cognitive Tools. , 2008 .

[8]  Andrew J. Hanson,et al.  Interactive methods for visualizable geometry , 1994, Computer.

[9]  David Golightly.  Harnessing the interface for domain learning , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[10]  Despina A. Stylianou,et al.  On the interaction of visualization and analysis: the negotiation of a visual representation in expert problem solving , 2002 .

[11]  Robert Spence,et al.  Information Visualization: Design for Interaction (2nd Edition) , 2006 .

[12]  Reinhard Hölzl.  How does ‘dragging’ affect the learning of geometry , 1996, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[13]  Kamran Sedig,et al.  Role of interface manipulation style and scaffolding on cognition and concept learning in learnware , 2001, TCHI.

[14]  Gunnvald B. Svendsen,et al.  The Influence of Interface Style on Problem Solving , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[15]  Hai-Ning Liang,et al.  Designing interfaces that support formation of cognitive maps of transitional processes: an empirical study , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[16]  J. Little,et al.  Interactive topological drawing , 1998 .

[17]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Is interactivity a good thing? assessing its benefits for learning , 2001 .

[18]  Hai-Ning Liang,et al.  Interactivity of Visual Mathematical Representations: Factors Affecting Learning and Cognitive Processes , 2006 .

[19]  Kamran Sedig,et al.  Adjusting degree of visual complexity: an interactive approach for exploring four-dimensional polytopes , 2004, The Visual Computer.

[20]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence , 2000 .

[21]  Thomas Strothotte,et al.  Computational visualization - graphics, abstraction, and interactivity , 2011 .

[22]  Karl Reed,et al.  Towards a taxonomy for guiding multimedia application development , 2002, Ninth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 2002..

[23]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Mark Sumner,et al.  Characterizing Interaction with Visual Mathematical Representations , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..