How to build collaborative advantage

For many years, multinational corporations could compete successfully by exploiting scale and scope economies or by taking advantage of imperfections in the world's goods, labor and capital markets. But these ways of competing are no longer as profitable as they once were. In most industries, multinationals no longer compete primarily with companies whose boundaries are confined to a single nation. Rather, they go head-to-head with a handful of other giants. Against such global competitors, it is hard to sustain an advantage based on traditional economies of scale and scope. MNCs must seek new sources of competitive advantage.While multinationals in the past realized economies of scope principally by utilizing physical assets and exploiting a companywide brand, the new economies of scope are based on the ability of business units, subsidiaries and functional departments within the company to collaborate successfully by sharing knowledge and jointly developing new products and services. Collaboration can be an MNC's source of competitive advantage because it does not occur automatically ? far from it. Indeed, several barriers impede collaboration within complex multiunit organizations. And in order to overcome those barriers, companies will have to develop distinct organizing capabilities that cannot be easily imitated. The authors develop a framework that links managerial action, barriers to interunit collaboration and value creation in MNCs to help managers understand how collaborative advantage can work. The framework conceptualizes collaboration as a set of management levers that reduce four specific barriers to collaboration, leading in turn to several types of value creation. They draw on BP's experience to illustrate the effectiveness of a collaborative approach.

[1]  R. Coase,et al.  COASE, THE NATURE OF THE FIRM, AND THE PRINCIPLES OF MARGINAL ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[2]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[3]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[4]  John Doyle,et al.  Charles Spearman : British Behavioral Scientist , 1863 .

[5]  Wenpin Tsai Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[6]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Morgan Stanley: Becoming a "One-Firm" Firm and The Firmwide 360-degree Performance Evaluation Process at Morgan Stanley TN , 2000 .

[7]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[8]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[9]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[10]  C. Moorehead All rights reserved , 1997 .

[11]  Steven E. Prokesch \Unleashing the Power of Learning: An Interview with British Petroleum's John Browne , 1997 .

[12]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  BECOMING AN IN-GROUP - REEXAMINING THE IMPACT OF FAMILIARITY ON PERCEPTIONS OF GROUP HOMOGENEITY , 1995 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[14]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[15]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[16]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Reduction of Intergroup Discrimination through Individuation of the Out-Group. , 1978 .

[17]  C. Barnard The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .