Exploring the Role of Leadership in Enabling Contextual Ambidexterity

Sustainable success calls for contextually ambidextrous organizing. According to theory, this entails enabling simultaneous high levels of exploration and exploitation within a subsystem. The practices involved in enabling contextual ambidexterity form a major and relatively unexplored leadership challenge. Our main aim is to draw on a combination of ambidexterity and complexity theory insights to understand how contextual ambidexterity emerges in dynamic contexts. We contribute to the literature on the role of leadership in enabling contextual ambidexterity by exploring the daily practices leaders enact to stimulate exploration and exploitation as well as to shift dynamically between them to (re)gain contextual ambidexterity. We present the results of two qualitative studies exploring leadership in project-based organizations where the pressure for contextual ambidexterity is relevant. We show that in responding adaptively to environmental stimuli, leaders shift between practices to emphasize exploitation or exploration to (re)gain the needed high levels of both, and their enactments are bounded by the conditions of keeping exploration and exploitation simultaneously high. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding contextual ambidexterity as a dynamic accomplishment that emerges in everyday interactions, the role of leaders in enabling contextual ambidexterity, and the need for HR managers to support leaders in enacting this dynamic form of leadership.

[1]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  Modelling the Joint Impact of the CEO and the TMT on Organizational Ambidexterity , 2009 .

[2]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership , 2008 .

[3]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  It's Only Temporary: Time Frame and the Dynamics of Creative Project Teams , 2013 .

[5]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[6]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity , 2009 .

[7]  R. Defillippi,et al.  Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial , 2004 .

[8]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[9]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. , 2002 .

[10]  Juliet M. Corbin,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2008 .

[11]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[12]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The management of innovation in project-based firms , 2000 .

[13]  J. Swart,et al.  Reconsidering Boundaries: Human Resource Management in a Networked World , 2014 .

[14]  Michael Frese,et al.  Explaining the Heterogeneity of the Leadership-Innovation Relationship: Ambidextrous Leadership , 2011 .

[15]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[16]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change , 2003 .

[17]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  CROSSROADS - Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[18]  John Child,et al.  Organizations As Adaptive Systems in Complex Environments: the Case of China , 1999 .

[19]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2009 .

[21]  Isabel M. Prieto,et al.  Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain , 2012 .

[22]  Henry Mintzberg Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[23]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[24]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[25]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[26]  Wendy K. Smith Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .

[27]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies , 2013 .

[28]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Walking the Tightrope: An Assessment of the Relationship between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Ambidexterity , 2013 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[30]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[31]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects , 2011 .

[32]  H. Volberda,et al.  Exploring Exploration Orientation and its Determinants: Some Empirical Evidence , 2004 .

[33]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[34]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[35]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Integrating Modernist and Postmodernist Perspectives on Organizations: A Complexity Science Bridge , 2010 .

[36]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[38]  T. Cooke‐Davies,et al.  We're not in Kansas Anymore, Toto: Mapping the Strange Landscape of Complexity Theory, and Its Relationship to Project Management , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[39]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[40]  J. Swart,et al.  Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[41]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Ambidexterity and Global IS Project Success: A Theoretical Model , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[42]  Lars Lindkvist,et al.  Project organization : Exploring its adaptation properties , 2008 .

[43]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[44]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[46]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[47]  C. Pearce The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[48]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition , 2009 .

[49]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[50]  M. Uhl‐Bien,et al.  Complexity Leadership in Bureaucratic Forms of Organizing: A Meso Model , 2009 .

[51]  B. McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era ! , 2007 .

[52]  Ralph Stacey Complexity and Organizational Reality: Uncertainty and the Need to Rethink Management after the Collapse of Investment Capitalism , 2009 .

[53]  Juani Swart,et al.  Options‐based HRM, intellectual capital, and exploratory and exploitative learning in law firms' practice groups , 2012 .

[54]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[55]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizational Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovation: A Comparative Study of UK and Chinese High‐Tech Firms , 2014 .

[56]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .

[57]  B. Menguc,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity , 2005 .

[58]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[59]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance , 2012 .

[60]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[61]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[62]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[63]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  Organizational responses to complexity: the effect on organizational performance , 2000 .

[64]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms , 2010, Organ. Sci..