Tracing the trajectories of issues, and their democratic deficits, on the Web: The case of the Development Gateway and its doubles

This article explores the ways in which actor‐network theory (ANT) invites an alternative account of democratic process, namely in terms of issue‐formation, which is particularly well suited to the study of democratic practices facilitated by information and communication technologies (ICT). Engaging with arguments that have been made in political theory in favor of the re‐invigoration of institutional and extra‐institutional forms of democratic debate, this article argues that a re‐valuation of issue‐politics is more than timely. In this respect, actor‐network theory is a particularly fruitful approach, since it provides the conceptual and methodological equipment to account for democracy in terms of processes of issue formation. Such an account of democracy, it is argued, is particularly appropriate to the study of ICT‐based democratic processes, since in the context of ICT distributed networks that configure around particular issues can be seen to emerge as the carriers of democratic process. Moreover, ANT provides the conceptual and methodological tools for the development of a research practice of tracing public controversies as they are enacted in such networks on the Web. In tracing a particular controversy on the Web, around the Development Gateway, a portal for development information set up by the World Bank, one begins to articulate an alternative understanding of the significance of ICT for institutional as well as extra‐institutional forms of democracy. A number of requirements on effective democratic action, as facilitated by ICT, are derived from the case study, which move beyond the requirement of social networking, i.e. the building of partnerships, and informational networking, i.e. the exchange of knowledge and opinion. Issue‐networking here comes to the fore as indispensable to democratic politics.

[1]  M. Walzer Toward a Global Civil Society , 2022 .

[2]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A theoretical review of management and information systems using a critical communications theory , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Virtual Society?: Technology, Cyberbole, Reality , 2002 .

[4]  Damian Tambini,et al.  Book review: political machines: governing a technological society, by Andrew Barry. New York: Athlone, 2001 , 2002 .

[5]  Bill Doolin,et al.  To reveal is to critique: actor–network theory and critical information systems research , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Alison E. Adam,et al.  Exploring the gender question in critical information systems , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[7]  E. Gomart,et al.  Is That Politics? For an inquiry into forms in contemporary politics , 2002 .

[8]  Noortje Marres May the true victim of defacement stand up: On reading the network configurations of scandal on the Web , 2002 .

[9]  Craig Warkentin,et al.  Reshaping World Politics: Ngos, the Internet, and Global Civil Society , 2001 .

[10]  J. Naughton CONTESTED SPACE: THE INTERNET AND GLOBAL CIVIL SOCIETY , 2001 .

[11]  A. Barry Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society , 2001 .

[12]  S. Coleman,et al.  Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation , 2001 .

[13]  Anthony G. Wilhelm Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace , 2000 .

[14]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  Reinvigorating Democracy: British Politics and the Internet , 2000 .

[15]  Noortje Marres,et al.  Depluralising the Web and Repluralising Public Debate: The Case of the GM Food Debate on the Web , 2000 .

[16]  David Held,et al.  The transformation of political community: rethinking democracy in the context of globalization , 1999 .

[17]  Ulrich Beck,et al.  The reinvention of politics : rethinking modernity in the global social order , 1999 .

[18]  Nelly E.J. Oudshoorn,et al.  Gender and the Design of a Digital City , 1999 .

[19]  B. Latour Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[20]  Philip E. Agre The Internet and Public Discourse , 1998, First Monday.

[21]  The Changing Contours of Political Community: rethinking democracy in the context of globalization , 1998 .

[22]  S. Sassen Electronic space and power , 1997 .

[23]  A. Appadurai Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization , 1996 .

[24]  Thierry Bardini,et al.  The Social Construction of the Personal Computer User , 1995 .

[25]  W. Connolly The ethos of pluralization , 1995 .

[26]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[27]  B. Latour The pasteurization of France , 1988 .

[28]  Christian,et al.  The Author Would like to Thank , 1988 .

[29]  M. Douglas How Institutions Think , 1986 .

[30]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[31]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .