Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.

Recent research has found that while speaking, subjects react to perturbations in pitch of voice auditory feedback by changing their voice fundamental frequency (F0) to compensate for the perceived pitch-shift. The long response latencies (150-200 ms) suggest they may be too slow to assist in on-line control of the local pitch contour patterns associated with lexical tones on a syllable-to-syllable basis. In the present study, we introduced pitch-shifted auditory feedback to native speakers of Mandarin Chinese while they produced disyllabic sequences /ma ma/ with different tonal combinations at a natural speaking rate. Voice F0 response latencies (100-150 ms) to the pitch perturbations were shorter than syllable durations reported elsewhere. Response magnitudes increased from 50 cents during static tone to 85 cents during dynamic tone productions. Response latencies and peak times decreased in phrases involving a dynamic change in F0. The larger response magnitudes and shorter latency and peak times in tasks requiring accurate, dynamic control of F0, indicate this automatic system for regulation of voice F0 may be task-dependent. These findings suggest that auditory feedback may be used to help regulate voice F0 during production of bi-tonal Mandarin phrases.

[1]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  Task-specific sensorimotor interactions in speech production , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Mechanism for reflex reversal during walking in human tibialis anterior muscle revealed by single motor unit recording. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Yi Xu Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin , 1997 .

[4]  C. Larson,et al.  Changes in voice fundamental frequency following discharge of single motor units in cricothyroid and thyroarytenoid muscles. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  Yi Xu,et al.  Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0contours , 1999 .

[6]  Thomas M Donath,et al.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Ingo R. Titze,et al.  Twitch response in the canine vocalis muscle. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  J. Abbs,et al.  Sensorimotor characteristics of speech motor sequences , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  T A Burnett,et al.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  C. Capaday,et al.  The modulation of human reflexes during functional motor tasks , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Modulation of the myotatic reflex gain in man during intentional movements , 1980, Brain Research.

[12]  J. Abbs,et al.  Dynamic control of the perioral system during speech: kinematic analyses of autogenic and nonautogenic sensorimotor processes. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Thomas M Donath,et al.  Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Charles R. Larson,et al.  Effects of electrical stimulation of cricothyroid and thyroarytenoid muscles on voice fundamental frequency , 1988 .

[15]  K. Kalveram,et al.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  Charles R Larson,et al.  Early pitch-shift response is active in both steady and dynamic voice pitch control. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Kelso,et al.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  C. Larson,et al.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Emily Q. Wang,et al.  Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2001, Speech Commun..

[20]  S. Shaiman,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Abbs,et al.  Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Kevin G. Munhall,et al.  The role of auditory feedback during phonation: studies of Mandarin tone production , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[23]  San Duanmu,et al.  Syllabic weight and syllabic duration: a correlation between phonology and phonetics , 1994, Phonology.

[24]  Anders Löfqvist,et al.  Dynamics of intergestural timing: a perturbation study of lip-larynx coordination , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  R Chua,et al.  Differential regulation of cutaneous and H-reflexes during leg cycling in humans. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  P. Rack,et al.  Task‐dependent changes in the response of human wrist joints to mechanical disturbance. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  W. McIlroy,et al.  Modulation of human short latency reflexes between standing and walking , 1991, Brain Research.

[28]  I R Titze,et al.  Twitch response in the canine vocalis muscle. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  C. Larson,et al.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.