Cell Phones, Text Messaging, and Facebook: Competing Time Demands of Today's College Students

This study of time use and entertainment choices of college students used a triangulated approach to discover how college students use and manage their time. From the data we gathered through time diaries, students indicated that the greatest amount of personal time is spent in some form of communication (talking face to face, texting, talking on the phone, and using social networking Web sites). Students spent about the same amount of time studying for courses (M = 11.91 hours per week, SD = 3.27) as they do actually attending courses each week (M = 12.35, SD 4.51). By comparison, students reported spending 14.35 hours each week texting and 6.49 hours talking on the phone. Females had statistically higher GPAs than males and scored higher on academic striving. Data indicated that students were engaged by instructors who seemed passionate about the content they were teaching, viewed their college education through the lens of a consumer model, and expected to have a personal connection with their professors. Recommendations for adapting instructional strategies are provided.

[1]  J. Brophy.  Synthesis of Research on Strategies for Motivating Students to Learn. , 1987 .

[2]  S. Nonis,et al.  Where Does the Time Go? A Diary Approach to Business and Marketing Students’ Time Use , 2006 .

[3]  A. McGlynn.  Teaching Millennials, Our Newest Cultural Cohort. , 2005 .

[4]  Susan A. Ariew,et al.  National Survey of Student Engagement , 2003 .

[5]  Mike Moore,et al.  Learners Come in Different Types , 2007 .

[6]  Trudy L. Hanson,et al.  The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness , 2004 .

[7]  Cathy Small,et al.  My Freshman Year: What a Professor Learned by Becoming a Student , 2005 .

[8]  Lanette L. Pogue,et al.  The Effect of Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy and Credibility on Student Motivation and Affective Learning , 2006 .

[9]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[10]  Gillian Hampden-Thompson,et al.  The condition of education, 2005 , 2005 .

[11]  Elizabeth J. Whitt,et al.  Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter , 2012 .

[12]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The Condition of education , 1975 .

[13]  Thomas R. Lindlof.  Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[14]  Li-tze Hu,et al.  Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. , 2001 .

[15]  Angela Provitera McGlynn,et al.  Millennials in College: How Do We Motivate Them?. , 2008 .

[16]  Baruch Offir,et al.  Introverts, Extroverts, and Achievement in a Distance Learning Environment , 2007 .

[17]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Impatience versus achievement strivings in the type A pattern: differential effects on students' health and academic achievement. , 1987, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Steve Jones,et al.  The Internet Goes to College , 2002 .