Precision behavioral phenotyping as a strategy for uncovering the biological correlates of psychopathology
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. DeYoung | R. Nusslock | A. Fornito | A. Kaczkurkin | A. Shackman | R. Abend | R. Pasion | N. Eaton | L. Satchell | J. Tiego | N. Goulter | Samuel E. Cooper | Kelsey E. Hagan | M. Bellgrove | Elizabeth A. Martin | Rany Natalie Nicholas R. Antonia N. Robin Abend Goulter Eaton Kaczkurkin Nusslock
[1] M. Nour,et al. Functional neuroimaging in psychiatry and the case for failing better , 2022, Neuron.
[2] J. Vogelstein,et al. Suboptimal phenotypic reliability impedes reproducible human neuroscience , 2022, bioRxiv.
[3] Timothy O. Laumann,et al. Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals , 2022, Nature.
[4] C. Conway,et al. A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) Primer for Mental Health Researchers , 2021, Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[5] Russell H. Tobe,et al. A longitudinal resource for studying connectome development and its psychiatric associations during childhood , 2021, Scientific Data.
[6] OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, Schizophrenia bulletin.
[7] Yueqin Hu,et al. Data Pollution in Neuropsychiatry-An Under-Recognized but Critical Barrier to Research Progress. , 2021, JAMA psychiatry.
[8] X. Zuo,et al. Chinese Color Nest Project : An accelerated longitudinal brain-mind cohort , 2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.
[9] D. Watson,et al. Development of Measures for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Collaborative Scale Development Project , 2021, Assessment.
[10] Isabella M. Palumbo,et al. Linking RDoC and HiTOP: A new interface for advancing psychiatric nosology and neuroscience. , 2021, Clinical psychology review.
[11] D. Watson,et al. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence. , 2021, Annual review of clinical psychology.
[12] Evan M. Gordon,et al. Individual-Specific Areal-Level Parcellations Improve Functional Connectivity Prediction of Behavior , 2021, bioRxiv.
[13] Michael P. Milham,et al. Charting brain growth in tandem with brain templates at school age. , 2020, Science bulletin.
[14] D. Barch,et al. Associations Between Resting State Functional Connectivity and a Hierarchical Dimensional Structure of Psychopathology in Middle Childhood , 2020, bioRxiv.
[15] A. Palmer,et al. Emerging phenotyping strategies will advance our understanding of psychiatric genetics , 2020, Nature Neuroscience.
[16] T. Thiagarajan,et al. The Heterogeneity of Mental Health Assessment , 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry.
[17] D. Watson,et al. Transdiagnostic approaches to psychopathology measurement: Recommendations for measure selection, data analysis, and participant recruitment. , 2020, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[18] A. Smilde,et al. Corruption of the Pearson correlation coefficient by measurement error and its estimation, bias, and correction under different error models , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[19] Christopher J Patrick,et al. Interfacing neural constructs with the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology: 'Why' and 'how'. , 2019, Personality and mental health.
[20] L. Uddin,et al. Pushing the Boundaries of Psychiatric Neuroimaging to Ground Diagnosis in Biology , 2019, eNeuro.
[21] G. A. Miller,et al. Extreme-groups designs in studies of dimensional phenomena: Advantages, caveats, and recommendations. , 2019, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[22] Max W. Y. Lam,et al. Genome-wide Association Studies in Ancestrally Diverse Populations: Opportunities, Methods, Pitfalls, and Recommendations , 2019, Cell.
[23] John Read,et al. Heterogeneity in psychiatric diagnostic classification , 2019, Psychiatry Research.
[24] E. Feczko,et al. The Heterogeneity Problem: Approaches to Identify Psychiatric Subtypes , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[25] M. Milham,et al. Harnessing reliability for neuroscience research , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.
[26] D. Watson,et al. Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. , 2019, Psychological assessment.
[27] A. Mechelli,et al. Common Dysfunction of Large-Scale Neurocognitive Networks Across Psychiatric Disorders , 2019, Biological Psychiatry.
[28] D. Watson,et al. Delineating and validating higher-order dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study , 2019, bioRxiv.
[29] O. Andreassen,et al. Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology , 2019, Molecular Psychiatry.
[30] Xi-Nian Zuo,et al. The anatomy of reliability: a must read for future human brain mapping. , 2018, Science bulletin.
[31] D. Watson,et al. The perils of hierarchical exclusion rules: A further word of caution , 2018, Depression and anxiety.
[32] S. Rauch,et al. Clinical Applications of Neuroimaging in Psychiatric Disorders. , 2018, The American journal of psychiatry.
[33] Avshalom Caspi,et al. All for One and One for All: Mental Disorders in One Dimension. , 2018, The American journal of psychiatry.
[34] G. Salum,et al. From positive psychology to psychopathology: the continuum of attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder , 2018, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.
[35] N. Volkow,et al. The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration , 2017, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.
[36] Ben D. Fulcher,et al. An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.
[37] Gerome Breen,et al. Psychiatric Genomics: An Update and an Agenda , 2017, bioRxiv.
[38] P. McGuffin,et al. Advancing psychiatric genetics through dissecting heterogeneity , 2017, Human molecular genetics.
[39] P. Visscher,et al. 10 Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.
[40] E. Fried,et al. Moving forward: how depression heterogeneity hinders progress in treatment and research , 2017, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.
[41] R. Krueger,et al. A Hierarchical Causal Taxonomy of Psychopathology Across the Life Span , 2017, Psychological bulletin.
[42] Tor D Wager,et al. Imaging biomarkers and biotypes for depression , 2017, Nature Medicine.
[43] Thomas E. Nichols,et al. Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[44] Yves Rosseel,et al. Hypothesis Testing Using Factor Score Regression , 2016, Educational and psychological measurement.
[45] L. Rescorla,et al. The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment. , 2016 .
[46] M. Eid,et al. Measuring Method Effects , 2016 .
[47] K. Kendler. The Phenomenology of Major Depression and the Representativeness and Nature of DSM Criteria. , 2016, The American journal of psychiatry.
[48] S. Reise,et al. Item response theory and the measurement of psychiatric constructs: some empirical and conceptual issues and challenges , 2016, Psychological Medicine.
[49] R. Kahn,et al. Detecting Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Psychiatric Disorders: Sample Size Matters , 2016, Front. Psychiatry.
[50] M. Kaakinen,et al. Latent variable mixture modeling in psychiatric research – a review and application , 2015, Psychological Medicine.
[51] Eiko I. Fried,et al. Depression sum-scores don’t add up: why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential , 2015, BMC Medicine.
[52] E. Fried,et al. Depression is not a consistent syndrome: An investigation of unique symptom patterns in the STAR*D study. , 2015, Journal of affective disorders.
[53] Odilia Yim,et al. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Comparison of Three Linkage Measures and Application to Psychological Data , 2015 .
[54] Scott O Lilienfeld,et al. The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): an analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges. , 2014, Behaviour research and therapy.
[55] Xi-Nian Zuo,et al. Brain Network Informed Subject Community Detection In Early-Onset Schizophrenia , 2014, Scientific Reports.
[56] Sandhya Ramrakha,et al. The p Factor , 2014, Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[57] Bruce N Cuthbert,et al. The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology , 2014, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.
[58] Lars Tummers,et al. Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[59] Megan E. Patrick,et al. What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[60] B. Muthén,et al. Models and Strategies for Factor Mixture Analysis: An Example Concerning the Structure Underlying Psychological Disorders , 2013, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.
[61] Patrick J. Rosopa,et al. Managing heteroscedasticity in general linear models. , 2013, Psychological methods.
[62] Michael C Neale,et al. Evidence for multiple genetic factors underlying DSM-IV criteria for major depression. , 2013, JAMA psychiatry.
[63] T. Insel,et al. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC , 2013, BMC Medicine.
[64] S. Reise,et al. Scoring and Modeling Psychological Measures in the Presence of Multidimensionality , 2013, Journal of personality assessment.
[65] D. Posthuma,et al. Power in GWAS: lifting the curse of the clinical cut-off , 2013, Molecular Psychiatry.
[66] S. Reise. The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models , 2012 .
[67] P. Elliott,et al. UK Biobank: Current status and what it means for epidemiology , 2012 .
[68] Wen-Ming Luh,et al. Differentiating BOLD and non-BOLD signals in fMRI time series using multi-echo EPI , 2012, NeuroImage.
[69] Scott B. MacKenzie,et al. Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.
[70] P Kuppens,et al. Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research , 2011, Psychological Medicine.
[71] M. Thomas. The Value of Item Response Theory in Clinical Assessment: A Review , 2011, Assessment.
[72] K. Markon,et al. The reliability and validity of discrete and continuous measures of psychopathology: a quantitative review. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.
[73] D. Watson,et al. Computerized Adaptive Assessment of Personality Disorder: Introducing the CAT–PD Project , 2011, Journal of personality assessment.
[74] Philippe Jacquart,et al. On making causal claims: A review and recommendations , 2010 .
[75] D. Posthuma,et al. Phenotypic Complexity, Measurement Bias, and Poor Phenotypic Resolution Contribute to the Missing Heritability Problem in Genetic Association Studies , 2010, PloS one.
[76] T. Insel,et al. Wesleyan University From the SelectedWorks of Charles A . Sanislow , Ph . D . 2010 Research Domain Criteria ( RDoC ) : Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders , 2018 .
[77] R. Plomin,et al. Common disorders are quantitative traits , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[78] N. Rose,et al. Biomarkers in psychiatry , 2009, Nature.
[79] M. Strauss,et al. Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology. , 2009, Annual review of clinical psychology.
[80] Steven P Reise,et al. Item response theory and clinical measurement. , 2009, Annual review of clinical psychology.
[81] De Ayala,et al. The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory , 2008 .
[82] S. Hyman. Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[83] Wei Zhu,et al. Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data , 2007, Human brain mapping.
[84] Fritz Drasgow,et al. Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.
[85] R. Devellis. Classical Test Theory , 2006, Medical care.
[86] L. R. Goldberg. Presidential Paper Doing it all Bass-Ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down , 2006 .
[87] Russell A. Poldrack,et al. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Response Inhibition: Relevance for Genetic Research in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.
[88] S. Hogg-Johnson,et al. A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
[89] Scott B. MacKenzie,et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[90] M. Eid,et al. Separating trait effects from trait-specific method effects in multitrait-multimethod models: a multiple-indicator CT-C(M-1) model. , 2003, Psychological methods.
[91] D. Streiner. Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.
[92] R. Kendell,et al. Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.
[93] J W Grice,et al. Computing and Evaluating Factor Scores , 2004 .
[94] R. Vandenberg,et al. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .
[95] A. Erkanli,et al. Impaired but undiagnosed. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
[96] A. Sias. Interpretation of educational measurements. , 1928 .