Introduction and Overview

The explosion of information technology in the last two decades has led to a substantial growth in quantity, diversity and complexity of web-accessible linguistic data. These resources become even more useful when linked with each other, and the last few years have seen the emergence of numerous approaches in various disciplines concerned with linguistic resources. It is the challenge of our time to store, interlink and exploit this wealth of data accumulated in more than half a century of computational linguistics (Dostert, 1955), of empirical, corpus-based study of language (Francis and Kucera, 1964), and of computational lexicography (Morris, 1969) in all its heterogeneity. A crucial question involved here is the interoperability of the language resources, actively addressed by the community since the late 1980s (Text Encoding Initiative, 1990), but still a problem that is partially solved at best (Ide and Pustejovsky, 2010). A closely related challenge is information integration, i.e., how heterogeneous information from different sources can be retrieved and combined in an efficient way. With the rise of the Semantic Web, new representation formalisms and novel technologies have become available, and, independently from each other, researchers in different communities have recognized the potential of these devel-

[1]  Ulrich Heid,et al.  Formalising Multi-layer Corpora in OWL DL - Lexicon Modelling, Querying and Consistency Control , 2008, IJCNLP.

[2]  Nancy Ide,et al.  GrAF: A Graph-based Format for Linguistic Annotations , 2007, LAW@ACL.

[3]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification , 2002 .

[4]  P. Davies The American heritage dictionary of the English language , 1981 .

[5]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Description Logics as Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web , 2005, Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning.

[6]  Charles F. Goldfarb,et al.  SGML handbook , 1990 .

[7]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[8]  Nancy Ide,et al.  Encoding Linguistic Corpora , 1998, VLC@COLING/ACL.

[9]  Eugene S. McCartney,et al.  Motif-Index of Folk-Literature: A Classification of Narrative Elements in Folktales, Ballads, Myths, Fables, Mediaeval Romances, Exempla, Fabliaux, Jest-Books and Local Legends. Stith Thompson , 1959 .

[10]  Mark Liberman,et al.  A formal framework for linguistic annotation , 1999, Speech Commun..

[11]  Sebastian Hellmann The Semantic Gap of Formalized Meaning , 2010, ESWC.

[12]  W. J. Hutchins,et al.  The Georgetown-IBM experiment demonstrated in January 1954 , 2004, AMTA.

[13]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference , 2009 .

[14]  Stefanie Dipper,et al.  XML-based Stand-off Representation and Exploitation of Multi-Level Linguistic Annotation , 2005, Berliner XML Tage.

[15]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Extensible Markup Language (XML) , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[16]  Graham Wilcock An OWL Ontology for HPSG , 2007, ACL.

[17]  Steve Cassidy An RDF realisation of LAF in the DADA annotation server , 2010, ACL 2010.

[18]  Nancy Ide,et al.  What Does Interoperability Mean , Anyway ? Toward an Operational Definition of Interoperability for Language Technology , 2010 .