Adaptive Boundary Conditions for Physically Based Follow-Up Breast MR Image Registration

This paper presents an algorithm for non-rigid registration of breast MRI follow-up images that compensates for differences in patient positioning while maintaining real anatomical and pathological changes. The proposed method uses a biomechanical model to constrain the deformation of the internal breast tissue according to elastic continuum mechanics, which is driven by suitable boundary conditions that align the breast surfaces in the images to be registered. Typically, such boundary conditions impose one-to-one surface point correspondences that are established a priori. We investigate alternative, more flexible boundary conditions that do not depend on fixed point correspondences and do not assume completely accurate breast surface segmentation in both images. More specifically, we allow for sliding motion of one surface over the other during deformation as well as for restricted motion perpendicular to the initially segmented boundary surface, based on the internal elastic forces and local intensity information. We evaluate the impact of different boundary conditions on registration quality from the subtraction images obtained for repeated scans of healthy volunteers with intermediate repositioning, using rigid body and free form whole volume intensity based registration for comparison, and also present initial results for actual patient data. Our results demonstrate a drastic reduction in subtraction artifacts using our model, without compromising the biomechanical validity of the deformation field such as unrealistically large local volume changes as with traditional voxel intensity based registration.

[1]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Biomechanically Based Elastic Breast Registration Using Mass Tensor Simulation , 2006, MICCAI.

[2]  J. Schnabel,et al.  Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  Automated Finite-Element Analysis for Deformable Registration of Prostate Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  A hybrid elastic model for real-time cutting, deformations, and force feedback for surgery training and simulation , 2000, The Visual Computer.

[5]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Predicting soft tissue deformations for a maxillofacial surgery planning system: From computational strategies to a complete clinical validation , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Dirk Loeckx,et al.  Automated Nonrigid Intra-Patient Image Registration Using B-Splines (Automatische niet-rigide intra-patient beeldregistratie met behulp van B-splines) , 2006 .

[7]  N V Ruiter,et al.  AUTOMATIC IMAGE MATCHING FOR BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSTICS BY A 3D DEFORMATION MODEL OF THE MAMMA , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[8]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Robust nonrigid registration to capture brain shift from intraoperative MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  K. Brock,et al.  Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. , 2005, Medical physics.

[10]  Maxime Sermesant,et al.  Application of soft tissue modelling to image-guided surgery. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Registration of 3-d intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite-element biomechanical model , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  D. Yan,et al.  Reducing uncertainties in volumetric image based deformable organ registration. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  A hybrid elastic model for real-time cutting, deformations, and force feedback for surgery training and simulation , 1999, Proceedings Computer Animation 1999.