Additive Utility Functions with Double-Log Consumer Demand Functions

Frisch (1959) proposed the adoption of direct additive utility functions to facilitate empirical demand analysis. Double-log demand functions resulting therefrom are composed of the real income effect and the relative price effect. I show that the income elasticities and the own-price elasticities of demand are (approximately) constant (an assumption almost invariably made in applications) when the utility function is a generalized CES type. The income elasticity of marginal utility is the overall elasticity of substitution with no cardinal implications that Frisch stressed upon. The paper examines how approximate the constancy assumption is. A comparison is made with the linear expenditure system that is a special case. I suggest that the implied similarity of utility functions among countries provides the missing basis for international comparisons of purchasing power parities.

[1]  Leif Johansen,et al.  A Multi-Sectoral Study of Economic Growth , 1962 .

[2]  Bela Balassa,et al.  The Purchasing-Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Lawrence R. Klein An Introduction To Econometrics , 1962 .

[4]  Herman Rubin,et al.  A Constant-Utility Index of the Cost of Living , 1947 .

[5]  Robert A. Pollak,et al.  Habit Formation and Dynamic Demand Functions , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  A. Powell,et al.  A Multi-Sectoral Analysis of Consumer demand in the Post-War Period , 1968 .

[7]  K. Sato A Two-Level Constant-Elasticity-of-Substitution Production Function , 1967 .

[8]  R. H. Strotz The Empirical Implications of a Utility Tree , 1957 .

[9]  R. Allen,et al.  A contribution to demand analysis , 1965 .

[10]  J. Nicholson Variations in Working Class Family Expenditure , 1949 .

[11]  A. Wald The Approximate Determination of Indifference Surfaces by Means of Engel Curves , 1940 .

[12]  Alan Powell,et al.  A Complete System of Consumer Demand Equations for the Australian Economy Fitted by a Model of Additive Preferences , 1966 .

[13]  A. Barten,et al.  Consumer Demand Functions under Conditions of Almost Additive Preferences , 1964 .

[14]  S. Kuznets Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: VII. The Share and Structures of Consumption , 1962, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[15]  M. Gilbert,et al.  An international comparison of national products and the purchasing power of currencies , 1953 .

[16]  H. A. John Green DIRECT ADDITIVITY AND CONSUMERS' BEHAVIOUR , 1961 .

[17]  R. Stone Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis : an application to the pattern of British demand , 1954 .

[18]  H. Houthakker An International Comparison of Household Expenditure Patterns, Commemorating the Centenary of Engel's Law , 1957 .

[19]  S. Turnovsky,et al.  Some Aspects of the Aggregation Problem for Composite Demand Equations , 1966 .

[20]  The Econometrics of Family Budgets , 1952 .

[21]  C. Leser Forms of Engel functions , 1963 .

[22]  S. Prais Non-linear estimates of the Engel curves , 1952 .

[23]  V. Mukerji A Generalized S.M.A.C. Function with Constant Ratios of Elasticity of Substitution , 1963 .

[24]  Ragnar Frisch,et al.  A Complete Scheme for Computing all Direct and Cross Demand Elasticities in a Model with many Factors , 1959 .

[25]  R. Byron A Simple Method for Estimating Demand Systems Under Separable Utility Assumptions , 1970 .

[26]  John Hicks,et al.  A Revision of Demand Theory , 1957 .

[27]  D. Heien,et al.  The S-Branch Utility Tree: A Generalization of the Linear Expenditure System , 1972 .

[28]  H. Uzawa,et al.  A Note on Separability in Demand Analysis , 1964 .

[29]  R. Parks,et al.  Systems of Demand Equations: An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Functional Forms , 1969 .

[30]  Abram Burk Real Income, Expenditure Proportionality, and Frisch's “New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility” , 1936 .

[31]  W. M. Gorman Production Functions in which the Elasticities of Substitution stand in Fixed Proportions to each other , 1965 .