On the meaning of some focus-sensitive particles

In this paper, I argue that the aspectual, marginality, and concessive uses of the grading particles still and already can be reduced to the fol lowing three classes of focus sensitive-grading particles: additive particles like too, scalar particles like even, and exclusive particles like only. The meaning differences among the occurrences of still (and already) are mostly reduced to the differences among these three classes of grading particles. In turn, these differences are shown to correlate with what type of object is denoted by the phrase in the scope of the particle. The proposal has repercussions also for the focus-sensitive particle again. I investigate the latter too, and I propose a parallel between the temporal and nominal domains where the contrast between still and again is analyzed along the lines of the contrast between definite and indefinite noun phrases.

[1]  G. Cinque Adverbs and functional heads , 1999 .

[2]  Greg N. Carlson,et al.  Same and different: Some consequences for syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[3]  Mats Rooth Association with focus , 1985 .

[4]  Louise McNally,et al.  SCALE STRUCTURE AND THE SEMANTIC TYPOLOGY OF GRADABLE PREDICATES , 2002 .

[5]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  The Different Readings of Wieder 'Again': A Structural Account , 1996, J. Semant..

[6]  Anita Mittwoch,et al.  The relationship betweenschon/already andnoch/still: A reply to Löbner , 1993 .

[7]  A. Kratzer Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[8]  Michela Ippolito,et al.  Semantic Composition and Presupposition Projection in Subjunctive Conditionals , 2007 .

[9]  Peter Lasersohn Parts, wholes, and still , 1999 .

[10]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[11]  A. Kratzer The Notional Category of Modality , 2008 .

[12]  C. Barker The Dynamics of Vagueness , 2002 .

[13]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Additive Particles under Stress , 1998 .

[14]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[15]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Alternatives for Aspectual Particles: Semantics of still and already , 2000 .

[16]  I. Heim Degree Operators and Scope , 2000 .

[17]  D. Pesetsky Phrasal Movement and Its Kin , 2000 .

[18]  James D. McCawley,et al.  Everything That Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know About Logic , 1980, Stud Logica.

[19]  P. Unger,et al.  Semantics and Philosophy , 1974 .

[20]  A. Kratzer More Structural Analogies Between Pronouns and Tenses , 1998 .

[21]  Hans Kamp,et al.  Linguistic form and its computation , 2001 .

[22]  A. Stechow COMPARING SEMANTIC THEORIES OF COMPARISON , 1984 .

[23]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Interpreting focus again , 2004 .

[24]  Christopher Potts The logic of conventional implicatures , 2004 .

[26]  E. König,et al.  Temporal and non-temporal uses of ‘noch’ and ‘schon’ in German , 1977 .

[27]  Sebastian Löbner,et al.  GermanSchon - Erst - Noch: An integrated analysis , 1989 .

[28]  Johan Rooryck,et al.  Phrase structure and the lexicon , 1996 .

[29]  Laura A. Michaelis 'Continuity' within Three Scalar Models: The Polysemy of Adverbial Still , 1993, J. Semant..

[30]  Irene Heim,et al.  Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs , 1992, J. Semant..