Cell shape, spreading symmetry, and the polarization of stress-fibers in cells

The active regulation of cellular forces during cell adhesion plays an important role in the determination of cell size, shape and internal structure. While on flat, homogeneous and isotropic substrates some cells spread isotropically, others spread anisotropically and assume elongated structures. In addition, in their native environment as well as in vitro experiments, the cell shape and spreading asymmetry can be modulated by the local distribution of adhesive molecules and topography of the environment. We present a simple elastic model, and experiments on stem cells to explain the variation of cell size with the matrix rigidity. In addition, we predict the experimental consequences of two mechanisms of acto-myosin polarization and focus here on the effect of the cell spreading asymmetry on the regulation of the stress-fiber alignment in the cytoskeleton. We show that when cell spreading is sufficiently asymmetric the alignment of acto-myosin forces in the cell increases monotonically with the matrix rigidity; however, in general this alignment is non-monotonic as shown previously. These results highlight the importance of the symmetry characteristics of cell spreading in the regulation of cytoskeleton structure and suggest a mechanism by which different cell types may acquire different morphologies and internal structures in different mechanical environments.

[1]  C Gough,et al.  Introduction to Solid State Physics (6th edn) , 1986 .

[2]  A. Carlsson Contractile stress generation by actomyosin gels. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions , 2008 .

[5]  J. D. Eshelby The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  D. Discher,et al.  Patterning, prestress, and peeling dynamics of myocytes. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  David F Meaney,et al.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[10]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[11]  Ajay Gopinathan,et al.  Dynamics of membranes driven by actin polymerization. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[12]  D A Weitz,et al.  Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Jansen,et al.  Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  A. Curtis,et al.  Orthogonal (transverse) arrangements of actin in endothelia and fibroblasts , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  L. Claes,et al.  Cell orientation induced by extracellular signals , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[17]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Quantification of Cell Edge Velocities and Traction Forces Reveals Distinct Motility Modules during Cell Spreading , 2008, PloS one.

[18]  Active self-polarization of contractile cells in asymmetrically shaped domains. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[20]  D E Ingber,et al.  Cellular control lies in the balance of forces. , 1998, Current opinion in cell biology.

[21]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Emergence of Patterned Stem Cell Differentiation Within Multicellular Structures , 2008, Stem cells.

[22]  Song Li,et al.  Anisotropic mechanosensing by mesenchymal stem cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[24]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Elastic interactions of active cells with soft materials. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[26]  Toshio Mura,et al.  The Elastic Field Outside an Ellipsoidal Inclusion , 1977 .

[27]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Microtissue elasticity: measurements by atomic force microscopy and its influence on cell differentiation. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[28]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  R. Siems Mechanical Interactions of Point Defects , 1968, December 1.

[30]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Charles L. Tucker,et al.  Stiffness Predictions for Unidirectional Short-Fiber Composites: Review and Evaluation , 1999 .

[32]  M. A. Jaswon,et al.  Two-dimensional elastic inclusion problems , 1961, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[33]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[34]  J. D. Eshelby,et al.  The elastic field outside an ellipsoidal inclusion , 1959, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[35]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[36]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[37]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[38]  Active elasticity of gels with contractile cells. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[39]  Nobuyuki Otsu,et al.  ATlreshold Selection Method fromGray-Level Histograms , 1979 .

[40]  D. Weitz,et al.  An active biopolymer network controlled by molecular motors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. , 2006, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[42]  D. Discher,et al.  Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. , 2010, Nature physics.

[43]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cellular and multicellular form and function. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[44]  Y. Benveniste,et al.  A new approach to the application of Mori-Tanaka's theory in composite materials , 1987 .

[45]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[46]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[47]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[48]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading. , 2000, Trends in cell biology.

[49]  Toshio Mura,et al.  Micromechanics of defects in solids , 1982 .