Bridging the educational research‐teaching practice gap

The first paper [ 1 ] in this two‐part miniseries on conceptual understanding discussed expert and novice conceptual knowledge, the multifaceted nature of conceptual understanding, and the cognitive skills essential for constructing it. This second article presents examples of instruments for the assessment and development of five facets of conceptual understanding that require competence in the cognitive skills of mindful memorization, integration, transfer, analogical reasoning, and system thinking. We also argue for the importance of explicitly assessing these facets of conceptual understanding as part of all biochemistry and molecular biology curricula so as to develop expert knowledge in our students.

[1]  M. Klymkowsky,et al.  Bioliteracy and teaching efficacy: what biologists can learn from physicists. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[2]  D. Allen,et al.  Approaches to cell biology teaching: mapping the journey-concept maps as signposts of developing knowledge structures. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[3]  C. Hancock.  Identification and remediation of student difficulties with quantitative genetics. , 2006 .

[4]  Diane J. Grayson,et al.  A four-level framework for identifying and classifying student conceptual and reasoning difficulties , 2001 .

[5]  Ruth Drake,et al.  Teaching for Transfer. , 2001 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Fisher.  Meaningful and Mindful Learning , 2002 .

[7]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  R. Mayer.  Rote Versus Meaningful Learning , 2002 .

[9]  S. Azer.  Assessment in a problem‐based learning course: Twelve tips for constructing multiple choice questions that test students' cognitive skills , 2003 .

[10]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[11]  Michelle Patrick Cook.  Surface and Semantic Processing of Cellular Transport Representations by High School Students with Low and High Prior Knowledge , 2007 .

[12]  G. Bodner.  Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[13]  D. Perkins,et al.  Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon , 1989 .

[14]  Konrad J. Schönborn,et al.  A Model of Factors Determining Students’ Ability to Interpret External Representations in Biochemistry , 2009 .

[15]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument , 1987 .

[16]  M. Sundberg,et al.  Assessing student learning. , 2002, Cell biology education.

[17]  A. Odom,et al.  Development and application of a two‐tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction , 1995 .

[18]  D. Treagust.  Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science , 1988 .

[19]  Michael C. Rodriguez,et al.  A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment , 2002 .

[20]  James J. Watters,et al.  Approaches to Learning by Students in the Biological Sciences: Implications for teaching , 2007 .

[21]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—heretical suggestions , 1998 .

[22]  Commentary: Changing minds with “trick” questions , 2005, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[23]  K. T. Boersma,et al.  Systems Modelling and the Development of Coherent Understanding of Cell Biology , 2008 .

[24]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  Bridging the educational research‐teaching practice gap , 2010, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[25]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Fisher,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition, Organization, and Use in Biology , 1996 .

[27]  J. Novak.  The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct Them , 2004 .

[28]  Julia Khodor,et al.  A hierarchical biology concept framework: a tool for course design. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[29]  Joseph D Novak,et al.  The promise of new ideas and new technology for improving teaching and learning. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[30]  J. Hofmeyr,et al.  Regulating the cellular economy of supply and demand , 2000, FEBS letters.

[31]  M. Gorodetsky,et al.  Generating Connections and Learning in Biology , 1996 .

[32]  Konrad J. Schönborn,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATION ACROSS EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS: EXPERTS' VIEWS AND CHALLENGES FOR LEARNING , 2009 .

[33]  B. Eylon,et al.  Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts , 1983 .

[34]  G. Norman,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection , 2002 .

[35]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning , 2005 .

[36]  R. Duit.  On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[37]  E. Bell.  The future of education in the molecular life sciences , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[38]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  On KΔ , 1986, Discret. Appl. Math..

[39]  D. Perkins,et al.  Teaching for Transfer. , 1988 .

[40]  J. Wandersee,et al.  The two-tier instrument on photosynthesis: What does it diagnose? , 2001 .

[41]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.