Multi-Criteria Method for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources in the Polish Industrial Sector

Rational decision-making requires assessing the advantages and disadvantages of options, including nonmarket effects (such as environmental effects). This also applies to strategic decision-making in the industrial sector to select alternative renewable energy source (RES). Often, a variety of criteria can be used to select a renewable energy source, whereas no ideal family of criteria for renewable energy selection for industry has been defined in the literature. It was concluded that there is a need to support the actions of industrial development based on RES, which will contribute significantly to overcoming the limitations of the negative effect on the environment in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. There is a clear need for a systematic and polyvalent multicriteria approach to planning in industry. Therefore, a method for choosing the preferred renewable source of electricity for industry has been developed, which considers key criteria of RES choice: Expert opinions, the costs of obtaining the energy and maintaining energy installations, and the volume of electricity from RES. This article offers a modified multicriteria selection method based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP) and the technique for preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS), integrated with a qualitative price analysis (ACJ). This new method was tested through a case study on selecting a preferred RES in Polish industrial conditions. The research results indicate that the proposed method of choosing the preferred renewable energy source can be used in industrial enterprises that strive to meet their energy needs in accordance with the principles of social responsibility.

[1]  Dirk Pesch,et al.  Sensor Fusion and State Estimation of IoT Enabled Wind Energy Conversion System , 2019, Sensors.

[2]  Zhen Wu,et al.  Comparison of Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Methods for Urban Sewer Network Plan Selection , 2020, CivilEng.

[3]  Samuel Asumadu-Sarkodie,et al.  A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation , 2016 .

[4]  Jarosław Brodny,et al.  The analysis of similarities between the European Union countries in terms of the level and structure of the emissions of selected gases and air pollutants into the atmosphere , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[5]  F. Chan,et al.  Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach , 2007 .

[6]  G. Halkos,et al.  Reviewing Usage, Potentials, and Limitations of Renewable Energy Sources , 2020, Energies.

[7]  Çiğdem Sofyalioğlu,et al.  Application of Grey Relational Analysis with Fuzzy AHP to FMEA Method , 2012 .

[8]  Zhen Qin,et al.  Characterization of Microbial Community in Daqu by PLFA Method , 2014 .

[9]  A. Wiśniewska,et al.  Resonance of Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in Industrial Enterprises in the Food Industry , 2020 .

[10]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Enabling new mindsets and transformative skills for negotiating and activating climate action: Lessons from UNFCCC conferences of the parties , 2020, Environmental Science & Policy.

[11]  Hassanudin Mohd Thas Thaker,et al.  An Investigation of an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System to Predict the Relationship among Energy Intensity, Globalization, and Financial Development in Major ASEAN Economies , 2020, Energies.

[12]  Renny Pradina Kusumawardani,et al.  The Third Information Systems International Conference Application of Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method for Decision Making in Human Resource Manager Selection Process , 2015 .

[13]  Jun Wu,et al.  Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2007 .

[14]  Aldona Kluczek,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis for simplified evaluation of clean energy technologies , 2019, Production Engineering Archives.

[15]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[16]  K. S. Ravichandran,et al.  A Group Decision Framework for Renewable Energy Source Selection under Interval-Valued Probabilistic linguistic Term Set , 2020 .

[17]  M. Ingaldi,et al.  People’s Attitude to Energy from Hydrogen—From the Point of View of Modern Energy Technologies and Social Responsibility , 2020, Energies.

[18]  Xiuli Liu,et al.  A Grey Neural Network and Input-Output Combined Forecasting Model and Its Application in Primary Energy Related CO2 Emissions Estimation by Sector in China , 2013 .

[19]  Roger K. Blashfield,et al.  Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges , 1978 .

[20]  V. Zhelykh,et al.  Solar collectors integrated into transparent facades , 2020 .

[21]  Mihail Busu,et al.  Analyzing the Impact of the Renewable Energy Sources on Economic Growth at the EU Level Using an ARDL Model , 2020, Mathematics.

[22]  P. Golińska-Dawson,et al.  Sustainability Classification for SMEs from the Remanufacturing Sector , 2015 .

[23]  V. Erokhin,et al.  Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development in a Resource-Abundant Country: Challenges of Wind Power Generation in Kazakhstan , 2018, Sustainability.

[24]  Fabio Hirschhorn,et al.  Reflections on the application of the Delphi method: lessons from a case in public transport research , 2018, International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

[25]  Yasir Ahmed Solangi,et al.  Analyzing Renewable Energy Sources of a Developing Country for Sustainable Development: An Integrated Fuzzy Based-Decision Methodology , 2020 .

[26]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[27]  Chang-cheng Mu,et al.  Effects on Greenhouse Gas (CH4, CO2, N2O) Emissions of Conversion from Over-Mature Forest to Secondary Forest and Korean Pine Plantation in Northeast China , 2019, Forests.

[28]  Laixiang Sun,et al.  Modelling the renewable transition: Scenarios and pathways for a decarbonized future using pymedeas, a new open-source energy systems model , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[29]  A. Pacana,et al.  Discrepancies analysis of casts of diesel engine piston , 2018 .

[30]  D. Griffith,et al.  Simultaneous shipborne measurements of CO2, CH4 and CO and their application to improving greenhouse-gas flux estimates in Australia , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[31]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Ting Chen,et al.  Multistage Decision Framework for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources Based on Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE , 2020, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[33]  N. Khanna,et al.  China’s Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Future Trajectories and Mitigation Options and Potential , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Robert Ulewicz,et al.  Quality management systems in special processes , 2019, Transportation Research Procedia.

[35]  A. Dudek,et al.  The fuzzy TOPSIS method and its implementation in the R programme , 2015 .

[36]  R. Ulewicz,et al.  Studying the Level of Sustainable Energy Development of the European Union Countries and Their Similarity Based on the Economic and Demographic Potential , 2020, Energies.

[37]  Joanna Majchrzak,et al.  The concept of the qualitology and grey system theory application in marketing information quality cognition and assessment , 2019, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  N. Radek,et al.  Laser Treatment of Electro-Spark Coatings Deposited in the Carbon Steel Substrate with using Nanostructured WC-Cu Electrodes , 2012 .

[39]  Monday Sunday Adiaha,et al.  Mitigating Global Greenhouse Gas Emission: The Role of Trees as a Clean Mechanism For CO2 Sequestration , 2020 .

[40]  María Angeles Gil,et al.  Fuzzy vs. Likert Scale in Statistics , 2012, Combining Experimentation and Theory.

[41]  J. Fabianová,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS IN DECISION MAKING OF THE INVESTMENT PROJECT “WIND PARK” , 2016 .

[42]  Aleksandra Łuczak,et al.  Ocena ważności czynników strategicznych w gminie wiejskiej z wykorzystaniem rozmytego analitycznego procesu hierarchicznego , 2012 .

[43]  Hadi Amineh Nataliya Kosach Assessment of Consumers’ Satisfaction with the Automotive Product Quality , 2016 .

[44]  S. Soh,et al.  A decision model for evaluating third-party logistics providers using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2010 .

[45]  L. Breuer,et al.  Simulating Long-Term Development of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Plant Biomass, and Soil Moisture of a Temperate Grassland Ecosystem under Elevated Atmospheric CO2 , 2019 .

[46]  K. A. Nigim,et al.  Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources , 2004 .

[47]  Jarosław Brodny,et al.  Forecasting the Structure of Energy Production from Renewable Energy Sources and Biofuels in Poland , 2020, Energies.

[48]  T. Lipiński Double Modification Of AlSi9Mg Alloy With Boron, Titanium And Strontium , 2015 .

[49]  A. Lee,et al.  An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP on the Discussion of Training Indicators for the Regional Competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition, in the Trade of Joinery , 2020, Sustainability.

[50]  J. Paska,et al.  Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources in Poland as a Part of Commitment to the Polish and EU Energy Policy , 2020, Energies.

[51]  Pradip P. Kalbar,et al.  PyTOPS: A Python based tool for TOPSIS , 2019, SoftwareX.

[52]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[53]  M. Urbański,et al.  Ukraine Energy Sector Management Using Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems , 2020, Energies.

[54]  Michal Kolcun,et al.  IMPACT OF ELECTRICAL POWER LOAD TIME MANAGEMENT AT SIZING AND COST OF HYBRID RENEWABLE POWER SYSTEM , 2017 .

[55]  Andrzej Pacana,et al.  Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria , 2020, Sustainability.

[56]  Eunnyeong Heo,et al.  Selecting sustainable renewable energy source for energy assistance to North Korea , 2011 .

[57]  Andrzej Pacana,et al.  Analysis of the incompatibility of the product with fluorescent method , 2019 .