Do-it-yourself information technology: Role hybridization and the design-use interface

Information technology designers and users are generally treated as interacting yet distinct groups. Although approaches such as participatory design attempt to bring these groups together, such efforts are viewed as temporary and restricted to a specific knowledge domain where users can share key information and insights with designers. The author explores case studies that point to a different situation, role hybridization. Role hybridization focuses on the ability of individuals to shift from one knowledge domain to another, thus allowing for simultaneous membership within two otherwise distinct social worlds. While some studies focus on the ability of designers to act as users, this study focuses on the opposite situation, users who become designers. Interview and participant observation data is used to explore hybrid user–designers in two case studies: frog dissection simulations used in K-12 biology education and human anatomy simulations used in medical education. Hybrid users as designers are one part of a larger design–use interface, illustrating the mutually constructive relationship between the activities of information technology design and use. Users as designers also challenge the traditional power relationship between designers and users, leading to a novel and exciting form of user-centered design. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Rob Kling,et al.  Patterns Of Segmentation And Intersection In The Computing World , 1978 .

[2]  P. Bryan Heidorn,et al.  Complementary user-centered methodologies for information seeking and use: System's design in the Biological Information Browsing Environment (BIBE) , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  J. Ben-David,et al.  Social factors in the origins of a new science: the case of psychology. , 1966, American sociological review.

[4]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Observing users, designing clarity: A case study on the user-centered design of a cross-language information retrieval system , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  R. Kling Synergies and Competition Between Life in Cyberspace and Face-to-Face Communities , 1996 .

[6]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Apprenticing with the customer , 1995, CACM.

[7]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Boundary Objects with Agency: A Method for Studying the Design–Use Interface , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[8]  S. Woolgar Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[9]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Physical spaces, virtual places and social worlds: a study of work in the virtual , 1996, CSCW '96.

[10]  S. Epstein Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge , 1998 .

[11]  A. Bruni The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[12]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Ethnography and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[13]  Betsy Van der Veer Martens,et al.  Do citation systems represent theories of truth? , 2001, Inf. Res..

[14]  Lisa Covi,et al.  Material mastery: how university researchers use digital libraries for scholarly communication , 1996 .

[15]  Ron Eglash,et al.  Appropriating Technology: Vernacular Science And Social Power , 2004 .

[16]  Jamshid Beheshti,et al.  Design criteria for children's Web portals: The users speak out , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Michelle M. Kazmer Disengagement From Intrinsically Transient Social Worlds: The Case of a Distance Learning Community , 2002 .

[18]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Specifying dynamic support for collaborative work within WORLDS , 1995, COCS '95.

[19]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science , 1999 .

[21]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[22]  P. Thomas The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces , 1995 .

[23]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Shaping technology across social worlds: groupware adoption in a distributed organization , 2003, GROUP.

[24]  F. B. Orlans In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation , 1993 .

[25]  Doug Tudhope,et al.  Reconfiguring the User: , 2000 .

[26]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization , 1997 .

[27]  Hong Xie,et al.  State digital library usability: Contributing organizational factors , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[29]  D. Haraway Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[30]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  People and computers : the impacts of computing on end users in organizations , 1985 .

[31]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  The user-subjective approach to personal information management systems , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Juggling Multiple Social Worlds , 2001 .

[33]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Working relations of technology production and use , 1993, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[34]  Rob Kling,et al.  Electronic Journals and Legitimate Media in the Systems of Scholarly Communication , 1995, Inf. Soc..

[35]  Gerald Benoît,et al.  Properties-based retrieval and user decision states: User control and behavior modeling , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Yan Ma,et al.  A design analysis model for developing world wide web sites , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[38]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[39]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[40]  Shu Ching Yang An interpretive and situated approach to an evaluation of Perseus digital libraries , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  K. Fleischmann,et al.  Frog and Cyberfrog are Friends: Dissection Simulation and Animal Advocacy , 2003 .