Software-Defined Decentralized Domestic Wastewater Treatment: 1st Milestone

Water scarcity has been intensified globally due to the rapid growth of economic and population. Wastewater treatment and recycling is one of the most feasible strategies for meeting the ever-increasing water usage. However, conventional centralized wastewater treatment plants are being stretched to their limits with the emerging urban structures. To mitigate this situation, this paper proposes a decentralized treatment solution for domestic wastewater leveraging the recent advancements in instrumentation, automation, and information technologies. In particular, a 60-ton adjustable secondary wastewater treatment facility has been designed as a foundation, upon which in-situ monitoring, software-centric automation system, and industrial edge-cloud computing platform have been deployed to form a holistic solution. The resultant facility has been consecutively and successfully operating onsite to date.

[1]  Juan Xu,et al.  A pilot-scale three-dimensional electrochemical reactor combined with anaerobic-anoxic-oxic system for advanced treatment of coking wastewater. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  E. Dacewicz Waste assessment decision support systems used for domestic sewage treatment , 2019, Journal of Water Process Engineering.

[3]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Data-driven performance analyses of wastewater treatment plants: A review. , 2019, Water research.

[4]  Yolanda Picó,et al.  Wastewater-based epidemiology: current status and future prospects , 2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health.

[5]  W. Rauch,et al.  Sweating the assets - The role of instrumentation, control and automation in urban water systems. , 2019, Water research.

[6]  Jason P. Jue,et al.  All One Needs to Know about Fog Computing and Related Edge Computing Paradigms , 2019 .

[7]  N. Crosbie,et al.  Wastewater-based epidemiology biomarkers: Past, present and future , 2018, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

[8]  Christian G. Daughton,et al.  Monitoring wastewater for assessing community health: Sewage Chemical-Information Mining (SCIM) , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Segev Wasserkrug,et al.  IBM Cognitive Technology Helps Aqualia to Reduce Costs and Save Resources in Wastewater Treatment , 2017, Interfaces.

[10]  Valeriy Vyatkin,et al.  Software-defined automation and control a preliminary study , 2017, IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[11]  Xin Zhou,et al.  Four-stage biofilm anaerobic–anoxic–oxic–oxic system for strengthening the biological treatment of coking wastewater: COD removal behaviors and biokinetic modeling , 2017 .

[12]  P. Thai,et al.  Impact of in-Sewer Degradation of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) Population Markers on a Population Model. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Jason M. White,et al.  National Wastewater Drug Monitoring Program - Report 1 , 2017 .

[14]  Juan M. Lema,et al.  Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement , 2016 .

[15]  H H Ngo,et al.  Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in China. , 2016, Environment international.

[16]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Four billion people facing severe water scarcity , 2016, Science Advances.

[17]  Rui Li,et al.  Software Defined Anything—From Software-Defined Hardware to Software Defined Anything , 2016 .

[18]  Jun Wu,et al.  Influence of sewage treatment on China׳s energy consumption and economy and its performances , 2015 .

[19]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Smart water grid: the future water management platform , 2015 .

[20]  John Conway The Industrial Internet of Things : An Evolution to a Smart Manufacturing Enterprise Executive summary , 2015 .

[21]  Evaluation of Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic (A2/O) and Reverse A2/O Processes in Biological Nutrient Removal , 2014, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[22]  Francesco Corona,et al.  Data-derived soft-sensors for biological wastewater treatment plants: An overview , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Gustaf Olsson,et al.  Water and Energy: Threats and Opportunities , 2012 .

[24]  M Mulas,et al.  Nitrate estimation in the denitrifying post-filtration unit of a municipal wastewater treatment plant: the Viikinmäki case. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[25]  Leiv Rieger,et al.  Improving Nutrient Removal While Reducing Energy Use at Three Swiss WWTPs Using Advanced Control , 2012, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[26]  Feng Liu,et al.  A Primer on Energy Efficiency for Municipal Water and Wastewater Utilities , 2012 .

[27]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[28]  A. Tabeau,et al.  OECD environmental outlook to 2050 : the consequences of inaction , 2012 .

[29]  O. Nowak,et al.  Examples of energy self-sufficient municipal nutrient removal plants. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants , 2014 .

[31]  Francesc Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: A DEA approach , 2009 .

[32]  V. Vyatkin,et al.  Now That's Smart! , 2007, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[33]  D Lumley,et al.  On-line instrument confirmation: how can we check that our instruments are working? , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  Peter A. Wilderer,et al.  Decentralized and centralized wastewater management: a challenge for technology developers , 2000 .

[35]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.