Virtual Intimacy, this little something between us: A study about Human perception of intimate behaviors in Embodied Conversational Agents

Building a long-term relationship between human and virtual agent remains a challenge. This paper explores the influence of intimate behavioral cues and the impact of different interaction modalities (voice, text, gesture) on our perception of intimacy. We built a virtual Tourism Information (TI) counselor capable of intimate behaviors based on grounded theories of intimacy developed in psychology. We studied how external observers perceive the social behaviors of the agent during its interactions with a human tourist. Our originality is to evaluate the perception of social skills across the interaction. Our results show that nonverbal behaviors of the virtual agent reinforces the impact of verbal cues on human perception on virtual intimacy. Findings also suggest that textual medium of communication has a negative impact on the perception of virtual intimacy, whatever the level of animation and intimacy exhibited by the TI counselor.

[1]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[2]  T. Morton.  Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. , 1978 .

[3]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[4]  Russell Beale,et al.  Affective interaction: How emotional agents affect users , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Karen J. Prager.  The Psychology of Intimacy , 1995 .

[6]  Ning Tan,et al.  Front View vs. Side View of Facial and Postural Expressions of Emotions in a Virtual Character , 2011, Trans. Edutainment.

[7]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Construct validation of a triangular love scale , 1997 .

[8]  Brian Ravenet,et al.  Vers des Agents Conversationnels Animés dotés d'émotions et d'attitudes sociales , 2014 .

[9]  H. Reis,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process. , 1988 .

[10]  Randall W. Hill,et al.  Toward Virtual Humans , 2006, AI Mag..

[11]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. , 2005, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[12]  Karen J. Prager.  Intimacy in personal relationships. , 2000 .

[13]  D. Mcgregor,et al.  The Human Side of Enterprise , 1960 .

[14]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[15]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Engagement vs. Deceit: Virtual Humans with Human Autobiographies , 2009, IVA.

[16]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[17]  Tibert Verhagen,et al.  Virtual Customer Service Agents: Using Social Presence and Personalization to Shape Online Service Encounters , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Ran Zhao,et al.  Towards a Dyadic Computational Model of Rapport Management for Human-Virtual Agent Interaction , 2014, IVA.

[19]  J. Cappella.  On Defining Conversational Coordination and Rapport , 1990 .

[20]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[21]  D. Mcgregor.  The Human Side of Enterprise , 1960 .

[22]  Angela H. Smith,et al.  The Development of the Functional Analytic Psychotherapy Intimacy Scale , 2014 .

[23]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Social snacking with a virtual agent - On the interrelation of need to belong and effects of social responsiveness when interacting with artificial entities , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[25]  Ran Zhao,et al.  Socially-Aware Animated Intelligent Personal Assistant Agent , 2016, SIGDIAL Conference.

[26]  Linda Tickle-Degnen,et al.  Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. , 1987 .

[27]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates , 1990 .

[28]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.