Analysis on the current status of targeted drug delivery to tumors.

Targeted drug delivery to tumor sites is one of the ultimate goals in drug delivery. Recent progress in nanoparticle engineering has certainly improved drug targeting, but the results are not as good as expected. This is largely due to the fact that nanoparticles, regardless of how advanced they are, find the target as a result of blood circulation, like the conventional drug delivery systems do. Currently, the nanoparticle-based drug delivery to the target tumor tissues is based on wrong assumptions that most of the nanoparticles, either PEGylated or not, reach the target by the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect. Studies have shown that so-called targeting moieties, i.e., antibodies or ligands, on the nanoparticle surface do not really improve delivery to target tumors. Targeted drug delivery to tumor sites is associated with highly complex biological, mechanical, chemical and transport phenomena, of which characteristics vary spatiotemporally. Yet, most of the efforts have been focused on design and surface manipulation of the drug carrying nanoparticles with relatively little attention to other aspects. This article examines the current misunderstandings and the main difficulties in targeted drug delivery.

[1]  I. Kwon,et al.  Spatially mineralized self-assembled polymeric nanocarriers with enhanced robustness and controlled drug-releasing property. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[2]  P. Low,et al.  Ligand Binding and Kinetics of Folate Receptor Recycling in Vivo: Impact on Receptor-Mediated Drug Delivery , 2004, Molecular Pharmacology.

[3]  P. Swaan,et al.  Endocytic mechanisms for targeted drug delivery. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[4]  Two‐step radio‐immunotargeting of renal‐cell carcinoma xenografts in nude mice with anti‐renal‐cell‐carcinoma X anti‐DTPA bispecific monoclonal antibodies , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[5]  Felix Kratz,et al.  Impact of albumin on drug delivery--new applications on the horizon. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[6]  M. D’Incalci,et al.  Contemporary pre-clinical development of anticancer agents--what are the optimal preclinical models? , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[7]  R. Gurny,et al.  Benefit of anti-HER2-coated paclitaxel-loaded immuno-nanoparticles in the treatment of disseminated ovarian cancer: Therapeutic efficacy and biodistribution in mice. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[8]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. III. Role of binding and metabolism. , 1991 .

[9]  T. Ishida,et al.  Spleen plays an important role in the induction of accelerated blood clearance of PEGylated liposomes. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[10]  Ahmed O Elzoghby,et al.  Albumin-based nanoparticles as potential controlled release drug delivery systems. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[11]  R. Jain,et al.  Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. , 2000, Cancer research.

[12]  N. Hijnen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of high intensity focused ultrasound mediated drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes: an in vivo proof-of-concept study. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[13]  L. Johansson,et al.  Lowering of tumor interstitial fluid pressure specifically augments efficacy of chemotherapy , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  Allan S. Hoffman,et al.  The origins and evolution of "controlled" drug delivery systems. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[15]  C. Xiong,et al.  Receptor-mediated transcytosis: a mechanism for active extravascular transport of nanoparticles in solid tumors. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[16]  Ick Chan Kwon,et al.  Tumor accumulation and antitumor efficacy of docetaxel-loaded core-shell-corona micelles with shell-specific redox-responsive cross-links. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[17]  R. Reed,et al.  Lowering of tumoral interstitial fluid pressure by prostaglandin E1 is paralleled by an increased uptake of 51Cr‐EDTA , 2000, International journal of cancer.

[18]  Saroja Ramanujan,et al.  Diffusion and convection in collagen gels: implications for transport in the tumor interstitium. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Kort Travis,et al.  Controlled assembly of biodegradable plasmonic nanoclusters for near-infrared imaging and therapeutic applications. , 2010, ACS nano.

[20]  E. Cukierman,et al.  The benefits and challenges associated with the use of drug delivery systems in cancer therapy. , 2010, Biochemical pharmacology.

[21]  Kinam Park To PEGylate or not to PEGylate, that is not the question. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[22]  A. Wunder,et al.  Plasma protein (albumin) catabolism by the tumor itself--implications for tumor metabolism and the genesis of cachexia. , 1997, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[23]  You Han Bae,et al.  Doxorubicin loaded pH-sensitive polymeric micelles for reversal of resistant MCF-7 tumor. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[24]  P. Seglen,et al.  Differences between fluid-phase endocytosis (pinocytosis) and receptor-mediated endocytosis in isolated rat hepatocytes. , 1997, European journal of cell biology.

[25]  Felix Kratz,et al.  Clinical impact of serum proteins on drug delivery. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[26]  Kinam Park,et al.  Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[27]  Alexander T Florence,et al.  Pharmaceutical nanotechnology: more than size. Ten topics for research. , 2007, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[28]  H. Maeda,et al.  A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. , 1986, Cancer research.

[29]  I. Tannock,et al.  The penetration of anticancer drugs through tumor tissue as a function of cellular adhesion and packing density of tumor cells. , 2006, Cancer research.

[30]  Neetu Singh,et al.  Nanoparticles that communicate in vivo to amplify tumour targeting. , 2011, Nature materials.

[31]  R. Jain,et al.  Microvascular permeability and interstitial penetration of sterically stabilized (stealth) liposomes in a human tumor xenograft. , 1994, Cancer research.

[32]  T. M. Chu,et al.  Relationship between antigen density and immunotherapeutic response elicited by monoclonal antibodies against solid tumors. , 1984, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  Etienne Weiss,et al.  Therapeutic antibodies: successes, limitations and hopes for the future , 2009, British journal of pharmacology.

[34]  S. Piecuch Albumin , 1965, Critical care medicine.

[35]  Brian Seed,et al.  Dynamic imaging of collagen and its modulation in tumors in vivo using second-harmonic generation , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[36]  Tae Gwan Park,et al.  Folate receptor targeted biodegradable polymeric doxorubicin micelles. , 2004, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[37]  Felix Kratz,et al.  Albumin as a drug carrier: design of prodrugs, drug conjugates and nanoparticles. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[38]  Jun Fang,et al.  The EPR effect: Unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. , 2011, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[39]  N. Soni,et al.  Albumin. Where are we now , 2004 .

[40]  Kinam Park Nanotechnology: What it can do for drug delivery. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[41]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. II. Role of heterogeneous perfusion and lymphatics. , 1990, Microvascular research.

[42]  J. Proost,et al.  PEGylation improves pharmacokinetic profile, liver uptake and efficacy of Interferon gamma in liver fibrosis. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[43]  Pakatip Ruenraroengsak,et al.  Nanosystem drug targeting: Facing up to complex realities. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[44]  R. B. Campbell,et al.  Role of tumor–host interactions in interstitial diffusion of macromolecules: Cranial vs. subcutaneous tumors , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  R K Jain,et al.  Taxane-induced apoptosis decompresses blood vessels and lowers interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors: clinical implications. , 1999, Cancer research.

[46]  Nicolas Bertrand,et al.  The journey of a drug-carrier in the body: an anatomo-physiological perspective. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[47]  C. Allen,et al.  Block copolymer micelles for delivery of cancer therapy: transport at the whole body, tissue and cellular levels. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[48]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  Targeting of drugs and nanoparticles to tumors , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  Petra Krystek,et al.  Particle size-dependent organ distribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[50]  U. Nielsen,et al.  Antibody targeting of long-circulating lipidic nanoparticles does not increase tumor localization but does increase internalization in animal models. , 2006, Cancer research.

[51]  R. B. Campbell,et al.  Two-photon fluorescence correlation microscopy reveals the two-phase nature of transport in tumors , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[52]  R. Jain,et al.  Comparison of IgG diffusion and extracellular matrix composition in rhabdomyosarcomas grown in mice versus in vitro as spheroids reveals the role of host stromal cells , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[53]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. , 1989, Microvascular research.

[54]  W. Hennink,et al.  Comparison of five different targeting ligands to enhance accumulation of liposomes into the brain. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[55]  Kinam Park Albumin: a versatile carrier for drug delivery. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[56]  P. Caliceti,et al.  Doxorubicin coupled to lactosaminated albumin: effect of heterogeneity in drug load on conjugate disposition and hepatocellular carcinoma uptake in rats. , 2008, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[57]  S. Kagatani,et al.  In vivo fate of folate-BSA in non-tumor- and tumor-bearing mice. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[58]  V. Trezza,et al.  Human serum albumin: from bench to bedside. , 2012, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[59]  R K Jain,et al.  Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. , 1987, Cancer research.