Automatic aftereffects in two-choice reaction time: a mathematical representation of some concepts.

A mathematical model is developed to describe sequential effects in two-choice reaction time experiments with a short response-stimulus interval. Evidence is briefly discussed that in conditions with short response-stimulus intervals, automatic aftereffects dominate sequential effects, and the influence of subjective expectancy can be neglected. In these conditions the model premises three components of automatic aftereffects--facilitation, inhibition, and noise, with a common decay factor. Influence of response-stimulus interval and practice on sequential effects are examined and related to parameter changes in the proposed single-decay model. The decrease of automatic aftereffects with increasing response-stimulus interval is primarily ascribed to an increasing decay factor. The parameter representation of the model also clarifies the issue of the disappearance of automatic aftereffects with practice. It shows a gradual fading of inhibition in the initial stages of practice, together with a slower decrease of the facilitation effect. The single-decay model provides a satisfactory explanation for the processes involved in compatible two-choice reaction time with short response-stimulus interval.

[1]  H. Woodrow.  The measurement of attention , 1914 .

[2]  M. Jarvik,et al.  Probability learning and a negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of alternative symbols. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Hyman.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  P. Bertelson.  Sequential Redundancy and Speed in a Serial Two-Choice Responding Task , 1961 .

[5]  P. Bertelson.  S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task , 1963 .

[6]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Serial Choice Reaction-time as a Function of Response versus Signal-and-Response Repetition , 1965, Nature.

[7]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task as a function of response-signal time interval , 1966 .

[8]  J. Williams,et al.  Sequential effects in disjunctive reaction time: implications for decision models. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  A Note on Davis's Refutation of the Expectancy Hypothesis , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  D. Hale.  Sequential Effects in a Two-Choice Serial Reaction Task , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[12]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[13]  David Hale,et al.  The relation of correct and error responses in a serial choice reaction task , 1968 .

[14]  Choice reaction times with equally and unequally probable alternatives. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  P M Rabbitt,et al.  Repetition Effects and Signal Classification Strategies in Serial Choice-Response Tasks , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  M C Smith,et al.  Repetition effect and short-term memory. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  D. Hale.  Repetition and probability effects in a serial choice reaction task , 1969 .

[18]  S. Keele.  Repetition effect: A memory-dependent process. , 1969 .

[19]  R. Remington.  Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  W. Chase,et al.  Sequential effects in choice reaction time. , 1969 .

[21]  D. Bindra,et al.  Common features of the “repetition” and “same-different” effects in reaction time experiments , 1970 .

[22]  W. Eichelman,et al.  Stimulus and response repetition effects for naming letters at two response-stimulus intervals , 1970 .

[23]  Robert J. Remington,et al.  Analysis of Sequential Effects for a Four-Choice Reaction Time Experiment. , 1971 .

[24]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Repetition effect as a function of event uncertainty, response-stimulus interval, and rank order of the event , 1972 .

[25]  G. Stone,et al.  Sequential effects in two- and four-choice tasks , 1972 .

[26]  N. Kirby,et al.  Sequential effects of serial reaction time. , 1972 .

[27]  N. Kirby.  Sequential effects in serial reaction time / [by] Neil H. Kirby , 1973 .

[28]  S W Keele,et al.  Processing demands of sequential information , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[29]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[30]  N. Kirby.  Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy? , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  The Changing Pattern of Perceptual Analytic Strategies and Response Selection with Practice in a Two-Choice Reaction time task , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  L. Boer,et al.  Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: Subjective expectancy and automatic after- effect at short response-stimulus intervals☆ , 1980 .

[33]  E. Soetens,et al.  Expectancy or Automatic Facilitation? Separating Sequential Effects in Two-Choice Reaction Time , 1985 .