Heterogeneous reactor modeling for simulation of catalytic oxidation and steam reforming of methane

Abstract An autothermal, dual catalyst, fixed-bed reaction system proposed for hydrogen production from methane is mathematically investigated using different catalyst bed configurations and feed ratios. Consecutive placement or physical mixture of the oxidation and reforming catalysts, Pt/ δ –Al 2 O 3 and Ni/MgO–Al 2 O 3 , respectively, are the two configurations of interest. Reactor operation at different feed ratios is analyzed for both catalyst bed configurations on laboratory scale and industrial scale via a series of simulations by using one-dimensional heterogeneous fixed-bed reactor model. The type of heterogeneous components implemented into the model is decided by checking related criteria. Hydrogen production is predicted to be higher when the catalysts are in a physically mixed state as well as at low methane-to-oxygen and high steam-to-methane ratios, which are in agreement with the experimental results reported for a bench scale integral reactor. The optimum operating conditions for obtaining maximum hydrogen production are also investigated.

[1]  Edward Furimsky,et al.  Selection of catalysts and reactors for hydroprocessing , 1998 .

[2]  Miroslaw L. Wyszynski,et al.  On-board generation of hydrogen-rich gaseous fuels—a review , 1994 .

[3]  D. Trimm,et al.  Alternative catalyst bed configurations for the autothermic conversion of methane to hydrogen , 1996 .

[4]  David L. Trimm,et al.  The design and testing of an autothermal reactor for the conversion of light hydrocarbons to hydrogen I. The kinetics of the catalytic oxidation of light hydrocarbons , 1996 .

[5]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[6]  H. S. Fogler,et al.  Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1986 .

[7]  G. G. Kuvshinov,et al.  Kinetics of carbon formation from CH4-H2 mixtures over a nickel containing catalyst , 1998 .

[8]  L. Schmidt,et al.  Production of Syngas by Direct Catalytic Oxidation of Methane , 1993, Science.

[9]  J. Fierro,et al.  New catalytic routes for syngas and hydrogen production , 1996 .

[10]  Gilbert F. Froment,et al.  Simulation of the catalytic partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas , 1996 .

[11]  H. Johnstone,et al.  Heat and mass transfer in packed beds , 1955 .

[12]  G. Bond,et al.  Catalysis, science and technology , 1983 .

[13]  M. A. Rosen,et al.  Thermodynamic investigation of hydrogen production by steam-methane reforming , 1991 .

[14]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming: II. Diffusional limitations and reactor simulation , 1989 .

[15]  J. Armor,et al.  The multiple roles for catalysis in the production of H2 , 1999 .

[16]  D. L Trimm,et al.  Catalysts for the control of coking during steam reforming , 1999 .