Reducing Crowding by Weakening Inhibitory Lateral Interactions in the Periphery with Perceptual Learning

We investigated whether lateral masking in the near-periphery, due to inhibitory lateral interactions at an early level of central visual processing, could be weakened by perceptual learning and whether learning transferred to an untrained, higher-level lateral masking known as crowding. The trained task was contrast detection of a Gabor target presented in the near periphery (4°) in the presence of co-oriented and co-aligned high contrast Gabor flankers, which featured different target-to-flankers separations along the vertical axis that varied from 2λ to 8λ. We found both suppressive and facilitatory lateral interactions at target-to-flankers distances (2λ - 4λ and 8λ, respectively) that were larger than those found in the fovea. Training reduces suppression but does not increase facilitation. Most importantly, we found that learning reduces crowding and improves contrast sensitivity, but has no effect on visual acuity (VA). These results suggest a different pattern of connectivity in the periphery with respect to the fovea as well as a different modulation of this connectivity via perceptual learning that not only reduces low-level lateral masking but also reduces crowding. These results have important implications for the rehabilitation of low-vision patients who must use peripheral vision to perform tasks, such as reading and refined figure-ground segmentation, which normal sighted subjects perform in the fovea.

[1]  R F Hess,et al.  Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[4]  C Wehrhahn,et al.  Contextual influence on orientation discrimination of humans and responses of neurons in V1 of alert monkeys. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Temporal and spatial interference with vernier acuity , 1975, Vision Research.

[6]  B. Dosher,et al.  External Noise Distinguishes Mechanisms of Attention , 2005 .

[7]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[8]  U Polat,et al.  Spatial interactions in human vision: from near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The modular organization of projections from areas V1 and V2 to areas V4 and TEO in macaques , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The Neural Basis of Perceptual Learning , 2001, Neuron.

[13]  C. Li,et al.  Extensive integration field beyond the classical receptive field of cat's striate cortical neurons--classification and tuning properties. , 1994, Vision research.

[14]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[15]  J. Bullier,et al.  Reaching beyond the classical receptive field of V1 neurons: horizontal or feedback axons? , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[16]  D. Tanné,et al.  Perceptual learning: learning to see , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Interference with stereoscopic acuity: Spatial, temporal, and disparity tuning , 1978, Vision Research.

[18]  Brad C. Motter Crowding and object integration within the receptive field of V4 neurons , 2010 .

[19]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Uri Polat,et al.  Making perceptual learning practical to improve visual functions , 2009, Vision Research.

[21]  S. McKee,et al.  Crowding and surround suppression: not to be confused. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[22]  Michael Belkin,et al.  Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[24]  D. Hubel,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF CELLS IN STRIATE CORTEX OF VERY YOUNG, VISUALLY INEXPERIENCED KITTENS. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G Westheimer,et al.  Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Lin Yang,et al.  Perceptual Learning Increases the Strength of the Earliest Signals in Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Eccentricity effects on lateral interactions , 2005, Vision Research.

[28]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Denis G Pelli,et al.  Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[30]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[31]  Robin D. Thomas,et al.  Evidence for criterion shifts in visual perceptual learning: Data and implications , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  D. Sagi,et al.  Isolating Excitatory and Inhibitory Nonlinear Spatial Interactions Involved in Contrast Detection * * Part of this paper was presented at the 17th ECVP conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (September 1994). , 1996, Vision Research.

[34]  M. Sur,et al.  Subthreshold facilitation and suppression in primary visual cortex revealed by intrinsic signal imaging. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Tan,et al.  Efficacy of neural vision therapy to enhance contrast sensitivity function and visual acuity in low myopia , 2008, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

[36]  U. Polat,et al.  Neurophysiological Evidence for Contrast Dependent Long-range Facilitation and Suppression in the Human Visual Cortex , 1996, Vision Research.

[37]  Christian Wehrhahn,et al.  Neuronal responses from beyond the classic receptive field in V1 of alert monkeys , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[39]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[40]  D. Sagi,et al.  Recurrent networks in human visual cortex: psychophysical evidence. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[41]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[42]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[44]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[45]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[46]  S. Klein,et al.  Rule-Based Learning Explains Visual Perceptual Learning and Its Specificity and Transfer , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Roger W Li,et al.  Extended perceptual learning results in substantial recovery of positional acuity and visual acuity in juvenile amblyopia. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[48]  U Polat,et al.  Facilitation and suppression of single striate-cell activity by spatially discrete pattern stimuli presented beyond the receptive field , 2001, Visual Neuroscience.

[49]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[50]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[51]  S. Klein,et al.  Complete Transfer of Perceptual Learning across Retinal Locations Enabled by Double Training , 2008, Current Biology.

[52]  J. Nelson,et al.  Intracortical facilitation among co-oriented, co-axially aligned simple cells in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  Enhanced sensitivity for peripherally‐presented collinearly‐aligned stimulus elements: contour detection or spatial summation? , 2001, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[54]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Human Ocular Dominance Columns as Revealed by High-Field Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Neuron.

[55]  C. Koch,et al.  Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination—psychophysics and modeling , 2001, Vision Research.

[56]  S P McKee,et al.  Interference with line-orientation sensitivity. , 1976, Journal of the Optical Society of America.