Influence of Gene Interaction on Complex Trait Variation with Multilocus Models

Although research effort is being expended into determining the importance of epistasis and epistatic variance for complex traits, there is considerable controversy about their importance. Here we undertake an analysis for quantitative traits utilizing a range of multilocus quantitative genetic models and gene frequency distributions, focusing on the potential magnitude of the epistatic variance. All the epistatic terms involving a particular locus appear in its average effect, with the number of two-locus interaction terms increasing in proportion to the square of the number of loci and that of third order as the cube and so on. Hence multilocus epistasis makes substantial contributions to the additive variance and does not, per se, lead to large increases in the nonadditive part of the genotypic variance. Even though this proportion can be high where epistasis is antagonistic to direct effects, it reduces with multiple loci. As the magnitude of the epistatic variance depends critically on the heterozygosity, for models where frequencies are widely dispersed, such as for selectively neutral mutations, contributions of epistatic variance are always small. Epistasis may be important in understanding the genetic architecture, for example, of function or human disease, but that does not imply that loci exhibiting it will contribute much genetic variance. Overall we conclude that theoretical predictions and experimental observations of low amounts of epistatic variance in outbred populations are concordant. It is not a likely source of missing heritability, for example, or major influence on predictions of rates of evolution.

[1]  K. Kojima Effects of dominance and size of population on response to mass selection , 1961 .

[2]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[3]  P. Keightley Models of quantitative variation of flux in metabolic pathways. , 1989, Genetics.

[4]  C. Cockerham,et al.  An Extension of the Concept of Partitioning Hereditary Variance for Analysis of Covariances among Relatives When Epistasis Is Present. , 1954, Genetics.

[5]  E. Lander,et al.  The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Data and Theory Point to Mainly Additive Genetic Variance for Complex Traits , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[7]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[8]  B. Griffing Theoretical consequences of truncation selection based on the individual phenotype. , 1960 .

[9]  O. Kempthorne,et al.  The correlation between relatives in a random mating population , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[10]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Genetic interactions affecting human gene expression identified by variance association mapping , 2014, eLife.

[11]  P. Visscher,et al.  Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder , 2009, Nature.

[12]  M. Kimura Attainment of Quasi Linkage Equilibrium When Gene Frequencies Are Changing by Natural Selection. , 1965, Genetics.

[13]  J. Crow On epistasis: why it is unimportant in polygenic directional selection , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. , 1995, Genetics.

[15]  Judy H. Cho,et al.  Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases , 2009, Nature.

[16]  T. F. Hansen WHY EPISTASIS IS IMPORTANT FOR SELECTION AND ADAPTATION , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  S. Safe,et al.  Toxicology of environmental estrogens. , 2001, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[18]  M. Lopes,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block structure in six commercial pig lines. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[19]  Joseph E. Powell,et al.  Detection and replication of epistasis influencing transcription in humans , 2014, Nature.

[20]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  T. Nagylaki The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. , 1993, Genetics.

[22]  W. G. Hill,et al.  THE ACTION OF STABILIZING SELECTION, MUTATION, AND DRIFT ON EPISTATIC QUANTITATIVE TRAITS , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  M. Goddard,et al.  Linkage Disequilibrium and Persistence of Phase in Holstein–Friesian, Jersey and Angus Cattle , 2008, Genetics.

[24]  S. Wright Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[25]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[26]  Ronald M. Nelson,et al.  A century after Fisher: time for a new paradigm in quantitative genetics. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[27]  M. Bulmer The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics , 1981 .

[28]  Mats E. Pettersson,et al.  Replication and Explorations of High-Order Epistasis Using a Large Advanced Intercross Line Pedigree , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[29]  T. Mackay Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene–gene interactions , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[31]  Ayellet V. Segrè,et al.  Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height , 2010, Nature.

[32]  M. Lynch,et al.  Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 1996 .

[33]  R. Fisher XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[34]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Finding the sources of missing heritability in a yeast cross , 2012, Nature.

[35]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Elements of Evolutionary Genetics , 2010 .

[36]  J. Dudley,et al.  100 Generations of Selection for Oil and Protein in Corn , 2010 .

[37]  K. Kojima ROLE OF EPISTASIS AND OVERDOMINANCE IN STABILITY OF EQUILIBRIA WITH SELECTION. , 1959, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Robertson A theory of limits in artificial selection , 1960, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[39]  L. Penrose,et al.  THE CORRELATION BETWEEN RELATIVES ON THE SUPPOSITION OF MENDELIAN INHERITANCE , 2022 .

[40]  C. Haley,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Epistasis and the Missing Heritability , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[41]  P. Phillips Epistasis — the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[42]  E. Dempster,et al.  Heritability of Threshold Characters. , 1950, Genetics.

[43]  Assumptions and Properties of Limiting Pathway Models for Analysis of Epistasis in Complex Traits , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[45]  R. Gibbs,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Epistasis dominates the genetic architecture of Drosophila quantitative traits , 2012 .

[46]  Chris S. Haley,et al.  Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.