Healthcare Access Inequity within a Social Health Insurance Setting: A Risk Faced by Indonesia’s Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) Program

This paper is a literature review laying out empirical evidence of healthcare access inequity within an implementation of social health insurance (SHI) programs. The research question of this paper is: in what way, and how, inequity in healthcare access potentially happens, even if a type of SHI covers the whole, or most, of a society. This paper is mainly motivated by the implementation of Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN), an SHI program in Indonesia. Even though the program aims to create better equity in healthcare access, the existing health system and the program’s design may prevent the achievement of this goal. By laying out evidence on how healthcare access inequity in other countries remains within an SHI mechanism, this paper illuminates that JKN may face the same risk. In reviewing the papers, this study applied Goddard and Smith’s (2001) concept of healthcare access inequity in the area of availability, quality, cost, and information. The findings suggest that healthcare access inequity could happen despite the implementation of an SHI program. Four types of circumstances that might have led to healthcare access inequity include geographical disparities of health facilities; adequacy of insurance program’s reimbursement and healthcare providers’ financial motive; healthcare providers’ prejudices toward patients; and unequal personal advantages of health treatment seekers. When applied to the context of JKN implementation in Indonesia, the risks of healthcare access inequity are imminent, mostly due to the uneven concentration of health facilities, the program’s segmented tariff rates, and the socioeconomic diversity among JKN members. The findings imply that JKN members might be at risk of healthcare access inequity. While the risks are plausible, this study is limited to predicting the potential inequity within JKN, mirroring from the empirical evidence. This study signifies the need for further empirical research on this area, which will potentially inform policymakers to improve the program.

[1]  J. Cylus,et al.  An analysis of perceived access to health care in Europe: How universal is universal coverage? , 2015, Health policy.

[2]  B. Murti,et al.  Perbedaan Kualitas Pelayanan Berdasarkan Waktu Tunggu Serta Rasio Rujukan Pasien Dokter keluarga , 2015 .

[3]  M. De Allegri,et al.  Gaps in universal health coverage in Malawi: A qualitative study in rural communities , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[4]  I. Vargas,et al.  Barriers in access to healthcare in countries with different health systems. A cross-sectional study in municipalities of central Colombia and north-eastern Brazil. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[5]  M. Dauvrin.  Socioeconomic Disparities in Health Care , 2014 .

[6]  Meliyanni Johar,et al.  Discrimination in a universal health system: explaining socioeconomic waiting time gaps. , 2013, Journal of health economics.

[7]  J. Bensing,et al.  The impact of financial incentives on physician empathy: a study from the perspective of patients with private and statutory health insurance. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[8]  Mariam Ally,et al.  .‫املقالة‬ ‫لهذه‬ ‫الكامل‬ ‫النص‬ ‫نهاية‬ ‫يف‬ ‫الخالصة‬ ‫لهذه‬ ‫العربية‬ ‫الرتجمة‬ beyond Fragmentation and towards Universal Coverage: Insights from Ghana, South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania , 2022 .

[9]  A. Hall,et al.  Expanding the Definition of Access: It Isn't Just About Health Insurance , 2008, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[10]  R. Schuster,et al.  With or without intent: How racial disparities prevent effective implementation of care , 2008, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.

[11]  Richard L Street,et al.  Physicians' communication and perceptions of patients: is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor? , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[12]  P. Veugelers,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in health care use: Does universal coverage reduce inequalities in health? , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[13]  S. Berman,et al.  Factors that influence the willingness of private primary care pediatricians to accept more Medicaid patients. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[14]  M. Goddard,et al.  Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[15]  W. McIsaac,et al.  Socio-economic status and the utilisation of physicians' services: results from the Canadian National Population Health Survey. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[16]  M. van Ryn,et al.  The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[17]  A. Wagstaff,et al.  Chapter 34 Equity in health care finance and delivery , 2000 .

[18]  L. Weiner,et al.  Expanding the Definition , 1995 .

[19]  P. Baldasare.  Should marketers care about satisfying Medicaid patients? , 1995, Journal of health care marketing.

[20]  G. Mwabu,et al.  Quality of Medical Care and Choice of Medical Treatment in Kenya An Empirical Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  J. Till,et al.  Effect of nonmedical factors on family physicians' decisions about referral for consultation. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[22]  S. Berman,et al.  Participation of Colorado pediatricians and family physicians in the Medicaid program. , 1991, The Western journal of medicine.

[23]  T. Sharpe,et al.  Factors Affecting Physician Participation in a State Medicaid Program , 1979, Medical care.