A hybrid MCDM-based FMEA model for identification of critical failure modes in manufacturing

The effective identification of critical failure modes of individual equipment components or processes and the development of plans for improvement are crucial for the manufacturing industry. Recently, the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) approach based on multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) has been utilized effectively for the assessment of primary failure modes and risks. However, the ranking results of failure modes produced by different MCDM methods might be different. This study proposes an integrated risk assessment model where several techniques are combined to produce an FMEA model for the generation of comprehensive failure mode ranking. First, the anticipated costs and environmental protection indicators are included in the FMEA model to enhance the comprehensiveness of assessment. Then, an influential network relationship map of risk factors is obtained by using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique to assist in identifying the critical factors. Finally, the ranking of the failure modes is identified using the four integrated MCDM methods, based on the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) concept. In addition, data from a machine tool manufacturing company survey are applied to demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed model.

[1]  Xin Guo Ming,et al.  A rough TOPSIS Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Uncertain Environments , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[2]  Gülin Feryal Can,et al.  An intutionistic approach based on failure mode and effect analysis for prioritizing corrective and preventive strategies , 2018 .

[3]  Yusof Ismail,et al.  An aggregation technique for optimal decision-making in materials selection , 2011 .

[4]  Kai-Ying Chen,et al.  A Novel FMEA Model Based on Rough BWM and Rough TOPSIS-AL for Risk Assessment , 2019, Mathematics.

[5]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Soumava Boral,et al.  A hybrid decision making framework for modified failure mode effects and criticality analysis , 2019, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

[7]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  A Novel Approach for FMEA: Combination of Interval 2‐Tuple Linguistic Variables and Gray Relational Analysis , 2015, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[8]  Mohsen Varmazyar,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach. , 2016, Evaluation and program planning.

[9]  Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo,et al.  A model for failure mode and effects analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy approach , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[10]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  A New Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on k-Means Clustering Within Hesitant Linguistic Environment , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  Binbin Xu,et al.  A new failure mode and effects analysis model of CNC machine tool using fuzzy theory , 2010, The 2010 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation.

[12]  Omidvar Mohsen,et al.  An extended VIKOR method based on entropy measure for the failure modes risk assessment – A case study of the geothermal power plant (GPP) , 2017 .

[13]  Gülin Feryal Can,et al.  A stochastic approach for failure mode and effect analysis , 2017, RAIRO Oper. Res..

[14]  Chee Peng Lim,et al.  A perceptual computing-based method to prioritize failure modes in failure mode and effect analysis and its application to edible bird nest farming , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: A systematic literature review , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[16]  Soumava Boral,et al.  A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision making approach for failure mode and effect analysis: An essential requirement for sustainable manufacturing , 2020, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[17]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy COPRAS method for performance measurement in total productive maintenance: a comparative analysis , 2016 .

[18]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems , 2017 .

[19]  Ragil Saputra,et al.  Flood-prone Areas Mapping at Semarang City by Using Simple Additive Weighting Method☆ , 2016 .

[20]  Nan Liu,et al.  Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Kuei-Hu Chang,et al.  Generalized multi-attribute failure mode analysis , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[22]  Chun-Nen Huang,et al.  A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection , 2017 .

[24]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A new hybrid simulation-based assignment approach for evaluating airlines with multiple service quality criteria , 2017 .

[25]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[26]  Jhareswar Maiti,et al.  Risk analysis using FMEA: Fuzzy similarity value and possibility theory based approach , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Ali Kokangul,et al.  Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[28]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using D numbers and grey relational projection method , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Zdenek Hadas,et al.  QUANTITIES AND SENSORS FOR MACHINE TOOL SPINDLE CONDITION MONITORING , 2016 .

[31]  Soumava Boral,et al.  An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA , 2020, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[32]  Erhan Bozdag,et al.  Risk prioritization in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Yang Lu,et al.  Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues , 2017, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[34]  Cheng-Wei Lin,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation , 2005 .

[35]  Chao Deng,et al.  Improved multi-faults diagnosis for CNC machine tools , 2016, 2016 12th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA).

[36]  G. Seliger,et al.  Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0 , 2016 .

[37]  Hacer Güner Gören A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales , 2018 .

[38]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying multiple criteria method COPRAS: A Lithuanian case , 2006 .

[39]  Hamidreza Maghsoudlou,et al.  FQSPM-SWOT for strategic alliance planning and partner selection:case study in a holding car manufacturer company , 2015 .

[40]  R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Sustainable-supplier selection for manufacturing services: a failure mode and effects analysis model based on interval-valued fuzzy group decision-making , 2018 .

[41]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  An approach for robust decision making rule generation: Solving transport and logistics decision making problems , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Xu Wang,et al.  Sustainable recycling partner selection using fuzzy DEMATEL-AEW-FVIKOR: A case study in small-and-medium enterprises (SMEs) , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[43]  Bart Kamp,et al.  Smart servitization within the context of industrial user–supplier relationships: contingencies according to a machine tool manufacturer , 2017 .

[44]  Yung-Chia Chang,et al.  Enhancing FMEA assessment by integrating grey relational analysis and the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach , 2013 .

[45]  Jindong Qin,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for risk assessment based on interval type-2 fuzzy evidential reasoning method , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[46]  Qingji Zhou,et al.  Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction , 2016 .

[47]  Md. Abdul Moktadir,et al.  Assessing challenges for implementing Industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[48]  James J. H. Liou,et al.  A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[49]  Slobodan Zecevic,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[50]  Zaifang Zhang,et al.  Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[51]  Rita Gamberini,et al.  FlowSort-GDSS - A novel group multi-criteria decision support system for sorting problems with application to FMEA , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Ting Kuo,et al.  A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..