Quantitative evaluation of local myocardial blood volume in contrast echocardiography

Myocardial perfusion is usually assessed by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging. Information about myocardial perfusion is sometimes deduced from angiography or Computed Tomography (CT) angiography, which detect coronary artery stenosis. Contrast echocardiography can be used for that purpose as well. However, the currently available data acquisition and analysis methods are difficult to manage in the clinical environment. This paper presents a novel contrast echo data acquisition protocol and parameter extraction procedure, providing an automatic quantitative evaluation of the local myocardial blood volume for the entire left ventricular myocardium. This information is indicative of local perfusion. Our method evaluates the myocardial blood volume according to the local gray level intensity, as measured during a single heartbeat, when there is a distinct myocardial opacification (based on visual estimation). The echocardiographic image analysis is based on a new attenuation correction technique, which compensates for the ultrasonic signal attenuation in both the tissue and the contrast agent. In comparison, the existing contrast echo based methods utilize the long-term temporal variability of the gray level to extract information regarding the local myocardial blood flow velocity. Our technique has been tested on 17 cine-loops of 15 different patients. We have found a high correlation between abnormal segments, detected automatically by our technique, and segments that have been clinically diagnosed as ischemic (at rest) or infarcted. For that purpose, we have defined ischemic segments as segments fed by coronary arteries with severe stenosis, as determined by angiography, and infarcted segments as segments after Acute Myocardial Infarction, as detected by electrocardiography. Furthermore, we have found a high correlation between the automatically calculated myocardial blood volume levels and the clinical evaluation of segmental contractility, based on echocardiographic imaging.

[1]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.

[2]  Andrés Santos,et al.  Tracking of regions-of-interest in myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  L. Weinert,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion using real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic imaging , 2004, Computers in Cardiology, 2004.

[4]  Solange Akselrod,et al.  Stationary clutter rejection in echocardiography. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  S Akselrod,et al.  Contrast echocardiographic quantification of regional myocardial perfusion: validation with an isolated rabbit heart model. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  Hisashi Masugata,et al.  Contrast echocardiography can assess risk area and infarct size during coronary occlusion and reperfusion: experimental validation. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  S Akselrod,et al.  Myocardial regional blood flow: quantitative measurement by computer analysis of contrast enhanced echocardiographic images. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  Solange Akselrod,et al.  Adaptive brightness transfer functions in echocardiography. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Solange Akselrod,et al.  Automatic Endocardial-Boundary Detection in Low Mechanical-Index Contrast Echocardiography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  J. Thomas,et al.  New imaging technology: measurement of myocardial perfusion by contrast echocardiography. , 2000, Coronary artery disease.

[11]  Andres Santos,et al.  Myocardial perfusion assessment with contrast echocardiography , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Myocardial ultrasonic backscatter for characterization of ischemia and reperfusion: relationship to wall motion. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  S Akselrod,et al.  Myocardial transit time of the echocardiographic contrast media. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Myocardial Hibernation-a delicate balance , 2004 .

[15]  T. Marwick,et al.  Use of Cyclic Variation of Integrated Backscatter to Assess Contractile Reserve and Myocardial Viability in Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction , 2002, Echocardiography.

[16]  J. Seward,et al.  Correlation of regional wall motion abnormalities detected by two-dimensional echocardiography with perfusion defect determined by technetium 99m sestamibi imaging in patients treated with reperfusion therapy during acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, American heart journal.

[17]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  James D. Thomas,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  J. Bucerius,et al.  Single- vs. dual-head SPECT for detection of myocardial ischemia and viability in a large study population. , 2007, Clinical imaging.

[20]  S Akselrod,et al.  Digital path-dependent recompensation of contrast-enhanced echocardiographic images. , 1992, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  H W Woo,et al.  Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function. , 1986, Circulation.

[22]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Hyperdynamic performance of remote myocardium in acute infarction. Correlation between regional contractile function and myocardial perfusion. , 1995, European heart journal.