"It's Not Who You Know, but Who You Add: " An investigation into the differential impact of friend adding and self-disclosure on interpersonal perceptions on Facebook

Abstract This research seeks to understand how people perceive and respond to structural factors and different types of disclosure on Facebook when evaluating the profile of someone they have never met offline. Using a 2 × 3 × 2 between-subjects experimental design, this research explored the relationship between friend adding (add; no add), levels of self-disclosure (low, medium, high), and sex of the Facebook profile owner (male; female) on feelings of interpersonal liking, future behavioral intentions to interact, and homophily. Results indicated that friend adding and higher levels of self-disclosure led to greater feelings of interpersonal liking and homophily amongst both male and female participants. In addition, males tended to view other male profiles with moderate amounts of disclosure and female profiles with the highest amount of disclosure most favorably. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

[1]  Pavica Sheldon,et al.  The Relationship Between Unwillingness-to-Communicate and Students' Facebook Use , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[2]  Joseph A. DeVito,et al.  The interpersonal communication book , 1969 .

[3]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Helen Mayer Hacker,et al.  Blabbermouths and Clams: Sex Differences in Self-Disclosure in Same-Sex and Cross-Sex Friendship Dyads , 1981 .

[5]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[6]  Richard Gelman,et al.  Interpersonal liking and self-disclosure. , 1978 .

[7]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[8]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[9]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[10]  C. Kleck,et al.  The Company You Keep and the Image You Project: Putting Your Best Face Forward in Online Social Networks , 2007 .

[11]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[13]  Pamela F. Wendt,et al.  Interrogative strategies and information exchange in computer‐mediated communication , 1999 .

[14]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Meanings for Closeness and Intimacy in Friendship , 1996 .

[15]  Michael Stefanone,et al.  We're all stars now: reality television, web 2.0, and mediated identities , 2008, Hypertext.

[16]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009, Commun. Res..

[17]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Cues and Impression Formation in CMC , 2003 .

[19]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. , 1994 .

[20]  Em Griffin.  A First Look at Communication Theory , 2005 .

[21]  M. Mendelson,et al.  Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill Friendship Questionnaires. , 1999 .

[22]  B. Gerry Coulter,et al.  Sex and Gender: An Introduction , 1988 .

[23]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? , 2001, Commun. Res..

[25]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[26]  Erin E. Hollenbaugh,et al.  Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Michael Stefanone,et al.  Contingencies of Self-Worth and Social-Networking-Site Behavior , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  D. Bonge,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure. , 1985 .

[30]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[31]  M. Allen,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[33]  Patrick B. O'Sullivan,et al.  Mediated Immediacy , 2004 .

[34]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[35]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[36]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[37]  Diane Carlson Jones,et al.  Friendship Satisfaction and Gender: An Examination of Sex Differences in Contributors to Friendship Satisfaction , 1991 .

[38]  J. Walther.  Impression Development in Computer-Mediated Interaction. , 1993 .

[39]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE OF PERCEIVED HOMOPHILY IN INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[40]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication Revisited , 2001, Commun. Res..

[41]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[42]  Pavica Sheldon.  Examining Gender Differences in Self-disclosure on Facebook Versus Face-to-Face , 2013 .