A Comparison of Methodologies to Investigate the Influence of Light on the Atmosphere of a Space

ABSTRACT The impression of a space depends highly on the illumination in the space, which usually is a combination of electric light and daylight. In the present study, we compared three methodologies to study the influence of electric light and daylight on the perception of the light and the perception of the atmosphere of the space. In two experiments, rating scales were used (with a blocked and a random design, respectively) and in a third experiment the paired-comparison method was used to evaluate the light and the atmosphere of the space. In all experiments, visualizations were used to create differently illuminated spaces. All methodologies showed similar effects of daylight and electric light, which attests to the convergent validity of the research methods. However, the methodologies revealed different effect sizes, rendering the paired-comparison design most sensitive to detect the smallest differences. The results also allowed us to explore the contribution of electric light and daylight in creating an atmosphere. The use of visualizations enabled us to control the luminance of daylight and to disentangle the effects of daylight entering a window from the view from a window. The outcomes show that daylight plays a smaller role than electric light on the perception of light and atmosphere in a space when the luminance of daylight is controlled and there is no view outside.

[1]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  Cognitive issues in image quality measurement , 2001, J. Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Steve Fotios,et al.  A comparison of simultaneous and sequential brightness judgements , 2010 .

[3]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Research Methods to Avoid Bias in Categorical Ratings of Brightness , 2009 .

[4]  A Antal Haans,et al.  The natural preference in people's appraisal of light , 2014 .

[5]  Ann Sloan Devlin,et al.  PERCEIVED QUALITY OF CARE: THE INFLUENCE OF THE WAITING ROOM ENVIRONMENT , 2002 .

[6]  Ingrid M. L. C. Vogels,et al.  Effect of daylight on atmosphere perception: comparison of a real space and visualizations , 2015, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Claudia Moscoso,et al.  Analysis of Stereoscopic Images as a New Method for Daylighting Studies , 2015, TAP 2015.

[8]  J. Russell,et al.  A Description of the Affective Quality Attributed to Environments , 1980 .

[9]  Nilgün Olguntürk,et al.  Impact of lighting arrangements and illuminances on different impressions of a room , 2007 .

[10]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  Photographic tone reproduction for digital images , 2002, ACM Trans. Graph..

[11]  Mark S. Rea,et al.  Semantic differential scaling: Prospects in lighting research , 1992 .

[12]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  The power of outliers (and why researchers should ALWAYS check for them) , 2004 .

[13]  Kevin W. Houser,et al.  Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling , 2003 .

[14]  L. Loe,et al.  Appearance of lit environment and its relevance in lighting design: Experimental study , 1994 .

[15]  M. G. M. Stokkermans,et al.  Temporal dark adaptation to spatially complex backgrounds: effect of an additional light source. , 2014, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  E. Poulton.  Quantitative subjective assessments are almost always biased, sometimes completely misleading* , 1977 .

[17]  J. E. Flynn,et al.  Interim Study of Procedures for Investigating the Effect of Light on Impression and Behavior , 1973 .

[18]  SooCheong Jang,et al.  The effects of atmospheric elements on customer impression: the case of hotel lobbies , 2006 .

[19]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[21]  M. Muzamil Naqshbandi,et al.  Atmospheric Elements and Personality: Impact on Hotel Lobby Impressions , 2013 .

[22]  Femke Beute,et al.  Salutogenic effects of the environment: review of health protective effects of nature and daylight. , 2014, Applied psychology. Health and well-being.

[23]  Minchen Wei,et al.  Guidance towards Best Practice in Psychophysical Procedures Used when Measuring Relative Spatial Brightness , 2014 .

[24]  T. Schielke.  Validity of simulations for lighting and brand image evaluation , 2016 .

[25]  Michael J. Murdoch,et al.  Towards perceptual accuracy in 3D visualizations of illuminated indoor environments , 2015 .

[26]  M Stokkermans,et al.  Relation between the perceived atmosphere of a lit environment and perceptual attributes of light , 2018 .

[27]  Judith Redi,et al.  Effects of ageing on atmosphere perception , 2012 .

[28]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[29]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[30]  XY Liu,et al.  A study of atmosphere perceptions in a living room , 2015 .

[31]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments , 2010 .

[32]  M D Fairchild,et al.  Time course of chromatic adaptation for color-appearance judgments. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  Rosemarie Rajae-Joordens,et al.  Paired comparisons in visual perception studies using small sample sizes , 2005, Displays.

[34]  M. Ronnier Luo,et al.  A study of atmosphere perception of dynamic coloured light , 2014 .

[35]  Karen M. Braun,et al.  Viewing techniques for cross‐media image comparisons , 1996 .

[36]  Pjm Pieter Custers,et al.  Lighting in retail environments: Atmosphere perception in the real world , 2010 .

[37]  D. Atlı,et al.  Comparing Judgments of Visual Clarity and Spatial Brightness through an Analysis of Studies Using the Category Rating Procedure , 2012 .

[38]  Thomas Schielke.  Influence of Lighting Design on Marketing Communication , 2015 .

[39]  KW Houser,et al.  The subjective response to linear fluorescent direct/indirect lighting systems , 2002 .

[40]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  Perceived room brightness: Pilot study on the effect of luminance distribution , 1995 .

[41]  P. Westfall,et al.  Understanding Advanced Statistical Methods , 2013 .

[42]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[43]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[44]  Mariska G. M. Stokkermans,et al.  The effect of spatial luminance distribution on dark adaptation. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[45]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..