Diversity or Difference? New Research Supports the Case for a Cultural Perspective on Women in Computing

Gender difference approaches to the participation of women in computing have not provided adequate explanations for women’s declining interest in computer science (CS) and related technical fields. Indeed, the search for gender differences can work against diversity which we define as a cross-gender spectrum of characteristics, interests, abilities, experiences, beliefs and identities. Our ongoing case studies at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) provide evidence to show that a focus on culture offers the most insightful and effective approach for investigating women’s participation in CS. In this paper, we illustrate this approach and show the significance of cultural factors by describing a new case study which examines the attitudes of CS majors at CMU. Our analysis found that most men and women felt comfortable in the school, believed they could be successful in the CS environment at CMU, and thought they fit in socially and academically. In brief, we did not see any evidence of a strong gender divide in student attitudes towards fitting in or feeling like they could be successful; indeed we found that the Women-CS fit remained strong from prior years. Hence, our research demonstrates that women, alongside their male peers, can fit successfully into a CS environment and help shape that environment and computing culture, for the benefit of everyone, without accommodating presumed gender differences or any compromises to academic integrity.

[1]  Elizabeth A. Larsen,et al.  INCREASING DIVERSITY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE: ACKNOWLEDGING, YET MOVING BEYOND, GENDER , 2005 .

[2]  C. Fine Delusions of gender : how our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference , 2010 .

[3]  S. Pinker The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature , 2002 .

[4]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  Same Difference: How Gender Myths Are Hurting Our Relationships, Our Children, and Our Jobs , 2004 .

[5]  Hasmik Gharibyan,et al.  Gender gap in computer science does not exist in one former soviet republic: results of a study , 2006, ITICSE '06.

[6]  Michael W. Matier,et al.  Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions , 1994 .

[7]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Essential Difference: The Truth About the Male and Female Brain , 2003 .

[8]  Monica Adya,et al.  Women at work: Individual and cultural differences in IT career experiences and perceptions between South Asian and American women , 2008 .

[9]  Tandra Tyler-Wood,et al.  Bringing Up Girls in Science (BUGS): The Effectiveness of an Afterschool Environmental Science Program for Increasing Female Students’ Interest in Science Careers , 2012 .

[10]  Mazliza Othman,et al.  Women in computer science , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[11]  L. Schiebinger Skeletons in the Closet: The First Illustrations of the Female Skeleton in Eighteenth-Century Anatomy , 1986 .

[12]  C. Steele A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[13]  Sophia Huyer,et al.  Women, ICT and the information society: global perspectives and initiatives , 2005, CWIT '05.

[14]  Predicting Scientific Understanding of Prospective Elementary Teachers: Role of Gender, Education Level, Courses in Science, and Attitudes Toward Science and Mathematics , 2005 .

[15]  Celine Latulipe,et al.  CS girls rock: sparking interest in computer science and debunking the stereotypes , 2003, SIGCSE.

[16]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  J. Wajcman Feminism Confronts Technology , 1991 .

[18]  Sylvia Beyer,et al.  Gender Differences in Attitudes toward and Confidence in Computer Science. , 2002 .

[19]  M. Adya,et al.  Women at work: Differences in IT career experiences and perceptions between South Asian and American women , 2008 .

[20]  Joanne McGrath Cohoon,et al.  Toward improving female retention in the computer science major , 2001, CACM.

[21]  Michelle Pinto de Lima As mulheres na Ciência da Computação , 2013 .

[22]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[23]  Carol Frieze,et al.  The Evolving Culture of Computing: Similarity Is the Difference , 2005 .

[24]  Carol Frieze,et al.  Culture and environment as determinants of women's participation in computing: revealing the "women-CS fit" , 2006, SIGCSE '06.

[25]  Susan M. Haller,et al.  Gender differences in computer science students , 2003, SIGCSE.

[26]  Eileen M. Trauth Theorizing Gender and Information Technology Research , 2006 .

[27]  C. Nadelson,et al.  Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order , 1989 .

[28]  Carol Frieze,et al.  Building an effective computer science student organization: the Carnegie Mellon women@SCS action plan , 2002, SGCS.

[29]  Vashti Galpin,et al.  Women in computing around the world , 2002, SGCS.

[30]  Cynthia Fuchs Epstein,et al.  Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender and the Social Order , 1990 .

[31]  D. Cheek,et al.  Gender and equity issues in computer-based science assessment , 1995 .

[32]  Eric Bettinger,et al.  Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students , 2005 .

[33]  Leslie Heywood The women's movement today : an encyclopedia of third-wave feminism , 2006 .

[34]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[35]  Lee Hassall,et al.  Culture is Ordinary , 2012 .

[36]  Lilly Irani Understanding gender and confidence in CS course culture , 2004 .

[37]  L. Blum,et al.  A Cultural Perspective on Gender Diversity in Computing , 2007 .

[38]  M. Marini,et al.  Sex and gender: What do we know? , 1990 .

[39]  Orit Hazzan,et al.  Factors influencing the shrinking pipeline in high schools: a sector-based analysis of the Israeli high school system , 2005, SIGCSE '05.

[40]  Susan M. Haller,et al.  Deterrents to women taking computer science courses , 2004, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[41]  J. Stanley,et al.  Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact? , 1980, Science.

[42]  Carol Frieze Diversifying the images of computer science: undergraduate women take on the challenge! , 2005 .

[43]  Shakuntala Baichoo,et al.  An expanding pipeline: gender in mauritius , 2003, SIGCSE.

[44]  Lenore Blum Women in Computer Science: The Carnegie Mellon Experience , 2001 .

[45]  Dennis Dworkin,et al.  Culture Is Ordinary , 2012 .

[46]  Lecia Jane Barker,et al.  Making Visible the Behaviors that Influence Learning Environment: A Qualitative Exploration of Computer Science Classrooms , 2004, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[47]  C. Steele,et al.  Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  R. Koul,et al.  Relationship Between Career Aspirations and Measures of Motivation Toward Biology and Physics, and the Influence of Gender , 2011 .

[49]  J P De Cecco,et al.  A critique and synthesis of biological essentialism and social constructionist views of sexuality and gender. , 1993, Journal of homosexuality.

[50]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  A Multicultural Analysis of Factors Influencing Career Choice for Women in the Information Technology Workforce , 2008, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[51]  B. Kable Mental health. , 2005, Australian family physician.

[52]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Stuart Zweben,et al.  Computing Degree and Enrollment Trends , 2012 .

[54]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Journal of Information , Communication and Ethics in Society Power relations in IT education and work : the intersectionality of gender , race , and class , 2015 .

[55]  J. Stanley,et al.  Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts. , 1983, Science.

[56]  J. Hyde,et al.  The Gender Similarities Hypothesis , 2005 .