Uncertainty quantification in experimental frequency based substructuring

Abstract Numerical conditioning of the subsystems’ interface flexibility matrix is an important issue in experimental frequency based substructuring (FBS) methods. As this matrix needs to be inverted, it is believed that ill numerical conditioning could severely magnify even small random errors in experimentally obtained subsystems, yielding erroneous FRFs of the coupled system. In this paper a method is introduced with which the uncertainty of the coupled system's FRFs can be quantified based on the uncertainties of the subsystem FRFs. This uncertainty propagation method is based on the statistical moment method and uses the measured (time) data of the subsystems as input. The method will be applied to a numerical example, where it is shown that the uncertainty on substructure FRFs can significantly influence the accuracy of the coupled system. Furthermore, the application shows that the method introduced is computationally efficient and highlights some interesting phenomena that can be encountered in experimental dynamic substructuring.

[1]  Alex Berman,et al.  Theory of Incomplete Models of Dynamic Structures , 1971 .

[2]  G. Hazelrigg Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design , 1996 .

[3]  Kaare Brandt Petersen,et al.  The Matrix Cookbook , 2006 .

[4]  J. Li,et al.  A theoretical and computational study of the frf-based substructuring technique applying enhanced least square and TSVD approaches , 2000 .

[5]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Structural modification. Part 2: assignment of natural frequencies and antiresonances by an added beam , 2005 .

[6]  D. Rixen,et al.  General Framework for Dynamic Substructuring: History, Review and Classification of Techniques , 2008 .

[7]  Michel Dekking,et al.  A Modern Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Understanding Why and How , 2007 .

[8]  W. J. Duncan XXXV. The admittance method for obtaining the natural frequencies of systems , 1941 .

[9]  Thomas G. Sofrin,et al.  The Combination of Dynamical Systems , 1946 .

[10]  M. Géradin,et al.  Mechanical Vibrations: Theory and Application to Structural Dynamics , 1994 .

[11]  Aldo Sestieri,et al.  A Unified Approach to Substructuring and Structural Modification Problems , 2004 .

[12]  Sathy P. Viswanathan,et al.  A Statistical Analysis to Assess the Reliability of a Rotorcraft Component in Fatigue , 1988 .

[13]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[14]  M. Bampton,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. , 1968 .

[15]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Uncertainty Modeling and Management in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Synthesis , 2000 .

[16]  S. Rubin Improved Component-Mode Representation for Structural Dynamic Analysis , 1975 .

[17]  N. Metropolis,et al.  The Monte Carlo method. , 1949 .

[18]  R. Macneal A hybrid method of component mode synthesis , 1971 .

[19]  B. Øksendal Stochastic differential equations : an introduction with applications , 1987 .

[20]  Richard L. Bielawa,et al.  Generalized Frequency Domain Substructure Synthesis , 1988 .